a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for the "chain" of command pyramid scheme; hence the willing submission of will to will aka the shirking of response-ability (choice) within a balance based system.
b) love vs hate represents the rebranding wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of others. All perceivable implies predefined inspiration; which doesn't require one to want (love) or not want (hate) it; but the need to adapt to it for sustenance of self.
Does living within the process of dying imply going along to get along or does it imply resisting (living) temptation (dying)? It's the suggestion of others which tempt the many to follow the few who suggest progressivism.
I think that "sustenance of self" requires significantly less external inputs than most would expect.
Everything externally perceivable represent inspiration (moving differences); yet simultaneously the motion which moves life from inception towards death; also represents temptation.
How to sustain self within temptation? By resisting it, and what does resistance require? Perceivable inspiration to resist.
Everything perceivable represents enacting need and want (balance) for the reacting choice at the center. Self sustenance requires as "little" as ones choice of need (perceivable) over want (suggested); yet the temptation to ignore need for want is called "bliss"; because it's a) easier to fall for temptation than the struggle to resist it and b) ignoring perceivable represses comprehension thereof aka the more one ignores; the less one comprehends of what one ignores...a blissful state for those under the influence of ignorance.
the confines of the current system
a) life being moved from inception towards death represents the only "current".
b) the momentum (balance) of enacting flow (inception towards death) represents the confinement for the reacting (choice) form (life).
c) society aka the suggested beast system aka a pyramid scheme aka a chain of command aka the self eating ouroboros aka KIKE; noun - "a visible sign of an invisible bond" represents the exploitation of the many by the few through choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. All the suggested narratives represent a distraction from the willing self destruction of the many; who follow the suggested orders of the few. The ignorant many are being farmed; harvested and transmuted back to base.
most could accumulate
That represents the temptation to ignore need for want. Everything one needs is offered at any moment to everyone within. It's the parasitic few who suggest the tempting convenience to accumulate; which in return grows dependency to suggested convenience; which in return corrupts into suggested inconvenience.
to extricate themselves from society
One needs to express growth within perceivable balance by adaptation to it as free will of choice; not trying to extricate oneself from the suggested choices by others, because one doesn't want to follow them.
It doesn't matter if you want or not want the suggested laws of men; only that you adapt to the perceivable laws of nature; which requires the struggle to resist the temptation of everything suggested...a struggle from inception till death.
if they really wanted to.
There it is again...want over need. Ones choice to ignore perceivable reality for suggested fiction.
Those who choose want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration) ignore reality for fiction....a fiction defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by the parasitic few suggesting it to the ignorant many consenting to it.
a) the foundation of trust represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which tempts one to ignore being choice (perceiving) within balance (perceivable) under natural law.
b) "do not" aka doing nothing represents a suggested state; for which you ignore being done (living) by everything (process of dying).
Petty sure most people would love to live at least mostly off their own piece of land but for the vast majority that's basically impossible at this point and for several reasons that regular people have no real control over. Of course TPTB want everyone to think that everyone else just loves their ball and chain. Look at how much pushback there is currently of office type employees over being told to come back to the office. They don't want to be there, they want to work from home, they want to be home. And these are city folk, who vacation to beaches, mountains, forests, etc mind you. Don't believe the lie. Most people want a more natural and simple life. They just don't think it's possible anymore.
Ones choice to ignore that everything perceivable constantly changes; while consenting to the affixed state of suggested nothingness...that contains one within a self destructive cycle.
meme
1st pic: not want suggested
2nd pic: using suggestion to explain perceivable
3rd pic: want the suggested over the perceivable
4th pic: want the suggested
Each of them represents a partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable); yet they are being tempted to consent to suggested systems (society; religion; culture; ideology etc.)...systems defined; redefined and contradicted through the suggestions of the few; while sustained by the consent of the many participating in it.
a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for the "chain" of command pyramid scheme; hence the willing submission of will to will aka the shirking of response-ability (choice) within a balance based system.
b) love vs hate represents the rebranding wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of others. All perceivable implies predefined inspiration; which doesn't require one to want (love) or not want (hate) it; but the need to adapt to it for sustenance of self.
