Carbon Dioxide Not a Well Mixed Gas and Can’t Cause Global Warming
(co2insanity.com)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Another issue is that there is more CO2 over cities - urban areas - but that non-cities area is far larger globally (land and ocean masses). Thus a model that assumes complete mixing is just wrong.
Other factors are that cities have less green matter than the country, where plants absorb CO2 and release oxygen, as in farms. So there are regional imbalances. The elite's / Left's climate 'science' is as much garbage as their medical 'science'.
More urban area than ever covers the Planet today. With it taller buildings, and far less green space, importantly roads, on roads, cars emit. Cities on average are far hotter in temperature than anywhere not urbanised. Farmland, agriculture sooner has the same problems, cropland without trees, and crops under constant rotation aren't absorbing CO2 instead are faster producing it.
The left's climate model isn't completely wrong, it's a sum of all parts. Rapidly gaining populations cause change. More infrastructure greater demand larger cities more crops. Less water. Then they begin altering the weather to cause rain or etc.
The main problem with the left's model is it cherry picks information instead of adding up all of it, including the current solar medium we are in. Because it projects fear to sell the solution, and it offers almost nothing else.
This is total bullshit by the way, I am sure you know that.
More total bullshit.
The problem with your logic here is that the design of the models are configured to fulfill the expectation they created. So there is no way to take a partial point from them, they are wrong, period.
The fear mongering around population causing issues is only correct if based on societal issues. Big government and big beliefs.
The belief that co2 is causing any degree of issue is baseless and incorrect, so there is no arguing an incorrect point regardless of feelings or what your rich mans research claims.
No, it isn't. Agriculture is producing a huge amount of C02 or reading the end of the article heat. Everyday air has the ability to retain heat.
You dumbass. Read your dumb comment. You just stated cities do this. At what point isn't cropland by your same reasoning? Cropland without trees under constant rotation. Cropland having deforested trees to plant crops, it has no sink, because it rotates. The plants aren't there for a year before they're chopped down, replanted again and again and again. So it does not absorb or mitigate C02. And it has a high concentration of livestock, without any real plant cover. It is fed on cropland being planted and chopped down. So in that infantile head of yours, it's not C02 causing this, fine. It's the normal air retaining heat. But it's the same as cities. Right. There is no sink. No trees. No plants of any growth. Instead there are crops rotating, and high concentrations of livestock producing what?
Again their model isn't completely wrong. We have warmer air. You're debating it can't be C02. What is it Einstein apart from the Sun.
More people more demand on things, without a sink, instead they produce warmer air. Cities, agriculture, transportation, flight. Genius. You have produced an oxymoron. So what is it? It ain't just the Sun either.
Until today we have gained far more population, every 30 years for the last 100 years, the global, in all of recorded planetary history has doubled its population. This has happened over night. Every 30 years doubling. Billions and Billions more, every few decades. They make the biggest cities in all of recorded history, with the tallest buildings ever created, they use the most agricultural land ever in history, they use the most water, and ground water, they have the most transportation, and they use flight, they use the most resources heavy products in history with the least lifetime. Even their stupid houses today last the shortest. But we have the least trees in history. No forests left that aren't losing land and are being uprooted. Sweden think they're geniuses, such hypocrites, hate Swedes, they think, but they'll regrow the forest, and then they cut it back down, it must be so much better, trees barely get to be little freaking Xmas trees before they're back at it, felling all the older trees, with all the apex predators in. We have no cover absorbing the as you admitted prior CO fucking 2. Meanwhile all the permafrost melting is releasing what into our atmosphere? Methane yes and Carbon. The warmer air is melting the permafrost, it is having a warming affect, where the permafrost has melted and it releases carbon. Until even our oceans have started producing more carbon. Like the retreating Amazon, and Sweden, hate them.
But oh no it isn't the carbon's fault, there isn't very much in our atmosphere. Just the most in history. It doesn't correlate into the increasingly rising temperature. Because humans don't cause warming?
Go back to your crayons. Take them out of your nose.
The problem is that the model is being used to sell bullshit. Brand new cars and more energy consumption won't change the weather or the human impact caused. It is having planetary affect. No matter what they do, or don't. And there are also plenty of other factors involved. Like our alignment. Regardless of humans this planet changes.
The point I fundamentally don't agree with is the naivety of a claim, that humans aren't responsible for their stewardship. They are. They have impacted a changing globe disastrously at their increasing rates of population and the demands caused. It has expedited change, changes to our globe. Whether or not we continue warm or rapidly cool. We play a part in nature.
This is the most simple stupid shit I have read in a while.
You clearly have no understanding of how shit really works and instead rely on fairy tales produced by the left to educate you.
Nothing what you fear here is anywhere near truth. You seem to have no comprehension on how prairies work, or what they have been doing for hundreds of thousands of years. You seem to believe everything you are told this is likely your biggest issue in life in general.
You continue to insinuate something is wrong 'off kilter' this is ridiculous, you are not able to produce anything meaningful to prove it, because it does not exist.
We work within the bounds of what is occurring, your belief that a few people on the planet and a slight change to the co2 content has any responsibility on anything to do with our climate with comparison to the sun that is not measured is beyond asinine.
The fact you believe any of the shit you push is a sad state for the blue haired left.
Look at reality, there is no change, the fear you are clambering does not belong in the rational world. The boogeyman you are scared of does not exist.
Eat the bugs, take your meds, you will be fine.
llihs
Yawn, you still have crayons and pencils up your nose.
Reread what you wrote. Where you admitted higher C02 concentration over cities. Your first post. Suddenly cropland doesn't, because normal air retains heat, the article's direct ending, normal air they did the gases nitrogen oxygen heat quicker. This is why black people should be charged a much higher carbon tax, rather than everybody else. Obviously they absorbed all the sunlight and then they direct it at the snowfall. This is why there's none in Africa today, not even on their highest mountains.
The article's direct ending. Normal air retains heat. Like black people. There's the 5,0. But according to yourself, farmland doesn't, and any cities which you've admitted, suddenly, mysteriously, brain spasm, look at that writing, suddenly they aren't on average +5 degrees hotter than the national averages. Where previously you stated, there is no tree cover. Because they have no carbon basins, they are continually pumping out heat, and everything else, like the black people, retaining the heat. No vegetation absorbing it. Tree cover. No, cropland doesn't act as that carbon sink, it's stripped every year, planted, often stripped again. It's not a carbon basin. What about everywhere else today. Like the permafrost melting. The Amazon shrinking, and Sweden putting black people into the Arctic.
At what fucking point hasn't it made sense to you. When I joke about the black people obviously. Air retaining the heat. It's the sun's fault. It warms our air all by itself, no matter how many black people retain the heat?
Come on. You sound ridiculous. What else is causing it.
I think you are just insane and there is no way to explain anything to you. Carry on bluehair.
No, but you are. We proved it. With all the black people retaining the Sun's heat. Or did you want to blame the carbon? Still black people's fault.
No, seriously. Come on. It's a larger combination of factors that we all have a hand in.
But it doesn't mean I agree with the solution at all. Throwing more electricity at it. Yawn.
It's black people's fault. Everyday air has the ability to retain the heat.