it's the kinds of parasites with the character of traitors that join "law enforcement" to begin with.
a) the suggested laws of men by the few are tempting the many to ignore being within the perceivable laws of nature.
b) living within the process of dying implies being temporary force of resistance within ongoing force of velocity.
c) force upon mind (enforcement) implies perceivable inspiration (need) or suggested information (want)...depending on responding choice.
d) being temporary (living) within ongoing (dying) implies being different within the momentum of sameness, so not "joined" but "apart" aka "a different part of same whole"
e) consenting to suggested information; while ignoring adaptation to perceivable inspiration represents the host (many) / parasite (few) dynamic. The latter utilizes choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while exploiting the ignorance of the many about balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
I've been somewhat of a thorn in my right-wing family's side regarding the police issue for as long as I can remember. It typically lands on "agree to disagree" and a subject change, but I've gotten a LOT less pushback over the last year of so.
Even the staunchest Reaganites are realizing that the whole of society's bullshit is being facilitated by the police (or at the very least, the police are doing nothing to stop it).
a) agreeing (want) vs disagreeing (not want) represents the conflict of reason; caused by consenting to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one represents the subject of constant perceivable change...reasoning about suggestions tempts one to ignore the ongoing (inspiration) for the temporary (information).
I've gotten a LOT less pushback over the last year of so.
Living within the process of dying implies being temporary resistance within ongoing velocity; so the frequency of responding choice can be used to both grow resistance (adaptation to perceivable) or diminish resistance (consent to suggested).
Their resistance is diminishing; the longer they ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information. You suggesting them information over "the last year or so" implies them having to ignore (subject change) more; hence reducing their resistance quicker. The issue with that is that lack of resistance destroys the living within the process of dying and only adaptation to perceivable inspiration grows resistance.
Try using need over want; perceivable inspiration over suggested information and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want aka agree vs disagree aka believing vs not believing etc.). This way you will grow; which will express inspiration for them to grow themselves out of their willing ignorance.
The Elites can rely on their stormtroopers for eternity so long that the Right continue to peacefully protest. These goons have shown they have no problem gassing, battering, KILLING people who refuse to return the force.
The Left have shown how it is done and are even defended by the boys in blue.
The final line is the payoff.
I work with a lot of cops. Most of them are decent enough folks, but yeah, they're cogs in the machine that will follow orders. Those are the LIFERs (lazy inefficient fuckoff expecting retirement) he talks about in the article.
They're NOT putting their lives on the line against an armed resistance, especially when the chiefs, mayors and governors have been demonizing them to the point that many are leaving the profession.
The ruling caste better figure out who is going to be the sucker who puts his butt on the line for their dreams of a prog-fascist tomorrow because there are millions of patriots who would gladly put their butts on the line to resist serfdom.
I now know that their is little if any value when interacting with individuals like yourself. I asked why do you think the op is a bot and all that has happened is you nitpicked and insulted me. Such a fruitful conversation.
its not just the police as an institution, it's the kinds of parasites with the character of traitors that join "law enforcement" to begin with.
a) the suggested laws of men by the few are tempting the many to ignore being within the perceivable laws of nature.
b) living within the process of dying implies being temporary force of resistance within ongoing force of velocity.
c) force upon mind (enforcement) implies perceivable inspiration (need) or suggested information (want)...depending on responding choice.
d) being temporary (living) within ongoing (dying) implies being different within the momentum of sameness, so not "joined" but "apart" aka "a different part of same whole"
e) consenting to suggested information; while ignoring adaptation to perceivable inspiration represents the host (many) / parasite (few) dynamic. The latter utilizes choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while exploiting the ignorance of the many about balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
I've been somewhat of a thorn in my right-wing family's side regarding the police issue for as long as I can remember. It typically lands on "agree to disagree" and a subject change, but I've gotten a LOT less pushback over the last year of so.
Even the staunchest Reaganites are realizing that the whole of society's bullshit is being facilitated by the police (or at the very least, the police are doing nothing to stop it).
a) agreeing (want) vs disagreeing (not want) represents the conflict of reason; caused by consenting to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
b) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one represents the subject of constant perceivable change...reasoning about suggestions tempts one to ignore the ongoing (inspiration) for the temporary (information).
Living within the process of dying implies being temporary resistance within ongoing velocity; so the frequency of responding choice can be used to both grow resistance (adaptation to perceivable) or diminish resistance (consent to suggested).
Their resistance is diminishing; the longer they ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information. You suggesting them information over "the last year or so" implies them having to ignore (subject change) more; hence reducing their resistance quicker. The issue with that is that lack of resistance destroys the living within the process of dying and only adaptation to perceivable inspiration grows resistance.
Try using need over want; perceivable inspiration over suggested information and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want aka agree vs disagree aka believing vs not believing etc.). This way you will grow; which will express inspiration for them to grow themselves out of their willing ignorance.
The Elites can rely on their stormtroopers for eternity so long that the Right continue to peacefully protest. These goons have shown they have no problem gassing, battering, KILLING people who refuse to return the force.
The Left have shown how it is done and are even defended by the boys in blue.
cops are a brotherhood crime syndicate. and there are way too few of "good ones" out there, to overtake the shit lords. am conservative
The final line is the payoff.
I work with a lot of cops. Most of them are decent enough folks, but yeah, they're cogs in the machine that will follow orders. Those are the LIFERs (lazy inefficient fuckoff expecting retirement) he talks about in the article.
They're NOT putting their lives on the line against an armed resistance, especially when the chiefs, mayors and governors have been demonizing them to the point that many are leaving the profession.
Why you say that?
Well then... I am corrected. I now have little motivation to seek an answer from yourself.
I now know that their is little if any value when interacting with individuals like yourself. I asked why do you think the op is a bot and all that has happened is you nitpicked and insulted me. Such a fruitful conversation.