I mainly wanted to comment that Baal may mean lucifer in the Abrahamic religions.
But in the pagan ones (like Mesopotamia) Baal is the title given to the lead god.
Its only in the plagiarized collection of storys called the bible, do we find one true god. In all the pagan religions, there were multiple gods and they had their own caste system.
Still see this in many retelling's of the story today in things like greek, sanskrit, and native american legends.
Maybe the whole thing is satanic, but I feel like the elite worship something much older than 2000 years old. I feel like whatever it is they are worshipping is hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years old.
whatever it is they are worshiping is hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years old.
What if they don't put worth on the ship (vessel in motion); but comprehend that the motion represents the source for all perceivable value; while being a perceiving vessel within implies being the evaluation thereof?
What if the few trick the many to count suggested hence ignoring being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable)?
Put yourself into the perspective of being two thousand; a hundred thousand or a million years ago...wouldn't one exist at this perceivable moment(um) no matter the suggested year?
Its hard for me to watch videos like this haha.
I mainly wanted to comment that Baal may mean lucifer in the Abrahamic religions.
But in the pagan ones (like Mesopotamia) Baal is the title given to the lead god.
Its only in the plagiarized collection of storys called the bible, do we find one true god. In all the pagan religions, there were multiple gods and they had their own caste system.
Still see this in many retelling's of the story today in things like greek, sanskrit, and native american legends.
Maybe the whole thing is satanic, but I feel like the elite worship something much older than 2000 years old. I feel like whatever it is they are worshipping is hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years old.
What if they don't put worth on the ship (vessel in motion); but comprehend that the motion represents the source for all perceivable value; while being a perceiving vessel within implies being the evaluation thereof?
What if the few trick the many to count suggested hence ignoring being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable)?
Put yourself into the perspective of being two thousand; a hundred thousand or a million years ago...wouldn't one exist at this perceivable moment(um) no matter the suggested year?