His decision doesn't count unless he had informed consent. It sounds like he consented without information, which I suspect they deliberately withheld from him (because that's how all of this works). Once he found out the potential side effects they didn't mention, he was rightly pissed off.
It's the doctor's responsibility to provide the patient with the risks and benefits of the treatment, and then after the patient has had time to chew on that information, the patient has a right to accept or reject the treatment. In nearly every case, all over the world, they're just jabbin' and stabbin' with very little information trading hands.
When I was a teen back in the 90s, I was required to take a handful of vaccines for my college scholarship (had to live on campus). My mom never trusted doctors and I remember her asking the doctor if there were any side effects to the vaccines. He gave her some bullshit brochure saying they were amazing. She insisted there must be something more detailed. He said no, she will be fine. I wasn't. I nearly died. She asked him again and got crazy insistent. He gave her the inserts and then marked in the scheduling system that we were no longer to be seen there. She was so livid but there was nothing we could do.
I still live with the consequences but she and I will never take a vaccine and we do not vaccinate our cats. Vaccines do not work as they say and can certainly do more harm than good.
Thanks for your story and sorry that this happened to you.
Every anti-vaxxer is actually a former vaxxer with a story to tell. Nobody woke up one day hating vaccines for no reason, as the media would have you believe.
It's not "informed consumption", dumbass. The doctor must tell you about the medicine they are trying to give you, warts and all. Every doctor on earth, except the ones getting canceled, are doing it wrong and putting people in danger. I'm not saying it kills everyone, I'm saying the risk of harm must be recognized.
Coerced people were forced through travel bans and job losses. They have a right to be mad.
The system implied "safe and effective" but hid a fraud perpetrated by politicians, public health and media that did not disclose the negative effects. When dealing with public health if fraud is committed it vitiates any protections. Those that were aware of the fraud but hid it are now accountable.
It's interesting that pfizer is trying to get a court case thrown out based on the fact that the government were fully aware of the issues with the vaccines and flaws in the studies but did not understand that there were risks so the fraud was on the public health departments and not with pfizer. Let's see how that plays out.
Except for the mandates for travel that seems logical, but if you are an owner operator who must travel to deliver goods essentially those mandates change your standard of living. Any government emposed mandate is irrevocable coercion and can be considered undo duress. The supreme court many choose to go the right way once the fraud of the jabs is fully exposed especially if the government agencies were aware whitch pfizer has indicated in court is the case.
No. People who are paid lots and lots of money to help him protect his health did lie to him in order to convince him to get it.
I didn't get the vaxx, so I won't be seeking any retribution. But I'm smart enough to know that these medical personnel deserve whatever revenge their victims may visit upon them
You're a pretty big douchebag, huh? Single, fat, dropout, no reading comprehension? I hit it right on the head, didn't I? I wouldn't get too cocky, there, skidmark, this may happen to YOU one day. Smooches!
Not condoning violence, but let's continue the analogy.
If the dealer was given fake credibility, touted as a hero in the press, had the backing of all major institutions, had a medical degree...
And told them the shot was B12, but it was actually laced with heroin, intentionally given to get them addicted, then whatever they decide to do to the dealer is fine.
The doctors have an oath to do no harm. It's on them if they turn a blind eye. They have insurance against malpractice but that does not protect them from negligence.
Nobody coerced them into accepting the lies when enough of their associates raised an issue they were fully aware of the doctors being sanctioned for questioning the narrative and choosing to defer their obligations to an unaccountable bureaucratic system like public health.
Why are you comparing a perfectly safe opiate with whatever the fuck this shit shot is? If you look it up, and feel free to have mum help you with the Brittanica, you'll find that the amount of people who die of a simple heroin OD (prior to fent, so don't even try it) is really really low. That's because it's.. SAFE!! Start adding alcohol or coke or benzos, or whatever you fancy, and the danger increases exponentially. I mean, how come stupid-assed ME shot heroin for almost a decade and never even had so much as a close call? I'll tell you. I was CAREFUL always tasting it first and never doing too much. Also, as I said, it's generally safe. Do you really believe some douchebag is getting a kilo of fent in the mail from China and mixing it with whatever on their kitchen table? Seriously? How about this one! Do you believe China actually BANNED the manufacture of fentanyl? 😆🤣😆(That's what gives the whole China element away as bullshit.) Its being made stateside for basically NO MONEY and mixed haphazardly and killing tons and tons of people. Money AND lots of death for their little faggot goat god. Win win.
What's more, yes, probably one SHOULD beat up their heroin dealer if they are taking advantage, and let's just go on and be real. Where is the difference when they are no more than agents of the state anyways, right? How do you think said opiate gets into your country? Inside of the ass of some mule? You probably DO think that, don't you?
So, short answer, yes. Probably. Long answer, not valid since you probably wouldn't understand anyway.
He trusted the experts
His decision doesn't count unless he had informed consent. It sounds like he consented without information, which I suspect they deliberately withheld from him (because that's how all of this works). Once he found out the potential side effects they didn't mention, he was rightly pissed off.
