Love vs Hate; True vs False...both representing want vs not want conflicts; caused by consenting to the same suggested narratives. One doesn't destroy a suggested narrative by consenting to oppose it...that affirms; fuels and perpetuates it. Even worse...one doesn't oppose the ones suggesting the narrative; but those who chose the opposite side of consenting to it (want or not want).
It's both sides...pro-life vs pro-choice that fuel the suggested "abortion" narrative. Whatever side one chooses is irrelevant to the continuation of the suggested narrative; since only those suggesting it have the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict it (talmudic reasoning). And what represents the power of the few making suggestions? The consent to the suggested by the many; who ignore perceivable for it.
Google suggests information; users consent to want or not want the suggested information from Google; then Google suggests endless more definition; redefinition and contradiction of information to keep the conflict of reason (want vs not want) going among those who are willingly consent to fight each other of the suggested information by a 3rd party.
This is called "division by suggestion" for mass population control and so far the many answered with a collective "moo"; hence being ridiculed for it as VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.] aka cattle; goyim.
Love vs Hate; True vs False...both representing want vs not want conflicts; caused by consenting to the same suggested narratives. One doesn't destroy a suggested narrative by consenting to oppose it...that affirms; fuels and perpetuates it. Even worse...one doesn't oppose the ones suggesting the narrative; but those who chose the opposite side of consenting to it (want or not want).
It's both sides...pro-life vs pro-choice that fuel the suggested "abortion" narrative. Whatever side one chooses is irrelevant to the continuation of the suggested narrative; since only those suggesting it have the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict it (talmudic reasoning). And what represents the power of the few making suggestions? The consent to the suggested by the many; who ignore perceivable for it.
Google suggests information; users consent to want or not want the suggested information from Google; then Google suggests endless more definition; redefinition and contradiction of information to keep the conflict of reason (want vs not want) going among those who are willingly consent to fight each other of the suggested information by a 3rd party.
This is called "division by suggestion" for mass population control and so far the many answered with a collective "moo"; hence being ridiculed for it as VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.] aka cattle; goyim.