It's called normalization.
I can imagine that if you are Christian before the end of Rome you are treated as badly as a Transgender in the 1950s.
Of course the goal is to introduce a degenerate ideology, make it look like a good thing and use it to get you to tread on eggshells, and potentially use it to cause death or destruction. (LGBT ideologies are deliberately engineered to justify mass genocide, but Zionist God Emperors masquerading as "Catholics" starved BILLIONS of Europeans over a millenia, and covid world would end the same way after a decade)
In the past we burnt people by the stake if they worship Zeus. Now you can't even ask if someone is Gay or transgender under the fear of retribution. And if you go out without a mask you are equal to a leper. Times had never changed, so are the powers.
(Do I need to compare 4kids with the woke movement?)
Once all the chaos is over you'll integrate it into a part of your life, and the rest of your generations too.
Soon the number of people all over the world that you cannot even be ascertain of their gender or sexual preference will be around the same number as the ones who worship a God that tells the peasants how to live. And everyone will wear a mask outside soon.
Good luck, you'll need it. We think we're smart and enlightened but we're no different from them.
"The degenerate pariahs of society."
Consenting to those who suggest Christianity "e nomine" (in the name of) represents subscribing (submitting) to the authority of those who institute papacies as figureheads; leaders to tempt following; personas to attract cults etc.
Watching these muppets being build up; corrupting and crumble down distracts from RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; hence being bound by consent to those who suggest "e nomine" the lord thy God. That bond to the suggestions of others; while ignoring the perceivable origin of "the lord thy God" represents ignoring the first commandment.
What does it imply that the suggestion of a "papal authority" by others (not by the lord thy God) can tempt about half of Christians to yet again break the first commandment when consenting to those who suggest "e nomine"?
How can there an suggested order which cannot; when the perceivable natural order implies that everything can within?
Being a follower of the lord thy God implies reaction to enacting. Suggesting judgment upon the "actions" of others represents ignoring to react to perceivable origin.
How could CONDEMN, verb - "to disapprove, to doom, to devote; to pronounce to be utterly wrong; to utter a sentence of disapprobation against; to censure; to blame" by suggestion not be in ignorance of perceivable source? How can a believer in God disapprove of those God approved of without ignoring God?