Upper left imagery in another pic of the shop teacher from yesterday's post.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Just say that you have to call the faggots out.
They don't need to be called out...the insolence of the few reacts to the ignorance of the many. Ignorance implies as one choosing to ignore all perceivable for the suggestions of others; which then tempts one to blame others for the consequences.
A faggot (bundle of sticks) represents a burden...a self inflicted BURD'EN, verb - "to incumber with weight". These kids feel a burden to acknowledge perceivable reality; because they willingly consent to not offend suggested fiction.
Take the "elephant in the room" allegory...is the elephant to blame for being in the room; or does the room represent ones responsibility about what occupies an APART (a part of) MENT (mind)?
Does perceivable reality need to be suggested (called out) to others or is it already perceivable for everyone?
No. The calling out is a social structure to help enforce societal norms, to which these faggots are an aberration.
a) no; not; nothing; nothingness doesn't represent a perceivable state; but was suggested to you.
b) agreement (yes) vs disagreement (no) represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
c) what if suggested SOCI'ETY, noun - "a number of persons united" tempts "one" to ignore representing U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness" aka being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
Being apart (partial within whole) or consenting to e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka to being domesticated cattle within the suggested "united" nations; european "union"; "united" states of others...your choice.
d) what if suggested law enforcement tempts one to ignore being the resistance (living) within the natural order of velocity (process of dying) aka the force of reaction within the force of enacting?
If one ignores that for following the suggested orders by others; hence becoming an order follower; chained within command; a vessel within the mainstream; a follower of leaders etc. then one ignores resisting; hence the many become unable to defend themselves from the suggestions of the few.
e) the structure of form (life) represents flow (inception towards death), and to sustain form within flow requires the struggle to resist; not following suggested societal norms towards death.
The desperate attempt by the ignorant many to hold onto society is what allows the parasitic few to (pride) parade all over them without any noticeable resistance.
f) if you go against suggested degeneracy; you are being tempted away from generating. One cannot sustain self by going out to attack others. Choice exists within the center of perceivable balance (need/want); others choose to tempt choice with suggested imbalance (want vs not want); yet temptation requires one to choose want (suggested) over need (perceivable). That represents willing ignorance...a host weakness among the many; which causes the parasitic reactions among the few.
TL;DR