That’s an interesting question, if you take the interviewee at their word, they are “indistinguishable” from us, but also genetically distinct, with an “offworld” origin, with exclusively in-group breeding amongst the “13 families”...
That kind of thought, along with the suppressed subject of giants, while also taking into consideration the “established science” of Neanderthal, Denisovan, Floresensis, etc “types” of humans, leads me to think that maybe the image presented by “star-trek” (every species is humanoid but has a culturally distinctive hat) might be closer to reality than we tend to think (lol)
That’s an interesting question, if you take the interviewee at their word, they are “indistinguishable” from us, but also genetically distinct, with an “offworld” origin, with exclusively in-group breeding amongst the “13 families”...
That kind of thought, along with the suppressed subject of giants, while also taking into consideration the “established science” of Neanderthal, Denisovan, Floresensis, etc “types” of humans, leads me to think that maybe the image presented by “star-trek” (every species is humanoid but has a culturally distinctive hat) might be closer to reality than we tend to think (lol)
What are your thoughts on the subject?
I'll help you here, my friend. If they or a minion of them, wherever, said it, it is the opposite of what they said. Complete opposite.