My only thought is that it would make it easier to photoshop to make viewers think something is one way when it's actually the other. Are they all gov controlled op?
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Not necessary. Conspiracy is a perfectly valid theory to explain some strange things that happens. If you have a little data on subject, conspiracy can't be thrown out, since non of theories to explain stuff is significantly better. So, if you have only low quality video of strange phenomena, it is absolutely normal to see conspiracy theories around it. As soon, as better data will be available, some theories would be disproved, others will stay valid. If conspiracy will be disproven, then phemomena is out f scope of conspiracy theorists. If conspiracy will be proven, it is not a theory anymore, so that phenomena will be out of scope of conspiracy theorists too.
That is why a lot of low quality materials circulating in conspiracy theorists circles. Because they are essential material conspiracy theorists have to work with.
Let's say, bigfoot theory. All we have is low quality photos and videos. If eventually, bigfoot will be captured and studied, there will be a lot of high quality photos and videos. Biology will get yet another species to put into atlasses and study them. But there will be no any conspiracy theory anymore.
Maybe those who conspire, do so to maintain control over the infrastructure required to mass distribute high quality information?
EV'IDENCE, noun [Latin evidentia, from video, to see.]...such a video requires a player (mainstream); which requires an energy infrastructure suggested and users; viewers; consumers consenting to it. Distribution of suggested information represents the controlled operation.
If you doubt this...question why high def porn is freely available?
for endless coom
Every "coom" ends the potential of a child being born.
abortion
Justification for self destruction by lust for those who consent to abort; human blood sacrifice and dysgenics for those who suggest abortion.
Use your common sense.
For example, if you have a quarter of a whole country worth 2.5M starving to death over 4 years, it's not a policy mistake.