I see constant, verifiable bits of evidence that disprove each model, yet I see a constant stream of diatribes from each side… sound familiar? Divide and conquer. It's possible that both models are false, completely.
Nobody can deny the fake footage from the ISS, the absolutely fake moon landing, the fake Tesla Roadster in space, the lasers across 20 mile stretches, the zoom ends on boats that should be completely behind the horizon, etc.
And then on the flipside, nobody can deny things like the celestial poles (a post today), the ability to grab a telescope in view another planet, etc.
It's possible we are in a physical simulation of some kind. I think pretending that we know the answer for sure, one way or another, based on bullshit and lies fed to us by the television is just a LARP.
Thoughts?
So tell me then, why does NASA need to lie?
I can certainly agree with that. I've seen pictures of real hidden DUMBs. Way more extensive than people would think.
And that's not touching upon Antarctica, hidden/obscured/mostly ignored islands, Greenland, et. al.
If you think about it, Game of Thrones was probably a simple conversion of that whole deal.
Scary monsters once you get past the Wall.
I was responding to deferent people making similar points. The replies are going to similar. But every reply was respectful.
This is my opinion, but I think NASA lies because they know and are capable of so much less than they claim.
Can you tell me, how 2, and only 2, celestial poles, that are always consistently revolving around the same points regardless of viewing point on Earth fits into the flat Earth theory?
And there you go again.
That is foaming at the mouth. And it makes no sense bringing it up in response to the comment I made (which simply asked why NASA lies). Your answer to which was quite lacking.
We’ll have to agree to disagree.
If me asking a follow up question is “foaming at the mouth,” then surely expecting me to explain all of NASA’s lies away is too.
We agree NASA lies as I establish from my 1st response. Nothing to debate there, but yet you keep bring it up... for some reason. Deflection, maybe.
Now I know why you are here. Thanks.
Not that I had any doubts in the first place.
And that "follow up question" makes NO sense given my comments and the topic of the OP, sorry.