I think it is really cute how even such a small forum as this one can attract so many leftist nutbars who all repeat the same jargon each time.
"You are not allowed to say this you should not say that, this is bad, gonna get free speech shut down."
Clearly here to try to dissuade anyone from mentioning the unmentionables, casually.
Even with shitty handshake accounts with no post history worth anything, these people feel they have ground to stand on with their bullshit, get real morons.
Feel free to call me whatever you like, I could not give a flying fuck. I post shit here because I find information interesting, access to knowledge is key, most of the people who do not collect information or understanding remain ignorant and are already leftists.
Generally disregarding any information that goes against the current belief set is a pattern we see in the ignorant.
It is fine, the reality is that the corruption of the systems is causing all the breakage and we are just here to talk about it and share pictures. I am not in control of the bullshit the idiots in life have created, I am a victim of societal choices, does not mean I submit my free will to acknowledge where truth lies.
What if the real ground the many ignore standing on represents the process of dying?
What if each one (perceiving) represents the center of all (perceivable)? Do attraction/repulsion require an enclosed system (balance) and does there exist as choice in-between them?
What is the one perceiving within all perceivable "not allowed to" and according to the suggestions of whom?
MENT (mind; memory) -TION (through action). What if those having a memory represent the reaction (perceiving) to an enacting system (perceivable)?
What if others could supplement (fill up mind) by means of suggestion?
That implies your choice of evaluation. What if the choice of evaluation can only exist at the center of every perceivable value (balance)?
What if emotions (feeling) tempt one to ignore being "free" will of choice? Those who ignore to be can be tempted by others who suggest them what they are.
What if everything (perceivable) is being already given to you (the one perceiving it)? What does one thing within every thing has to give?
a) what if suggested information tempts you to ignore being IN (within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action); hence in need to adapt to perceivable IN (within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) - ATION (through action)?
b) IN'TEREST, verb [Latin inter and esse.] - "within essence"; hence being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
What if access (perceiving) to knowledge (perceivable) is given; while the choice to adapt to perceivable inspiration represents the "key" to grow comprehension of perceivable? Furthermore; what if one doesn't need a key to unlock what's already open; but needs to resist the temptation to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction)?
Aren't the few suggesting the many to collect suggested information on the world wide web, and doesn't consenting to that suggested information represents the many standing under (understanding) the suggesting few?
What if accumulating information while standing under those suggesting it; is designed to stay ignorant of perceivable inspiration; freely available to each one perceiving it?
What if the living being set into the process of dying represents the only system perceivable; which others exploit by suggesting the inversion of singular (system)...plural (systems).
The sleight of hand...suggested operating systems within the same system operated by others.
If the ingredients to "create" were perceivable beforehand; then that implies transmutation (out of everything); not creation (out of nothing). Those who consent to suggested creationism ignore being the ingredient (living) within base (process of dying); which allows others to transmute them.
a) what if suggested choices represent a temptation to ignore being free will of choice, and what if consenting to suggested choices victimized oneself by falling for the temptation to ignore perceivable (balance) for suggested (choices)?
b) suggested SOCI'ETY, noun - "a number of persons united" tempts one to ignore UNITY; noun (Latin unitas) - "the state of being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable)".
If one ignores oneself for others; then that represents shirking of response-ability (choice) aka self sacrifice.
Can one or does one still have free will of choice within perceivable after submitting to the suggestions of others?