Must-read interview for anyOne who seeks the Truth
(www.wanttoknow.info)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
This is gonna keep me busy for a while...
FAM'ILY, noun [Latin familia.] - "the collective (formed by gathering) body of persons". That ignores that flow doesn't form by gathering; but through self differentiation; hence from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving). The line represents the fluidity of form.
LOY'AL, adjective [Latin lex, law.] aka undivided whole (dying) of natural law for the divided partial (living) within.
Military aka force over free will of choice by suggestion of curtailed choices.
Government aka to control (govern) mind (Latin mens; ment) through choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law.
Spiritual aka suggested spiritualism tempting submission over being resistance within perceivable SPIRIT; noun (Latin spiro) - "to breathe".
Scholarship aka suggestion of information to tempt choice to stand under (understanding) suggested choices.
Leadership aka leading followers of suggested information within the chain of command towards outcome (death); which tempts them to ignore resisting origin for sustenance of life.
Science aka suggested scientism (understanding information) over SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
Suggestion represents the key of the few into the memory of the consenting many.
a) ME'DIATE, adjective [Latin medius, middle.] represents suggested information in-between perceivable inspiration (whole) and those perceiving it (partial); which requires consent by choice to enter.
b) those who ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable) consent to give ownership over everything perceivable to those suggesting values (prices) upon that which is offered to "free" will of choice.
c) BASE, adjective - "low in place". The lowest place within the whole represents each partial. The lowest place within balance represents the center...choice. Suggested choices cover the free will of choice of those consenting to them; because they are tempted to ignore being choice within perceivable for submitting to suggested choices.
That ignores that living within the process of dying requires resistance to grow, so not towards orientation; but adaptation to origin. Progressivism is suggested to the many to tempt them to seek self destruction within loss (process of dying); while ignoring to grow (living).
about what? do better.
“Purported member of secret group sheds Light on various aspects of the world and life-as-you-think-you-know-it”
Do you really prefer that?
Yeah, I don't buy his whole "we have to be negative and do evil, even though we are light and love" bullshit.
Just like the shills on here. They're the least free among us. LOL
It explains the “necessity of evil” better than I’ve ever seen it explained (though obviously many have attempted to answer the question of “why does evil exist”-to varying degrees of satisfaction)
How do you grapple with that one?
Free will explains it all really.
There is no "necessity of evil".
And you don’t think that link tells an incredibly interesting “story” (or “explanation”) behind the existence of free will? You just pushed my question back slightly - why is free will a necessity in your world view? It isn’t really supported by the materialist-reductionist-Scientism world view, so you must have found some “story” you like as the explanation, am I right?
I didn't say free will was a necessity either.
So the existence of free-will explains the existence of evil...but free-will doesn’t... necessarily.... exist? Do I have that right? And that philosophy illuminates your understanding of existence how?
Not at all.
And I don't believe in the "materialist-reductionist-Scientism world view" either. Geez, quite a mouthful.
So wait, you’re rejecting this (the OP) understanding of the world, in favor of what, exactly?
And if it isn’t clear, I’m not posting this to suggest that all of it is literally true and it’s the explanation behind anything - it could be total non-sense - BUT - it’s probably the best explanation I’ve come across for many of these essential, and incredibly difficult, questions relating to our existence both physical and spiritual.
I guess part of the reason I posted it, is to see if anyone has come up with anything better?
Yes, maybe even add a little detail of which secret group and something less general than "various aspects of the world". Maybe, just maybe.. you might entice someone to actually click the article.
Maybe both titles suck... what would you go with? I want it to grab your attention without people preemptively sloughing it off as too “zany”...
I automatically will not click on a title that seems like click bait. I would try to at least inform the reader as to why the article may be of interest. Especially if you include "Must-read" in the title.
Perhaps I would go with:
"Great interview with a member of the Royal Family Bloodline. Rare insights into the lives of those who control the world."
Sorry I did not read the article so title might be unrelated to the content but you get what I am trying to say, I hope.
You should check it out! I even reposted with a (slightly?) better title