Again, I didn't write that article or thread, I just provided a link because I thought it was interesting. Which it was.
You, however, did come up with the notion that this woman has stolen the identity of one Purnima Wagh... because of a perceived typo... with zero proper searching or evidence to indicate such.. in fact ignoring evidence to the contrary...
There is literally 0 evidence that this researcher is the woman that they claim is making these allegations.
You're a fucking looney.
Kek.
Tell me more about the "satanic" Hoover dam and then we can decide who's the looney.
Again, I didn't write that article or thread, I just provided a link because I thought it was interesting. Which it was.
You, however, did come up with the notion that this woman has stolen the identity of one Purnima Wagh... because of a perceived typo... with zero proper searching or evidence to indicate such.. in fact ignoring evidence to the contrary...
lmao. what a loon..