Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

3
If you doubt Tesla's engineering then you need to watch this (www.youtube.com)
posted 3 years ago by sep11insidejob 3 years ago by sep11insidejob +6 / -3
56 comments share
56 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Any casting or machined metal in the Tesla would have to be flawless internally.

Only rotor. And that is not that hard.

At 18K, ball bearings would need forced lubrication, as the centrifugal force would strip them of lube very soon

Or you should use sealed ball bearings. Also, centrifugal force for bearing much less that for the rotor, since diameter of rotating parts is much smaller. Vaccum cleaner turbines runs at 20-30K RPM, and ball bearings perfecly OK without forced lubrication for many years. SKF gives limiting speed for randomly taken W628/8-2Z bearing at 45K RPM f.e.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DZP1 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I had the wrong model. I was envisioning the rotor running in a planetary outer bearing race but with the hub connected to the wheel. But that's wrong because it couldn't be direct drive, the wheel does not turn at 18K rpm of course. I'm going to have to go research the per-wheel drive train.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It's a bad idea to put huge mass of motor into the wheel. You should keep unsprung mass as low as possible. AFAIK, Teslas have usual wheels with CV joint ended semiaxles connected to differential - reduction gear - motor assembly. That assembly looks like letter T, where top bar ends is a motor and reductor and vertical bas is differential. Nice and simple design, but everything is totally ruined by unsing highly ineffective and insane expensive chemical battery with ridiculously low energy density as power source for that nice drivetrain, making all thing senseless. Electric passenger cars have no future unless normal power source will be invented.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DZP1 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Yes. I had just researched the motor-to-wheel connection, which looks a bit weird but now I see there is a simple fixed gear reduction in the housings. Instead of the complex mechanism in a gas vehicle transmission, the speed reduction from the electric motor is handled by simple fixed gears and computer control of the motor speed.

Now as for the power, we are still waiting for Doc Brown to release the Mr Fusion powerplant to use instead of batteries.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

the speed reduction from the electric motor is handled by simple fixed gears and computer control of the motor speed.

Yep. And if you use asyncronous motor or synchronous reluctance motor it is also extremely cheap and reliable, since the only copper is in stator windings, there are no expensive rare-earth magnets and there are no brushes. Also, electric motors have high torque at 0 RPM, so no any need for clutch.

Now as for the power, we are still waiting for Doc Brown to release the Mr Fusion powerplant to use instead of batteries.

Power source should be of same simplicity, reliability and cheapness, and there could be huge breakthrough in our means of transportation.

And if we are talking about Doc Brown, the flying option will be necessary too. It is much easier to fly even, on some small old Cessna/Piper/Beechcraft, than to drive the most advanced car. :)

PS: IIRC, Doc Brown didn;t invent Mr.Fusion and flying option, he upgraded car in the future. And since his future with flying cars and other stuff was in 2015 we are definitely in some wrong and weird timeline.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy