Are you singular (one) or plural (we)? What if the few suggest each one of the many to behave plural aka collectivism aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) as to tempt them to behave like goyim (cattle)?
They believe it. They act on those beliefs. They have the ability to act on those beliefs.
a) if believing represents consenting to want or not want a suggestion; then who suggested the few to believe?
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being "reaction" within enacting; so suggested "action" implies believing the suggestion thereof by the reacting choices of others.
c) free will of choice represents the response-ability to react as choice to an enacting balance based system...need (perceivable) or want (suggested).
peaceful genocide
What if the warlike conflicts are part of the suggested narratives; which in return allows a mostly peaceful genocide?
Underneath that...what if the temporary living choose to ignore the ongoing process of dying, and what if that ignorance is being exploited by a few who suggest narratives to distract the ignorant living from the process of dying?
What if it's not a genocide against the living; but a distraction from dying and the response-ability (choice) of the living to resist? What if the few use suggestion to direct the transmutation of the ingredient (living) back to base (process of dying)?
What if dying represents the temptation for the living to ignore resisting?
That goof is a total piece of shit, everything he says is criminal.
I have an easier option, anyone who supports wef should be the ones culled.
Are you singular (one) or plural (we)? What if the few suggest each one of the many to behave plural aka collectivism aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) as to tempt them to behave like goyim (cattle)?
a) if believing represents consenting to want or not want a suggestion; then who suggested the few to believe?
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being "reaction" within enacting; so suggested "action" implies believing the suggestion thereof by the reacting choices of others.
c) free will of choice represents the response-ability to react as choice to an enacting balance based system...need (perceivable) or want (suggested).
What if the warlike conflicts are part of the suggested narratives; which in return allows a mostly peaceful genocide?
Underneath that...what if the temporary living choose to ignore the ongoing process of dying, and what if that ignorance is being exploited by a few who suggest narratives to distract the ignorant living from the process of dying?
What if it's not a genocide against the living; but a distraction from dying and the response-ability (choice) of the living to resist? What if the few use suggestion to direct the transmutation of the ingredient (living) back to base (process of dying)?
What if dying represents the temptation for the living to ignore resisting?