Etymology is an interesting thing, but it is a diversion.
The foundation for that diversion represents the suggested word over the perceivable sound; hence the few crafting the spell of the consenting many through suggestion of idolized meaning; which in return allows the few to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) any and all suggested meaning.
inane
INA'NE, adjective [Latin inanis, empty.] - "to express a void space". ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable) cannot express emptiness, since the differentiated ONE exists at the center of the whole ALL. Or in other words...to be able to express implies responding to impression....impression (perception) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss).
pointless for the English standard definitions of these words are clearly the intended ones.
a) perceivable sound represents impressing origin; most suggested words tempt one towards outcomes. Living within the process of dying implies resisting origin to grow life before reaching outcome.
b) INTEND', verb [Latin intendo; in and tendo, to stretch]...it's living that is being stretched within the process of dying aka from inception towards death. That stretch represents growth within loss aka self sustenance of form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
c) I utilize 1822 Websters (or older sources) to show the suggested revisionism upon words, while adding an expression through my comprehension of perceivable sound.
d) DEFINITE (within boundaries) -TION (through action). Form (choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow represents temporary reaction bound to ongoing action. Everything perceivable represents predefined inspiration for all perceiving it from within to sustain themselves by adaptation to it.
The issue with adaptation within balance (momentum of motion) is the center...choice; hence both need (adaptation to balance) and want (ignoring balance for suggesting choices) aka responsibility to sustain life (growth) and temptation luring towards death (loss)...both coexisting.
something you are born with
NATURE, noun - "born, produced". You are within nature aka one thing (living) within everything (dying) aka reactor (growth) within generator (loss). What ONE lacks within ALL represents the as of yet untapped potentiality (loss) offered towards each ones potential (growth). In other words...ONE represents a seed (comprehension) within the soil of ALL (perceivable).
The parasitic few use suggested information to tempt the many to understand (stand under) others; while ignoring to grow comprehension out of perceivable inspiration.
Second, fortis is the Latin word for force. You have no idea what velocity is.
Living represents the force of temporary resistance within the ongoing force of velocity (dying). Notice that you as the living cannot perceive your own inception and death; yet are still moving within it. What the many are tempted by the suggestions of the few is to ignore the ever changing moment aka the moment-um of motion. Enacting flow (inception towards death) causes momentum (balance) for responding form (life with choice).
F=ma. a=dx/dt V
All suggested math is based on 0 aka an affixed state to count from; which tempts those counting to ignore being the 1 (choice) within ALL (balance). Math tempts ONE to seek solutions to suggested problems; while ignoring that being moved from inception towards death represents the solution and that each ONE within represents the resistance to being solved aka transmuted back to base.
Consider form to flow (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) as ingredient ONEs (living) transmutation out of base ALL (dying)? How to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything)? With suggested creationism (implies out of nothing).
The parasitic few suggest the many to seek order out of chaos; which tempts them to ignore that they represent temporary chaos (living; growth) out of the ongoing natural order (dying; loss).
Instead of the suggested mathematical formulas; question flow (inception towards death) as the origin of form (life)? Look at the rhetoric used to obfuscate this like...HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]. Those represent us being animated (animal) form (human); which implies out of animating flow.
Another one...the suggested meaning "insane person" tempts one to ignore the perceived implication of "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and therefore in response to the perceivable source of sound; which implies the responding choice of resonance (need) and dissonance (want).
velocity representing death is stupid
a) STUPID, adjective - "to stop". The temporary (living) cannot stop within the ongoing (dying); but suggesting to each other to be stupid breeds ignorance towards motion.
b) hold your breath and wait until the impressing force of velocity will caused your responding force of resistance. Once again...impression; compression; expression. Also...SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe.] aka form to flow adaptation.
Remember the sleight of hand by the parasitic few "I can't breathe" leads to death; followed by the suggestion "put a mask over your nose and mouth". This represents spiritual warfare by suggestion.
Fake edit: question being a reaction within an enacting system? The velocity you are measuring represents the mimicked reactions within the momentum of the ongoing action. Comprehending to be resistance within velocity; form within flow; potential within potentiality; choice within balance, magnetic within electric; temporary within ongoing; living within dying; growth within loss; ONE within ALL represents the growth of self discernment.
Afterwards ONE can start growing comprehension about the ONEness (energy) of ALL (loss/growth) or as the sleight of hand goes "one for all and all for one"
All suggested math is based on 0 aka an affixed state to count from; which tempts those counting to ignore being the 1 (choice) within ALL (balance). Math tempts ONE to seek solutions to suggested problems; while ignoring that being moved from inception towards death represents the solution and that each ONE within represents the resistance to being solved aka transmuted back to base.
Mistaken on all fronts.
Math was used by many archaic cultures which did NOT use a zero. It is based on knowledge of objects, one object plus another and so on... this does not require the idea of zero despite it following logically.
