SUN; SON; ONE...the value (wor) of the vessel (ship) represents evaluation. Each one represents the evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
illumination and the intellect
a) ILLUMIN (enlightened) -ATION (through action) implies as the reaction to perceivable light.
b) IN'TELLECT, noun [Latin intellectus, from intelligo, to understand.] implies ignoring perceivable for standing under (understanding) suggested; hence ignoring the light-bearer (luci-fer) aka comprehension of perceivable for darkness (ignorance). The PRINCE (sovereign) of DARKNESS (ignorance) represents free will of choice.
their own intellect
Translate this into "their own standing under others" and you have a contradiction at hand. The few gain ownership over each the many if each of the many chooses to "stand under" the suggestions of the few; hence following suggested orders instead of resisting the perceivable natural order.
They believe...
Who is suggesting the few what to believe? Believing represents consenting (by choice) to suggested (by choice); which by consenting gives the suggesting few the power over the many.
"I believe in..." ignores being perceiving within perceivable, hence reaction within enacting. No beliefs needed for adaptation to breathing; thirst; hunger and shelter. What's the implication for suggesting "I believe in breathing; thirst; hunger and shelter"? That ignores something; doesn't it?
They worship the light bringer
a) each one represents ship (vessel) within worth (wor) aka living within the process of dying.
b) each one is being brought by the light (living ignited by the process of dying aka heat generating light). One can perceive light and sound because one exists within perceivable light and sound.
SUN; SON; ONE...the value (wor) of the vessel (ship) represents evaluation. Each one represents the evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
a) ILLUMIN (enlightened) -ATION (through action) implies as the reaction to perceivable light.
b) IN'TELLECT, noun [Latin intellectus, from intelligo, to understand.] implies ignoring perceivable for standing under (understanding) suggested; hence ignoring the light-bearer (luci-fer) aka comprehension of perceivable for darkness (ignorance). The PRINCE (sovereign) of DARKNESS (ignorance) represents free will of choice.
Translate this into "their own standing under others" and you have a contradiction at hand. The few gain ownership over each the many if each of the many chooses to "stand under" the suggestions of the few; hence following suggested orders instead of resisting the perceivable natural order.
Who is suggesting the few what to believe? Believing represents consenting (by choice) to suggested (by choice); which by consenting gives the suggesting few the power over the many.
"I believe in..." ignores being perceiving within perceivable, hence reaction within enacting. No beliefs needed for adaptation to breathing; thirst; hunger and shelter. What's the implication for suggesting "I believe in breathing; thirst; hunger and shelter"? That ignores something; doesn't it?
a) each one represents ship (vessel) within worth (wor) aka living within the process of dying.
b) each one is being brought by the light (living ignited by the process of dying aka heat generating light). One can perceive light and sound because one exists within perceivable light and sound.