No such thing as Moses. Sargon of Akkad. Summerian. The Babylonian Talmud. Until Nehemiah built, or rebuilt the walls, Jerusalem has struggled to find any history, outside of a possible city state, mining copper, coexisting as Egyptian. Solomon, David didn't exist or were also somebody else. Like almost every other description. They were common stories adapted over time. It gets far more controversial with the people describing it. Of course there is some validity there needs to be just enough. But it isn't when it comes to it. It's a rewritten translation.
The Bible simply isn't fact. It claims Babylon destroyed Jerusalem. But in its description is largely Babylon being destroyed by Persia. Then afterwards there's recording upon Jerusalem being founded, it largely takes shape on it being rebuilt. It is then that the old testament was established. What happened prior are heaps of references changing over time, reworded from common stories. Did they occur, do they match descriptions. No real evidence proves this outside of much looser descriptions. What has been proved is it has been relayered.
Moses ten commandments are also Summerian. They're the code of laws by Hammurabi.
Egypt had also changed losing influence, upper and lower kingdoms fought. There is also the very controversial pharaoh who got cursed, didn't he kinda start the whole one god theme, declaring himself supreme.
Historically it all emerges there, Summerian, Egyptian. But it has changed over time. Western civilization and its modern basis, Christianity the record keepers. But when you quote stuff you need to have the knowledge it simply isn't what it seems. The facts behind it have evolved. Yes it is a good read and there is a sense of accuracy. But it simply isn't fact and cannot be claimed to be such.
Not getting into it. Believe what you want. Except it's as clear as day what that meant. The wandering star or comet.
If the ten commandments are Summerian, it is because they copied it off Moses. Lucifer wants to be like the most High, after all, so he copy that which the Bible says, as that describes who God is.
Code of laws by Hammurabi. Look it up. Sargon of Akkad. Look it up. Stop being superstitious gain some knowledge. Cain and Able are Enki and Enlil. So much more but no time to convince a believer. Your faith is ironclad I accept that. But I am not Satan.
Isn't it technically 13 commandments. Dumb film. 13 not 10.
The ten commandments is a reference to the commandments that God himself wrote on the stone tables with his finger. Of them there is ten. That one part of the Bible that was not written by men moved by the holy Ghost, but actually by God.
Stop it. There are technically 13, you dumbass. Look it up. Seriously there are 13.
But the code of laws came from Hammurabi. Because he invented them. Look it up. How is there that comparison. Because when Babylon got destroyed they didn't do a very good job of it. Unlike Jerusalem. But a bunch of tablets survived and they are the source. Why, they're much much much older. You see there's the Babylonian Talmud it is the source of the old testament. So when somebody else claims they're Moses but there's this other guy called the Sargon of Akkad on these tablets that weren't destroyed and the old testament was written when Jerusalem was built by Nehemiah and company. What went wrong. The translation did. And it was relayered much later. Read the story of the Sargon of Akkad, it is identical, like Hammurabi's code of laws. Oh dear. What else aren't they telling you, all of it, or part of it. The parts they want too, changing everything else, so it reads better. Does it? It begs belief, and your utmost faith. Never attention that's the work of Satan. He is anybody claiming anything else.
No such thing as Moses. Sargon of Akkad. Summerian. The Babylonian Talmud. Until Nehemiah built, or rebuilt the walls, Jerusalem has struggled to find any history, outside of a possible city state, mining copper, coexisting as Egyptian. Solomon, David didn't exist or were also somebody else. Like almost every other description. They were common stories adapted over time. It gets far more controversial with the people describing it. Of course there is some validity there needs to be just enough. But it isn't when it comes to it. It's a rewritten translation.
The Bible simply isn't fact. It claims Babylon destroyed Jerusalem. But in its description is largely Babylon being destroyed by Persia. Then afterwards there's recording upon Jerusalem being founded, it largely takes shape on it being rebuilt. It is then that the old testament was established. What happened prior are heaps of references changing over time, reworded from common stories. Did they occur, do they match descriptions. No real evidence proves this outside of much looser descriptions. What has been proved is it has been relayered.
Moses ten commandments are also Summerian. They're the code of laws by Hammurabi.
Egypt had also changed losing influence, upper and lower kingdoms fought. There is also the very controversial pharaoh who got cursed, didn't he kinda start the whole one god theme, declaring himself supreme.
Historically it all emerges there, Summerian, Egyptian. But it has changed over time. Western civilization and its modern basis, Christianity the record keepers. But when you quote stuff you need to have the knowledge it simply isn't what it seems. The facts behind it have evolved. Yes it is a good read and there is a sense of accuracy. But it simply isn't fact and cannot be claimed to be such.
Not getting into it. Believe what you want. Except it's as clear as day what that meant. The wandering star or comet.
If the ten commandments are Summerian, it is because they copied it off Moses. Lucifer wants to be like the most High, after all, so he copy that which the Bible says, as that describes who God is.
Code of laws by Hammurabi. Look it up. Sargon of Akkad. Look it up. Stop being superstitious gain some knowledge. Cain and Able are Enki and Enlil. So much more but no time to convince a believer. Your faith is ironclad I accept that. But I am not Satan.
Isn't it technically 13 commandments. Dumb film. 13 not 10.
The ten commandments is a reference to the commandments that God himself wrote on the stone tables with his finger. Of them there is ten. That one part of the Bible that was not written by men moved by the holy Ghost, but actually by God.
Stop it. There are technically 13, you dumbass. Look it up. Seriously there are 13.
But the code of laws came from Hammurabi. Because he invented them. Look it up. How is there that comparison. Because when Babylon got destroyed they didn't do a very good job of it. Unlike Jerusalem. But a bunch of tablets survived and they are the source. Why, they're much much much older. You see there's the Babylonian Talmud it is the source of the old testament. So when somebody else claims they're Moses but there's this other guy called the Sargon of Akkad on these tablets that weren't destroyed and the old testament was written when Jerusalem was built by Nehemiah and company. What went wrong. The translation did. And it was relayered much later. Read the story of the Sargon of Akkad, it is identical, like Hammurabi's code of laws. Oh dear. What else aren't they telling you, all of it, or part of it. The parts they want too, changing everything else, so it reads better. Does it? It begs belief, and your utmost faith. Never attention that's the work of Satan. He is anybody claiming anything else.