It's the doctor's responsibility to provide the patient with the risks and benefits of the treatment, and then after the patient has had time to chew on that information, the patient has a right to accept or reject the treatment. In nearly every case, all over the world, they're just jabbin' and stabbin' with very little information trading hands.
When I was a teen back in the 90s, I was required to take a handful of vaccines for my college scholarship (had to live on campus). My mom never trusted doctors and I remember her asking the doctor if there were any side effects to the vaccines. He gave her some bullshit brochure saying they were amazing. She insisted there must be something more detailed. He said no, she will be fine. I wasn't. I nearly died. She asked him again and got crazy insistent. He gave her the inserts and then marked in the scheduling system that we were no longer to be seen there. She was so livid but there was nothing we could do.
I still live with the consequences but she and I will never take a vaccine and we do not vaccinate our cats. Vaccines do not work as they say and can certainly do more harm than good.
Thanks for your story and sorry that this happened to you.
Every anti-vaxxer is actually a former vaxxer with a story to tell. Nobody woke up one day hating vaccines for no reason, as the media would have you believe.
It's not "informed consumption", dumbass. The doctor must tell you about the medicine they are trying to give you, warts and all. Every doctor on earth, except the ones getting canceled, are doing it wrong and putting people in danger. I'm not saying it kills everyone, I'm saying the risk of harm must be recognized.
He was defrauded so not his decision.
And got defrauded.
Coerced people were forced through travel bans and job losses. They have a right to be mad.
The system implied "safe and effective" but hid a fraud perpetrated by politicians, public health and media that did not disclose the negative effects. When dealing with public health if fraud is committed it vitiates any protections. Those that were aware of the fraud but hid it are now accountable.
It's interesting that pfizer is trying to get a court case thrown out based on the fact that the government were fully aware of the issues with the vaccines and flaws in the studies but did not understand that there were risks so the fraud was on the public health departments and not with pfizer. Let's see how that plays out.
Except for the mandates for travel that seems logical, but if you are an owner operator who must travel to deliver goods essentially those mandates change your standard of living. Any government emposed mandate is irrevocable coercion and can be considered undo duress. The supreme court many choose to go the right way once the fraud of the jabs is fully exposed especially if the government agencies were aware whitch pfizer has indicated in court is the case.
No. People who are paid lots and lots of money to help him protect his health did lie to him in order to convince him to get it.
I didn't get the vaxx, so I won't be seeking any retribution. But I'm smart enough to know that these medical personnel deserve whatever revenge their victims may visit upon them
this is going to start happening around the world more and more when the rug pull happens more
What a great way to make one's self-selected suicide by vaccine count for SOMETHING.
A few "Kamikaze vaxxers" should be enough to teach the Regime henchmen to think twice about 'just following the science '...
"no one forced you to get it!!"
lol good one
Your not even an adult.
Your a child.look squirrel
did you miss the part about him being italian? the mandates in italy were about the worst in europe. he very likely had little to no choice.
You're a pretty big douchebag, huh? Single, fat, dropout, no reading comprehension? I hit it right on the head, didn't I? I wouldn't get too cocky, there, skidmark, this may happen to YOU one day. Smooches!
Not condoning violence, but let's continue the analogy.
If the dealer was given fake credibility, touted as a hero in the press, had the backing of all major institutions, had a medical degree...
And told them the shot was B12, but it was actually laced with heroin, intentionally given to get them addicted, then whatever they decide to do to the dealer is fine.
Drug dealers in white coats pushing death jabs.
The doctors have an oath to do no harm. It's on them if they turn a blind eye. They have insurance against malpractice but that does not protect them from negligence.
Nobody coerced them into accepting the lies when enough of their associates raised an issue they were fully aware of the doctors being sanctioned for questioning the narrative and choosing to defer their obligations to an unaccountable bureaucratic system like public health.
Why are you comparing a perfectly safe opiate with whatever the fuck this shit shot is? If you look it up, and feel free to have mum help you with the Brittanica, you'll find that the amount of people who die of a simple heroin OD (prior to fent, so don't even try it) is really really low. That's because it's.. SAFE!! Start adding alcohol or coke or benzos, or whatever you fancy, and the danger increases exponentially. I mean, how come stupid-assed ME shot heroin for almost a decade and never even had so much as a close call? I'll tell you. I was CAREFUL always tasting it first and never doing too much. Also, as I said, it's generally safe. Do you really believe some douchebag is getting a kilo of fent in the mail from China and mixing it with whatever on their kitchen table? Seriously? How about this one! Do you believe China actually BANNED the manufacture of fentanyl? 😆🤣😆(That's what gives the whole China element away as bullshit.) Its being made stateside for basically NO MONEY and mixed haphazardly and killing tons and tons of people. Money AND lots of death for their little faggot goat god. Win win.
What's more, yes, probably one SHOULD beat up their heroin dealer if they are taking advantage, and let's just go on and be real. Where is the difference when they are no more than agents of the state anyways, right? How do you think said opiate gets into your country? Inside of the ass of some mule? You probably DO think that, don't you? So, short answer, yes. Probably. Long answer, not valid since you probably wouldn't understand anyway.