Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

44
Upper left imagery in another pic of the shop teacher from yesterday's post. (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 3 years ago by glownigger8675309 3 years ago by glownigger8675309 +46 / -2
28 comments download share
28 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– BlueDrache 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No. The calling out is a social structure to help enforce societal norms, to which these faggots are an aberration.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

a) no; not; nothing; nothingness doesn't represent a perceivable state; but was suggested to you.

b) agreement (yes) vs disagreement (no) represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.

c) what if suggested SOCI'ETY, noun - "a number of persons united" tempts "one" to ignore representing U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness" aka being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?

Being apart (partial within whole) or consenting to e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka to being domesticated cattle within the suggested "united" nations; european "union"; "united" states of others...your choice.

d) what if suggested law enforcement tempts one to ignore being the resistance (living) within the natural order of velocity (process of dying) aka the force of reaction within the force of enacting?

If one ignores that for following the suggested orders by others; hence becoming an order follower; chained within command; a vessel within the mainstream; a follower of leaders etc. then one ignores resisting; hence the many become unable to defend themselves from the suggestions of the few.

e) the structure of form (life) represents flow (inception towards death), and to sustain form within flow requires the struggle to resist; not following suggested societal norms towards death.

The desperate attempt by the ignorant many to hold onto society is what allows the parasitic few to (pride) parade all over them without any noticeable resistance.

f) if you go against suggested degeneracy; you are being tempted away from generating. One cannot sustain self by going out to attack others. Choice exists within the center of perceivable balance (need/want); others choose to tempt choice with suggested imbalance (want vs not want); yet temptation requires one to choose want (suggested) over need (perceivable). That represents willing ignorance...a host weakness among the many; which causes the parasitic reactions among the few.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BlueDrache 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

TL;DR

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 3 years ago +2 / -2

What if it's never about what you think something is; but what you shape out of what everything was?

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy