To get an idea of what our earth looks like search 'gleason 1892 map'. The north pole is actually the center of our earth, and there is no south pole. Antarctica is an encircling landmass, some refer to it as the ice wall. We can't say for sure what lies beyond Antarctica because it's impossible to explore there independently due to the Antarctic treaty. Planes will be shot down, and vessels attacked who even get too close to Antarctica without approval from the UN. All research and military stations wouldn't allow you to leave and explore either. It's also by far the harshest climate in the world. There could be more land beyond Antarctica for all I know. Biblical cosmology suggests that is where the firmament is mounted. The Firmament is a solid dome over earth.
Some of the best evidence debunking this is how the stars spin in opposite directions depending on whether or not you are near the North Pole or the South Pole.
They spin in opposite directions because we are on opposite sides of a spinning globe.
Even though Dave seems like a pretentious prick, I do think he comes up with great counter-arguments that prove that Flat Earth theory can't stand up to rigorous debate 10 Challenges For Flat Earthershttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQl8h7Aa75s
I watch the 10 challenges thing. I feel like I can address all his points with the caveat there are somethings that flat earthers can only speculate on not prove. We're there any of those 10 you found especially compelling?
Why does the sun set behind the horizon if the flat earth model shows it just moves around the sky and should just become more distant as it moves around flat earth, not set over the horizon.
The southern star trails were a hard one to sort out. I'll link a video that simulates what we are seeing on FE and why the stars appear that way. I've seen a better simulation but I can't find it at the moment, this one gives you the idea though.
Basically our local perception is causing that effect. It's the same with the sun and the moon. The path we view is not their actual path through the sky, just what we are able to see before they vanish over the horizon.
This is one of the most complicated things to resolve because I don't know if the stars are inside or outside the firmament, or how that would effect it. However, even if we fail to explain it, it doesn't mean that the earth is a spinning ball suddenly, to many other proofs against that for me to believe it anymore.
Well it's not just the stars spinning in opposite directions on north and south pole
Water flows in opposite direction in toilet
Also some stars you can see in south hemisphere that you cant in northern. because Earth is round.
Also, if you get on a high elevation, you cannot see far enough into the distance as you should be able to if the Earth was flat. Especially from top of a mountain.
Also, it's unbelievable that someone wouldn't be able to reach the boundary of this so called dome firmament. Near the ice walls it should be easy to breach the lower end of the curve.
Then there's the problem with tides. The moon causes tides. What does flat earth model use to explain tides?
Also, I don't really trust any of the flat earth maps. Like that guy said. Where's the professional flat earth map with the scale that we can test out?
Like I said. I'm not claiming to be smarter than anyone. I'm just not convinced of the flat earth model, even though I find it interesting.
So is there an edge and what happens past it?
Of course there is an edge in space.
It is the same edge that earth has.
As above So below.
Well why dont people go to the no go zone to discover?
To get an idea of what our earth looks like search 'gleason 1892 map'. The north pole is actually the center of our earth, and there is no south pole. Antarctica is an encircling landmass, some refer to it as the ice wall. We can't say for sure what lies beyond Antarctica because it's impossible to explore there independently due to the Antarctic treaty. Planes will be shot down, and vessels attacked who even get too close to Antarctica without approval from the UN. All research and military stations wouldn't allow you to leave and explore either. It's also by far the harshest climate in the world. There could be more land beyond Antarctica for all I know. Biblical cosmology suggests that is where the firmament is mounted. The Firmament is a solid dome over earth.
Some of the best evidence debunking this is how the stars spin in opposite directions depending on whether or not you are near the North Pole or the South Pole.
They spin in opposite directions because we are on opposite sides of a spinning globe.
Even though Dave seems like a pretentious prick, I do think he comes up with great counter-arguments that prove that Flat Earth theory can't stand up to rigorous debate 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQl8h7Aa75s
https://youtu.be/R9FKYsV3iKA
Found someone who made a response video to those 10 points if you want to hear a retort on any of them.
I watch the 10 challenges thing. I feel like I can address all his points with the caveat there are somethings that flat earthers can only speculate on not prove. We're there any of those 10 you found especially compelling?
The sunset argument.
Why does the sun set behind the horizon if the flat earth model shows it just moves around the sky and should just become more distant as it moves around flat earth, not set over the horizon.
The southern star trails were a hard one to sort out. I'll link a video that simulates what we are seeing on FE and why the stars appear that way. I've seen a better simulation but I can't find it at the moment, this one gives you the idea though.
https://youtu.be/xnbs1s8DKVs
Basically our local perception is causing that effect. It's the same with the sun and the moon. The path we view is not their actual path through the sky, just what we are able to see before they vanish over the horizon.
This is one of the most complicated things to resolve because I don't know if the stars are inside or outside the firmament, or how that would effect it. However, even if we fail to explain it, it doesn't mean that the earth is a spinning ball suddenly, to many other proofs against that for me to believe it anymore.
Well it's not just the stars spinning in opposite directions on north and south pole
Water flows in opposite direction in toilet
Also some stars you can see in south hemisphere that you cant in northern. because Earth is round.
Also, if you get on a high elevation, you cannot see far enough into the distance as you should be able to if the Earth was flat. Especially from top of a mountain.
Also, it's unbelievable that someone wouldn't be able to reach the boundary of this so called dome firmament. Near the ice walls it should be easy to breach the lower end of the curve.
Then there's the problem with tides. The moon causes tides. What does flat earth model use to explain tides?
Also, I don't really trust any of the flat earth maps. Like that guy said. Where's the professional flat earth map with the scale that we can test out?
Like I said. I'm not claiming to be smarter than anyone. I'm just not convinced of the flat earth model, even though I find it interesting.
So you are saying the UN has covered with military every inch of the circle's perimeter?
What is the earth's pwrimeter then?