Because they are tempted to respond to any suggestion by wanting (believing) or not wanting (not believing) it. Both responses ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
The few use suggestion to tempt the many into the want vs not want conflict of reason against each other.
The WEF believes
The brand "WEF" was suggested by the few toward the many; and the consent of the many to want or not want it...sustains it.
at least claims to
Consider that the few pretend to proclaim a suggestion, and that the many consent to claim by wanting or not wanting it? It's the consent of the many towards suggestion which allows the few to take anything perceivable ignored without any resistance from the many. Why? Because the many are busy reasoning against each other about suggested claims (fiction); while ignore perceivable gains (reality).
In reality everything perceivable is coming in...hence through inception.
Let's rebrand a little...The brand "abortion" was suggested by the few toward the many; and the consent of the many to want (pro-choice) or not want it (pro-life)...sustains it.
For those who suggest "abortion" it doesn't matter which side the others consent to; since both sides will be busy reasoning against each other; while abortion continues undisturbed.
All brands represent suggested idols to tempt you to ignore that the perceivable reality doesn't brand anything. A "forest" grows fine without anyone branding it a forest; yet consenting to the suggested brand "forest" allows the parasitic few to keep the ignorant many divided about narratives like "rain-forest" or "forest fires".
The many are being mentally domesticated to respond to suggested brands instead of the perceivable; moving system they exist in. Suggestion represents the idolatry of perception; before the suggested word exists the perceivable sound. The many are being distracted by the suggested fiction of the few from responding to the perceivable reality.
The many view reality through the fictitious lens of the suggesting few; while the few are parasitically racketeering the ignorance of the many. The few farm the self destruction of the many.
Because they are tempted to respond to any suggestion by wanting (believing) or not wanting (not believing) it. Both responses ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
The few use suggestion to tempt the many into the want vs not want conflict of reason against each other.
The brand "WEF" was suggested by the few toward the many; and the consent of the many to want or not want it...sustains it.
Consider that the few pretend to proclaim a suggestion, and that the many consent to claim by wanting or not wanting it? It's the consent of the many towards suggestion which allows the few to take anything perceivable ignored without any resistance from the many. Why? Because the many are busy reasoning against each other about suggested claims (fiction); while ignore perceivable gains (reality).
In reality everything perceivable is coming in...hence through inception.
????
WTF is this supposed to mean?
Let's rebrand a little...The brand "abortion" was suggested by the few toward the many; and the consent of the many to want (pro-choice) or not want it (pro-life)...sustains it.
For those who suggest "abortion" it doesn't matter which side the others consent to; since both sides will be busy reasoning against each other; while abortion continues undisturbed.
All brands represent suggested idols to tempt you to ignore that the perceivable reality doesn't brand anything. A "forest" grows fine without anyone branding it a forest; yet consenting to the suggested brand "forest" allows the parasitic few to keep the ignorant many divided about narratives like "rain-forest" or "forest fires".
The many are being mentally domesticated to respond to suggested brands instead of the perceivable; moving system they exist in. Suggestion represents the idolatry of perception; before the suggested word exists the perceivable sound. The many are being distracted by the suggested fiction of the few from responding to the perceivable reality.
The many view reality through the fictitious lens of the suggesting few; while the few are parasitically racketeering the ignorance of the many. The few farm the self destruction of the many.