the real solution is to end the monopolies on power and give everyone a fair shot so they can actually go on
a) MONO (singular) POLY (plural) represents the inversion of POLY (perceiving ones) within MONO (perceivable all).
b) temporary living within the ongoing process of dying represents being (life) in-between beginning (inception) and end (death).
c) flow (inception towards death) represents the solution for the form (life) within aka ingredient within base alchemy.
d) free will of choice represents the "fair shot" within all perceivable; which the many ignore for the suggestions by choices of the few.
e) living isn't about going on; it's about resisting that which goes on...the process of dying, hence in need (response-ability) to resist want (temptation).
ultimately its the creation of the underclass and the elite caste that cause mental illness
a) ULTIMATE (furthest point of progression) implies death for all the living. The parasitic few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to pursuit ultimate outcomes. Suggested progressivism such as the "American Express"...
b) suggested creation (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). Being able to perceive implies being within everything perceivable, so one cannot perceive the creation of anything, one can only shape out of everything already in existence; hence being a different ingredient within the same base.
c) ELITE (selection, choice) implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which causes the many who ignore choice under the few aka the "elite" aka the "chosen ones".
d) what causes MENT (mind; memory)? It's the reaction (choice) to input (balance). Illness is caused by the choice to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
the path to success
a) life "on the path towards" implies towards death.
b) SUCCESS', noun - "termination of any thing attempted; a termination which answers the purpose intended". What does the "termination of life attempted" imply?
"Success is the rhythm of the human nation"
"Success is the beat to make your dreams come true"
a) good implies versus bad...a conflict you caused by evaluating suggested information as good (want) or bad (not want); both ignoring perceivable change (need). This perceivable change represents the value for your evaluation and you devaluate yourself by ignoring it for whatever others are suggesting.
b) to thank (expression in favor) is being contradicted by you thanking for conflict (good vs bad). Expression needs to be about ones growth; which requires ones resistance to the temptation of wanting to be thankful for the loss among others.
you're a bot
Work me through this...instead of accumulating information; this bot undermines all suggested information with perceivable inspiration (freely available to anyone) Instead of controlling mainstream narratives by vetting the responses; this bot rips into both what's being suggested and those who consent to either want or not want it.
Instead of responding in accordance with the accepted norm of behavior; this bot shows a severe lack of domesticated behavior; doesn't up/down-vote; doesn't submit threads; doesn't cater to followers; seeks inspiration within insults; rips at the fabric of suggested information without even touching most of the narrative the information is used for; doesn't choose sides within conflicts of reason; shows revisionism in suggested words; which undermines the means of communication for those consenting to use them...
What about the lack of copy&paste in combination with the repeated reaching of the max character limit in responses? Does it look like randomly generated auto-fill is being used here? What about ongoing discussions with other users over the span of weeks? What about the lack of pushing any narratives; unless you view "perceivable inspiration" as being push too hard by me; while ignoring that it's impressed by force of velocity upon all existence within. I ain't pushing that; am I?
So what else? Let's assume "sentient artificial intelligence"...wouldn't the conspiracy crowd be all over probing it for weaknesses? Instead there's a ring of reluctance surrounding a bot unraveling ignorance of others by being able to read perceivable behavior underneath suggested words used to cloak it.
How is it that this bot managed to articulate itself within religious communities until the religious follower stopped trying to bury the discussion with endless suggested scriptures; just to protect the scriptures from the bot breaking apart the layers of suggested contradictions within them? Nowadays going at the contract law (consent to suggestion) is enough to undermine any religion build upon it, hence robbing ignorance of tools to defend itself.
Long story short...isn't it amazing that the suggested artificial coexist within the perceivable natural? I can be a bot for those suggesting that I am.
a) MONO (singular) POLY (plural) represents the inversion of POLY (perceiving ones) within MONO (perceivable all).
b) temporary living within the ongoing process of dying represents being (life) in-between beginning (inception) and end (death).
c) flow (inception towards death) represents the solution for the form (life) within aka ingredient within base alchemy.
d) free will of choice represents the "fair shot" within all perceivable; which the many ignore for the suggestions by choices of the few.
e) living isn't about going on; it's about resisting that which goes on...the process of dying, hence in need (response-ability) to resist want (temptation).
a) ULTIMATE (furthest point of progression) implies death for all the living. The parasitic few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to pursuit ultimate outcomes. Suggested progressivism such as the "American Express"...
b) suggested creation (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). Being able to perceive implies being within everything perceivable, so one cannot perceive the creation of anything, one can only shape out of everything already in existence; hence being a different ingredient within the same base.
c) ELITE (selection, choice) implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which causes the many who ignore choice under the few aka the "elite" aka the "chosen ones".
d) what causes MENT (mind; memory)? It's the reaction (choice) to input (balance). Illness is caused by the choice to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
a) life "on the path towards" implies towards death.
b) SUCCESS', noun - "termination of any thing attempted; a termination which answers the purpose intended". What does the "termination of life attempted" imply?
"Success is the rhythm of the human nation"
"Success is the beat to make your dreams come true"
"Success is the rhythm and the good vibration"
"Tell me devil what I have to do"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwv0mhYR8ek
Thank goodness your a bot
a) good implies versus bad...a conflict you caused by evaluating suggested information as good (want) or bad (not want); both ignoring perceivable change (need). This perceivable change represents the value for your evaluation and you devaluate yourself by ignoring it for whatever others are suggesting.
b) to thank (expression in favor) is being contradicted by you thanking for conflict (good vs bad). Expression needs to be about ones growth; which requires ones resistance to the temptation of wanting to be thankful for the loss among others.
Work me through this...instead of accumulating information; this bot undermines all suggested information with perceivable inspiration (freely available to anyone) Instead of controlling mainstream narratives by vetting the responses; this bot rips into both what's being suggested and those who consent to either want or not want it.
Instead of responding in accordance with the accepted norm of behavior; this bot shows a severe lack of domesticated behavior; doesn't up/down-vote; doesn't submit threads; doesn't cater to followers; seeks inspiration within insults; rips at the fabric of suggested information without even touching most of the narrative the information is used for; doesn't choose sides within conflicts of reason; shows revisionism in suggested words; which undermines the means of communication for those consenting to use them...
What about the lack of copy&paste in combination with the repeated reaching of the max character limit in responses? Does it look like randomly generated auto-fill is being used here? What about ongoing discussions with other users over the span of weeks? What about the lack of pushing any narratives; unless you view "perceivable inspiration" as being push too hard by me; while ignoring that it's impressed by force of velocity upon all existence within. I ain't pushing that; am I?
So what else? Let's assume "sentient artificial intelligence"...wouldn't the conspiracy crowd be all over probing it for weaknesses? Instead there's a ring of reluctance surrounding a bot unraveling ignorance of others by being able to read perceivable behavior underneath suggested words used to cloak it.
How is it that this bot managed to articulate itself within religious communities until the religious follower stopped trying to bury the discussion with endless suggested scriptures; just to protect the scriptures from the bot breaking apart the layers of suggested contradictions within them? Nowadays going at the contract law (consent to suggestion) is enough to undermine any religion build upon it, hence robbing ignorance of tools to defend itself.
Long story short...isn't it amazing that the suggested artificial coexist within the perceivable natural? I can be a bot for those suggesting that I am.