Yet, the claims Wagh has made, have been independently verified by multiple teams of actual, real, verifiable PhD scientists (whom I've been following separately of Wagh).
So this begs the question: Is Wagh just a grifter? Or a plan to get in front of the story and discredit the independent findings of the other scientists?
Interesting to see how this unfolds.
Yet, the independent findings (e.g. no nitrogen/mRNA in the analyzed "vaccine" samples) remain as they are. For those interested digging deeper , I suggest replaying some of old live Lab session recordings by Kevin McCairn (PhD):
Folks should reconsider the whole idea of "discrediting." Fundamentally, the concept of "discrediting" assumes that there are people who can be taken at face value and their every word can be believed, as opposed to the "discredited" person or entity.
There aren't actually any people or organizations who can be blindly believed about anything. Even people who communicate diligently and in good faith are practically always mistaken about multiple important things, and the audience must realize that.
The mental habit of trying to find someone to believe blindly does not just prevent truthful discovery, but is negligent and deadly.
There are two Poornima Waghs in the US. The first one is a cancer researcher at the U Cincinnati medical school. She is Dr.Purnima K. Wagh and she is a PhD. Her publications are listed at researchgate.
The other is the Poornima S. Wagh. She DOES NOT have a PhD. She has 2 years of biology and microbiology at LA city College which she attended 2002-2004. She worked as a lab technician at the same college for two years. She also has a Masters of Business Administration from the U Alaska, Fairbanks and a BS in finance. She is the one spouting nonsense about viruses. SHE HAS NO PUBLICATIONS.
She owns and operates a financial services company.
In this fucked up world of PsyOps, lies upon lies and subterfuge - people just want to believe there is truth out there. And that can be an easy weakness to be exploited....
Search her name, correct spelling but without the middle "K", and there are plenty of hits about her allegations. In particular she seems to have upset Steve Kirsch.
Right now I have to assume that someone appropriated her name and misspelled it either deliberately or out of stupidity.
Bizarre that you wouldn't think to do a thorough search before jumping to a crazy conspiracy assumption instead. A little retarded, if you ask me.
My explanation is that you are incompetent at researching. I have to assume this since I easily found references discussing her claims, with her correctly spelled name, on my first attempt.
I also discovered the word "Purnima" is sanskrit for "full Moon" and indeed "Poornima" is an alternative spelling of the same word using the roman alphabet, so it's probably not a typo at all.
A website from the institute or company she is employed at.
List of her publications.
Proof that she is an Immunologist and PHD.
Why the fuck are you asking about newspapers? I ask about proof that the woman exists and has the credentials that are claimed. That has fuck all to do with CNN.
Even Purnima K Wagh. PhD is not an immunologist. She is a cancer researcher. Specializes in breast and lung cancer.
The other, Poornima S.Wagh only has a MS in Business Administration. See my comment, above.
Eric Coppoline can't verify Poornima Wagh's studies/credentials:
https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/charlatans-web
Yet, the claims Wagh has made, have been independently verified by multiple teams of actual, real, verifiable PhD scientists (whom I've been following separately of Wagh).
So this begs the question: Is Wagh just a grifter? Or a plan to get in front of the story and discredit the independent findings of the other scientists?
Interesting to see how this unfolds.
Yet, the independent findings (e.g. no nitrogen/mRNA in the analyzed "vaccine" samples) remain as they are. For those interested digging deeper , I suggest replaying some of old live Lab session recordings by Kevin McCairn (PhD):
https://www.wetalkyoulisten.com/streamer/99
http://www.mccairndojo.com
Folks should reconsider the whole idea of "discrediting." Fundamentally, the concept of "discrediting" assumes that there are people who can be taken at face value and their every word can be believed, as opposed to the "discredited" person or entity.
There aren't actually any people or organizations who can be blindly believed about anything. Even people who communicate diligently and in good faith are practically always mistaken about multiple important things, and the audience must realize that.
The mental habit of trying to find someone to believe blindly does not just prevent truthful discovery, but is negligent and deadly.
