These comments are interesting and I do not disagree. Its how it works. We have no rights, and if the cops want to pull you out of the car and beat you to death they can do that.
But for the "higher law end". How is it not hypocritical to say you can be stopped and questioned WITHOUT the Miranda for the express purpose of arresting and prosecuting you. But once they have enough info to arrest you must be read your rights??
trust me on this. while the initial contact might not have included miranda warnings, the prosecutor did not bring a case to court without a proper arrest with miranda rights being read to him at the time of arrest. i think ur conflating initial contact (no miranda warnings) and actual arrest/prosecution.
These comments are interesting and I do not disagree. Its how it works. We have no rights, and if the cops want to pull you out of the car and beat you to death they can do that. But for the "higher law end". How is it not hypocritical to say you can be stopped and questioned WITHOUT the Miranda for the express purpose of arresting and prosecuting you. But once they have enough info to arrest you must be read your rights??
trust me on this. while the initial contact might not have included miranda warnings, the prosecutor did not bring a case to court without a proper arrest with miranda rights being read to him at the time of arrest. i think ur conflating initial contact (no miranda warnings) and actual arrest/prosecution.