Does living within the process of dying imply going along to get along or does it imply resisting (living) temptation (dying)? It's the suggestion of others which tempt the many to follow the few who suggest progressivism.
Everything externally perceivable represent inspiration (moving differences); yet simultaneously the motion which moves life from inception towards death; also represents temptation.
How to sustain self within temptation? By resisting it, and what does resistance require? Perceivable inspiration to resist.
Everything perceivable represents enacting need and want (balance) for the reacting choice at the center. Self sustenance requires as "little" as ones choice of need (perceivable) over want (suggested); yet the temptation to ignore need for want is called "bliss"; because it's a) easier to fall for temptation than the struggle to resist it and b) ignoring perceivable represses comprehension thereof aka the more one ignores; the less one comprehends of what one ignores...a blissful state for those under the influence of ignorance.
a) life being moved from inception towards death represents the only "current".
b) the momentum (balance) of enacting flow (inception towards death) represents the confinement for the reacting (choice) form (life).
c) society aka the suggested beast system aka a pyramid scheme aka a chain of command aka the self eating ouroboros aka KIKE; noun - "a visible sign of an invisible bond" represents the exploitation of the many by the few through choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. All the suggested narratives represent a distraction from the willing self destruction of the many; who follow the suggested orders of the few. The ignorant many are being farmed; harvested and transmuted back to base.
That represents the temptation to ignore need for want. Everything one needs is offered at any moment to everyone within. It's the parasitic few who suggest the tempting convenience to accumulate; which in return grows dependency to suggested convenience; which in return corrupts into suggested inconvenience.
One needs to express growth within perceivable balance by adaptation to it as free will of choice; not trying to extricate oneself from the suggested choices by others, because one doesn't want to follow them.
It doesn't matter if you want or not want the suggested laws of men; only that you adapt to the perceivable laws of nature; which requires the struggle to resist the temptation of everything suggested...a struggle from inception till death.
There it is again...want over need. Ones choice to ignore perceivable reality for suggested fiction.
Those who choose want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration) ignore reality for fiction....a fiction defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted (talmudic reasoning) by the parasitic few suggesting it to the ignorant many consenting to it.
a) the foundation of trust represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which tempts one to ignore being choice (perceiving) within balance (perceivable) under natural law.
b) "do not" aka doing nothing represents a suggested state; for which you ignore being done (living) by everything (process of dying).
Ask yourself who you trust that "nothing" exists?
Petty sure most people would love to live at least mostly off their own piece of land but for the vast majority that's basically impossible at this point and for several reasons that regular people have no real control over. Of course TPTB want everyone to think that everyone else just loves their ball and chain. Look at how much pushback there is currently of office type employees over being told to come back to the office. They don't want to be there, they want to work from home, they want to be home. And these are city folk, who vacation to beaches, mountains, forests, etc mind you. Don't believe the lie. Most people want a more natural and simple life. They just don't think it's possible anymore.
What can the temporary (living) within the ongoing (process of dying) own that isn't being taken away through progression?
is that meme racist? not sure wurh to put my rage-levels at.
nope
FOUND THE RACIST-SIMPLIFIER.
man! you got me and thank you for saying in upper case so everyone could hear
Ones choice to ignore that everything perceivable constantly changes; while consenting to the affixed state of suggested nothingness...that contains one within a self destructive cycle.
1st pic: not want suggested
2nd pic: using suggestion to explain perceivable
3rd pic: want the suggested over the perceivable
4th pic: want the suggested
Each of them represents a partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable); yet they are being tempted to consent to suggested systems (society; religion; culture; ideology etc.)...systems defined; redefined and contradicted through the suggestions of the few; while sustained by the consent of the many participating in it.