There are two Poornima Waghs in the US. The first one is a cancer researcher at the U Cincinnati medical school. She is Dr.Purnima K. Wagh and she is a PhD. Her publications are listed at researchgate. The other is the Poornima S. Wagh. She DOES NOT have a PhD. She has 2 years of biology and microbiology at LA city College which she attended 2002-2004. She worked as a lab technician at the same college for two years. She also has a Masters of Business Administration from the U Alaska, Fairbanks and a BS in finance. She is the one spouting nonsense about viruses. SHE HAS NO PUBLICATIONS. She owns and operates a financial services company.
Upvoted! TY!
Regis Tremblay interview with Poornima Wagh, PhD (x2). Uploaded July 9, 2022:
https://rumble.com/v1blsi3
Summary and remarks by The Good Citizen:
https://thegoodcitizen.substack.com/p/wheres-the-virus
The only evidence that this "immunologist Dr Poornima Wagh" even exists are conspiracy pages.
Where does she work and what has she published?
Her name is Purnima K. Wagh.
Her research:
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Purnima-K-Wagh-32038035
She works at: https://translationalcells.org/content/whitsett-cchmc-research-hub-06
Her mugshot (old): https://translationalcells.org/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/Purnima%20Pic.jpg?itok=x_2ql6TQ
She's real alright.
The future interviews will be interesting and will offer more possibilities for vetting her data and claims.
The longer interview is at:
https://rumble.com/v1blsi3-the-scamdemic-covid-19-sars-cov-2-the-virus-that-never-was.html
This is a different Ms. Wagh. See my comment above.
TY
Under that name there is nothing to be found about these allegations.
Right now I have to assume that someone appropriated her name and misspelled it either deliberately or out of stupidity.
It's possible, that's why I want to see/hear follow up interviews as well, along with some backing for the claims.
Good to be skeptical.
Exactly. Yet this page and others just take these claims at face value.
In this fucked up world of PsyOps, lies upon lies and subterfuge - people just want to believe there is truth out there. And that can be an easy weakness to be exploited....
Let's see how this develops.
Search her name, correct spelling but without the middle "K", and there are plenty of hits about her allegations. In particular she seems to have upset Steve Kirsch.
Bizarre that you wouldn't think to do a thorough search before jumping to a crazy conspiracy assumption instead. A little retarded, if you ask me.
This is not a crazy conspiracy assumption. There are 2 Poornima Waghs in the US. Purnima K. and Poornima S. See my comment above.
I have to assume it because under her correctly written name, I can find nothing about her making these kinds of claims.
What's your explanation for that?
My explanation is that you are incompetent at researching. I have to assume this since I easily found references discussing her claims, with her correctly spelled name, on my first attempt.
There is literally 0 evidence that this researcher is the woman that they claim is making these allegations.
You're a fucking looney.
I also discovered the word "Purnima" is sanskrit for "full Moon" and indeed "Poornima" is an alternative spelling of the same word using the roman alphabet, so it's probably not a typo at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purnima
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purnima_(disambiguation)
Amazing what you can find out when you don't leap to retarded assumptions.
See my comment, above. The woman is a fraud.
Oh so what would constitute non-conspiracy pages? CNN? The New York Times?
God damn I'm skeptical of this too but could you smell ANY LESS like a fucking paid plant to shit on the forum who's name is...conspiracies?
They really are scraping the bottom of the barrel. Makes me error on the side of this stuff even more with crap like this.
A website from the institute or company she is employed at.
List of her publications.
Proof that she is an Immunologist and PHD.
Why the fuck are you asking about newspapers? I ask about proof that the woman exists and has the credentials that are claimed. That has fuck all to do with CNN.
https://academictree.org/cellbio/publications.php?pid=247698
Is there just a typo of her name?
Good catch. Average rumble user spells as well as Baron Trump.
Under that name nothing about the allegations can be found.
Even Purnima K Wagh. PhD is not an immunologist. She is a cancer researcher. Specializes in breast and lung cancer. The other, Poornima S.Wagh only has a MS in Business Administration. See my comment, above.