Ah Lenny. He was on the edge, for his time, and he addressed societal censorship. He talked about how words themselves are just words - linguistic symbols of concepts - and yet mere use of the 'wrong' word was punishable. In other words, a word itself is not criminal - it's just sounds in the air - but it is what parts of society assign to the use of the word that is the problem.
Over the years, much of the details of his experiences have been censored, in particular the language he used. He used the f word but also the vernacular for urine, feces, bundles of sticks, and many slang terms we today read online all the time. But back in the 50s and early 60s such words were not acceptable. He WAS a blue comedian but unlike today's comics who speak that way to look edge, Lenny did it as comment about society. Just as some artists try to shock in order to make us look at things in a new light, Lenny might do things like say the f word for minutes with different inflections, just to refocus our minds.
Anyway, what black comedians say these days and get away with, Lenny said back then and they arrested him for it.
a word itself is not criminal - it's just sounds in the air
In-between perceivable sound (need) and suggestible words (want) operates choice. The response of choice to perceivable sound (resonance) represents natural law; the submission of choice to suggested choices (dissonance) represents contract law.
As for "just" in the air...consider breathing (aka Latin spiro; spirit)?
In sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...how could one perceive sound without being within and by the source of all perceivable sound?
mere use of the 'wrong' word was punishable
What if consenting to use suggested words represents PUNISH (afflict pain) MENT (mind) upon self within a system of perceivable sound? Doesn't what we call communication aka agreement versus disagreement over suggested information represent a self inflicted punishment; division; conflict of reason?
Why would the parasitic few suggest up vs downvote tools on their social media platforms other than fermenting division among the many? When was the last time you agreed or disagreed with breathing? Were thirst; hunger and need for shelter ever an issue of agreement (want) versus disagreement (not want) or always a responsibility (need)?
a) do you need to define what others are or are you tempted to suggest others what they are; while ignoring that they were before you could make suggestions about them?
b) how does off the cuff adaptation to whatever inspires represent "spam"?
c) what software tools did you see?
d) a teacher (guru) suggests information towards consenting students; I grow comprehension by adapting to perceivable inspiration; while resisting the temptation to consent to any suggested information.
To learn for self implies to teach self and vice versa. Others represent both perceivable inspiration and the temptation of suggested information. It's free will of choice shaping the consequences.
Ostensibly arrested for 'obscenity' laws, drugs, though the result was standard j degeneracy, which would be expected.
interesting bit about the catholic church as a government with franchises, and the vietnam war as part of that. he talks about DMT also, and how the war department took over DMT.
'if you're a child molester and you cop out to the priest, no one in the neighborhood will know about it, except the kids'
People get arrested for posting memes on Twitter. The difference is that now, it's not in the name of "decency" as it was then (whether you consider it an outdated sense or not). Now you get tarred and feathered, and even arrested for going against the narrative.
Ah Lenny. He was on the edge, for his time, and he addressed societal censorship. He talked about how words themselves are just words - linguistic symbols of concepts - and yet mere use of the 'wrong' word was punishable. In other words, a word itself is not criminal - it's just sounds in the air - but it is what parts of society assign to the use of the word that is the problem.
THAT'S what got him arrested? A more true statement could not be made.
Over the years, much of the details of his experiences have been censored, in particular the language he used. He used the f word but also the vernacular for urine, feces, bundles of sticks, and many slang terms we today read online all the time. But back in the 50s and early 60s such words were not acceptable. He WAS a blue comedian but unlike today's comics who speak that way to look edge, Lenny did it as comment about society. Just as some artists try to shock in order to make us look at things in a new light, Lenny might do things like say the f word for minutes with different inflections, just to refocus our minds.
Anyway, what black comedians say these days and get away with, Lenny said back then and they arrested him for it.
Thank you for elaborating.
In-between perceivable sound (need) and suggestible words (want) operates choice. The response of choice to perceivable sound (resonance) represents natural law; the submission of choice to suggested choices (dissonance) represents contract law.
As for "just" in the air...consider breathing (aka Latin spiro; spirit)?
I'm very tired of this bot. It parrots data it's learned and forms contextually meaningless posts. DAILY spam.
In sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...how could one perceive sound without being within and by the source of all perceivable sound?
What if consenting to use suggested words represents PUNISH (afflict pain) MENT (mind) upon self within a system of perceivable sound? Doesn't what we call communication aka agreement versus disagreement over suggested information represent a self inflicted punishment; division; conflict of reason?
Why would the parasitic few suggest up vs downvote tools on their social media platforms other than fermenting division among the many? When was the last time you agreed or disagreed with breathing? Were thirst; hunger and need for shelter ever an issue of agreement (want) versus disagreement (not want) or always a responsibility (need)?
You're schizophrenic, not a guru. Also, I see you're using software tools in this spamming.
a) do you need to define what others are or are you tempted to suggest others what they are; while ignoring that they were before you could make suggestions about them?
b) how does off the cuff adaptation to whatever inspires represent "spam"?
c) what software tools did you see?
d) a teacher (guru) suggests information towards consenting students; I grow comprehension by adapting to perceivable inspiration; while resisting the temptation to consent to any suggested information.
To learn for self implies to teach self and vice versa. Others represent both perceivable inspiration and the temptation of suggested information. It's free will of choice shaping the consequences.
Worst most pathetic bot ever
Ostensibly arrested for 'obscenity' laws, drugs, though the result was standard j degeneracy, which would be expected.
interesting bit about the catholic church as a government with franchises, and the vietnam war as part of that. he talks about DMT also, and how the war department took over DMT.
'if you're a child molester and you cop out to the priest, no one in the neighborhood will know about it, except the kids'
https://youtu.be/CjBpbCceQjg
another fun one
Let Me Explain Jewish and Goyish To You
Very few comedians today who would be willing to jeopardize their career to speak any truth, can only think of a few who might fit that bill.
People get arrested for posting memes on Twitter. The difference is that now, it's not in the name of "decency" as it was then (whether you consider it an outdated sense or not). Now you get tarred and feathered, and even arrested for going against the narrative.