Please provide any images of space you believe are real. This can be images of Earth, other planets, satellites, ISS, far side of the moon, Tesla in space etc. But it has to be pictures that cannot be produced from earth or a spy plane at high altitude. Personally I think all planets are shitty CGI, all moonwalking footage was in a Hollywood studio, mars is simply devon Island Canada with a red tint. We have thousands of satellites in space (allegedly), so we should have clearly real photos of just about everything in our solar system, in addition to live streams and video. Hopefully we can debate the credibility of some pictures/video.
PS Flat Earth Society is a government psyop meant to mislead anyone looking into this issue, so real Flat earthers will not share their claims.
you tell me.... google maps don't qualify for what reason?
You need to provide pics that can only be taken from space, Google maps can (and is) created with spy planes. This disqualifies google maps. But if you were to provide a real picture of the entire earth floating in space, you would prove we really do have satellites with cameras in space.
PS, notice when you zoom far enough away on Google Earth, it shows you a computer generated earth. No images of globe Earth from space are real
Just receive them yourself, what is your problem? There are dozens of statellites at different orbits that continously openly transmit the realtime view of Earth from space for everyone who want to listen. All you need is just have to want to receive that transmissions on your own receiver and decode them on your own computer without any NASA, internet or whatever you afraid of.
If you don't want to do it - why do you made such post at all?
yes planes and satellites.
you believe google spent 500 million on Skybox Imaging ....to buy some planes? lol... ok... whatever...
how about this one - live from the ISS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86YLFOog4GM
Nasas budget is 24 billion this year, they have no problem buying spy planes and they publicly admit doing so. They also use thousands of balloon satellites that can stay aloft for 2 years, this is also public knowledge.
Good try, but notice it changes shots every 2 minutes. And there isn't even enough clarity to see if the weather and time of day match what is observable on earth. I can't verify anything with that. You can't even make out any landmarks on earth.
The ISS is in a huge green pool so they can film space walks while they are actually scuba diving.
Why don't you want to receive images from weather satellites, where you easily find all necessary landmarks and even could go out and compare the shape of clouds you see above you with what satellite just transmit you? You could even receive images from different satellites, US, European, Russian, Chineese, from middle orbit ones to geostationary that shows you whole Earth and compare what you rjust eceived with what is in skies above you.
All you need - a cheap RTL-SDR dongle, antenna made from garbage lying around and a weekend to play with that stuff.
If you "want know the truth", why don't you do something to check everything and find a answer yourself? Why do you need somebody who will give you a picture that literally falling on you continously from satellites above?
so? you think that live snapshots every 2 minutes somehow disqualifies the digital images?
like i said... you keep redrawing the goal post.
so... you win - good job. peace out.
of course it's computer generated... you think think they send-up film? and then what... drop it back down for development at the walgreens ?lol!
how about the mobile phone cam... you have... for selfies...
all your selfies are fake because they are computer generated - not kodak film - is your pitch ?
Digital pictures are fine. All nasas stuff is literally generated by graphic designers and looks less real than Avatar. That's one reason I call bullshit on the space program. Now quit arguing semantics a find a real picture of something in space... bitch.
ok so... digital is OK but no nasa.
hahah... nah mate you keep redrawing the line.
i give you a photo, you say it can't be nasa.
can it be russian government photos, or no government photos - only phots fm privately owned satalites?
i am just trying to understand the rules of your little mind game.
what say you?