Code of laws by Hammurabi. Look it up. Sargon of Akkad. Look it up. Stop being superstitious gain some knowledge. Cain and Able are Enki and Enlil. So much more but no time to convince a believer. Your faith is ironclad I accept that. But I am not Satan.
Isn't it technically 13 commandments. Dumb film. 13 not 10.
The ten commandments is a reference to the commandments that God himself wrote on the stone tables with his finger. Of them there is ten. That one part of the Bible that was not written by men moved by the holy Ghost, but actually by God.
Stop it. There are technically 13, you dumbass. Look it up. Seriously there are 13.
But the code of laws came from Hammurabi. Because he invented them. Look it up. How is there that comparison. Because when Babylon got destroyed they didn't do a very good job of it. Unlike Jerusalem. But a bunch of tablets survived and they are the source. Why, they're much much much older. You see there's the Babylonian Talmud it is the source of the old testament. So when somebody else claims they're Moses but there's this other guy called the Sargon of Akkad on these tablets that weren't destroyed and the old testament was written when Jerusalem was built by Nehemiah and company. What went wrong. The translation did. And it was relayered much later. Read the story of the Sargon of Akkad, it is identical, like Hammurabi's code of laws. Oh dear. What else aren't they telling you, all of it, or part of it. The parts they want too, changing everything else, so it reads better. Does it? It begs belief, and your utmost faith. Never attention that's the work of Satan. He is anybody claiming anything else.
The Babylonian Talmud is a image of a golden calf, wormwood, the curse of the earth. Feel free to believe in it, but it leads to eternal damnation.
Doctrine of Sargon of Akkad and Hammurabi sounds like the imaginations of the heart of men, which is evil continually. Nothing new under the sun.
Nehemiah also had his problems with Sanballat, Tobiah and Geshem, laughing and scorning him, when he built the wall. But by faith, Nehemiah prevailed, and the wall around Jerusalem was finished. Some 62 weeks later, Jesus was anointed at the river Jordan, how about that.
Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken
When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.
But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state. Again documented by Shebba and Solomon. She came from the lower kingdom.
That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt, with their own kingdom and city state. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.
Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.
Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Summerian tablets are older. Sargon of Akkad, Hummurabi. But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.
That is a very simple explanation. There is no accurate history. The belief is otherwise ironclad religions. But there is a heap of controversy. Conflicting records and the source. The source as established was Babylonian. It became something else on refounding. We did that above.
Code of laws by Hammurabi. Look it up. Sargon of Akkad. Look it up. Stop being superstitious gain some knowledge. Cain and Able are Enki and Enlil. So much more but no time to convince a believer. Your faith is ironclad I accept that. But I am not Satan.
Isn't it technically 13 commandments. Dumb film. 13 not 10.
The ten commandments is a reference to the commandments that God himself wrote on the stone tables with his finger. Of them there is ten. That one part of the Bible that was not written by men moved by the holy Ghost, but actually by God.
Stop it. There are technically 13, you dumbass. Look it up. Seriously there are 13.
But the code of laws came from Hammurabi. Because he invented them. Look it up. How is there that comparison. Because when Babylon got destroyed they didn't do a very good job of it. Unlike Jerusalem. But a bunch of tablets survived and they are the source. Why, they're much much much older. You see there's the Babylonian Talmud it is the source of the old testament. So when somebody else claims they're Moses but there's this other guy called the Sargon of Akkad on these tablets that weren't destroyed and the old testament was written when Jerusalem was built by Nehemiah and company. What went wrong. The translation did. And it was relayered much later. Read the story of the Sargon of Akkad, it is identical, like Hammurabi's code of laws. Oh dear. What else aren't they telling you, all of it, or part of it. The parts they want too, changing everything else, so it reads better. Does it? It begs belief, and your utmost faith. Never attention that's the work of Satan. He is anybody claiming anything else.
The Babylonian Talmud is a image of a golden calf, wormwood, the curse of the earth. Feel free to believe in it, but it leads to eternal damnation.
Doctrine of Sargon of Akkad and Hammurabi sounds like the imaginations of the heart of men, which is evil continually. Nothing new under the sun.
Nehemiah also had his problems with Sanballat, Tobiah and Geshem, laughing and scorning him, when he built the wall. But by faith, Nehemiah prevailed, and the wall around Jerusalem was finished. Some 62 weeks later, Jesus was anointed at the river Jordan, how about that.
No, it's the source of the Old Testament.
Real simple where did Nehemiah come from. When Babylon was destroyed by Persia the refugees were supposedly allowed to return. You must know the story of Daniel in the Lion's den, advisor to Nebuchadnezzar. Refugees. Taken When Jerusalem Solomon's Temple was destroyed by Babylon. But were they taken under occupation when Babylon invaded Egypt and the surrounding City States. Babylon did this expanding its own Empire which again was old.
But Jerusalem documented was a copper mining town, this goes back thousands of years. Clear evidence of this. Who was it trading with if it was invaded and destroyed by Babylon. Never that Egypt it escaped from. Otherwise wouldn't it just make alliances. The enemy of my enemy. So it was provincially an Egyptian protectorate or city state. Again documented by Shebba and Solomon. She came from the lower kingdom.
That's if they even existed. No evidence of Solomon or David. Not a shred of evidence outside of belief. Instead it was rebuilt when Nehemiah returns. Otherwise it was this copper mining town. This is exactly when the old testament emerged. A bunch of refugees returning, many were intermarried Babylonians, or separate peoples. But they needed an identity. Needed a religion. Needed a home. Needed to establish themselves as separate to Egypt, with their own kingdom and city state. How long were they away as refugees in Babylon, so much longer.
Egypt had also had huge civil wars. Upper and lower losing influence and power. Big thing. Causing a break off. A dynasty wiped out. It spawned a pharaoh who later became cursed. He declared himself supreme after annihilating former influences. They had set up shop in the lower kingdom offending the upper kingdom. There are the lineage links into Ramses whatever that number etc. But not Moses no.
Who knows. Except there are a real conflict of records. The Summerian tablets are older. Sargon of Akkad, Hummurabi. But this guy Moses as a common story is similarly out in India. And around the globe in ancient tales of how they set up kingdoms. It of course is mythology.
That is a very simple explanation. There is no accurate history. The belief is otherwise ironclad religions. But there is a heap of controversy. Conflicting records and the source. The source as established was Babylonian. It became something else on refounding. We did that above.