Differentials, such as the one I wrote, compare change, zero is not fundamental.
(Have fun with mostly Greek roots instead of Latin ones this time, I noticed you skipped 'etymology' and only mention the Latin root words...)
Within a balance based system...the suggested nothing represents 0 (ones ignorance of balance), while the perceivable everything represents 1 (one perceiving the oneness of all from within balance).
It is based on knowledge of objects, one object plus another and so on..
a) PLUS (Latin more) - "addition" tempts to ignore that the ones perceiving cannot add anything to all perceivable. Each ones growth is being transmuted out of all loss. That's once again suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
b) counting represents yet another deception since there's no such thing as a perceivable "two" within oneness (energy). All perceivable differentiation (into the perceiving ones) represents self differentiation of oneness into ones. Counting implies by choice; while suggesting counted as "two" represents tempting others to ignore perceivable differences for suggested sameness. The parasitic few utilize E Pluribus Unum (out of many one) to tempt the many into consenting to mix perceivable differences back together; hence corrupting perceivable inspiration needed for self sustenance.
Furthermore; NUM'BER; noun - "the designation of a unit" implies unitas - "the state of being one; oneness". Sleight of hand for counting: hook-nosed vampire in Sesame-Street: "I'm the Count; would you like to count with me?" We're being tempted by suggestion to count; to seek solutions; to solve problems; to pretend to add etc. Those who ignore the only ONE unit can be buried under suggested numbers.
c) form (living) represents the object within objectifying flow (dying). Ask yourself if the living within the process of dying need to count the breathes they take or if they need to adapt to being moved? Same for thirst and hunger...it's all about the balance of "enough"; not about counting sips and bites.
Math was used by many archaic cultures...based on knowledge of objects
You got anything on the oldest forms of MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath"?
Differentials, such as the one I wrote, compare change
Within a suggested confinement instead of from the perspective of ONE (perceiving) as the center of ALL (perceivable). The measured changes are (as far as I know) based on suggested sources of motion; which tempts to ignore that form represents the response to being moved; hence re-movement and the resulting struggle to sustain self within that.
a) if you suggest others to be "AI"; then you perpetuate dehumanization, hence pushing the transhumanism agenda of exchanging the 1 (perceivable inspiration) with 0 (suggested information).
b) I usually stick to Latin to Pig-Latin (English) when stripping aside ongoing revisionism. Greek to Latin hasn't inspired me that much; since the ignorance of the many is bound to English as the one world slave language, as suggested to them by the few, and also I already comprehend the perceptible sound as the foundation for every suggested word shaped out of it.
I'm always game to go over the rhetorical tricks within Latin; Greek; Norse; Sumerian etc. but so far reverse engineering deceptions (words) is less effective than growing comprehension by adapting to the perceptible origin (sound). If you have some ancient stuff to share; then by all means, express it.
c) what if nature sets "free will of choice" as the center of the operating system (balance); while other choices are suggesting programs (written information) to domesticate free will of choice by tempting it to consent to suggested information over perceivable inspiration?
The foundation for that diversion represents the suggested word over the perceivable sound; hence the few crafting the spell of the consenting many through suggestion of idolized meaning; which in return allows the few to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) any and all suggested meaning.
INA'NE, adjective [Latin inanis, empty.] - "to express a void space". ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable) cannot express emptiness, since the differentiated ONE exists at the center of the whole ALL. Or in other words...to be able to express implies responding to impression....impression (perception) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss).
a) perceivable sound represents impressing origin; most suggested words tempt one towards outcomes. Living within the process of dying implies resisting origin to grow life before reaching outcome.
b) INTEND', verb [Latin intendo; in and tendo, to stretch]...it's living that is being stretched within the process of dying aka from inception towards death. That stretch represents growth within loss aka self sustenance of form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
c) I utilize 1822 Websters (or older sources) to show the suggested revisionism upon words, while adding an expression through my comprehension of perceivable sound.
d) DEFINITE (within boundaries) -TION (through action). Form (choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow represents temporary reaction bound to ongoing action. Everything perceivable represents predefined inspiration for all perceiving it from within to sustain themselves by adaptation to it.
The issue with adaptation within balance (momentum of motion) is the center...choice; hence both need (adaptation to balance) and want (ignoring balance for suggesting choices) aka responsibility to sustain life (growth) and temptation luring towards death (loss)...both coexisting.
NATURE, noun - "born, produced". You are within nature aka one thing (living) within everything (dying) aka reactor (growth) within generator (loss). What ONE lacks within ALL represents the as of yet untapped potentiality (loss) offered towards each ones potential (growth). In other words...ONE represents a seed (comprehension) within the soil of ALL (perceivable).
The parasitic few use suggested information to tempt the many to understand (stand under) others; while ignoring to grow comprehension out of perceivable inspiration.
Living represents the force of temporary resistance within the ongoing force of velocity (dying). Notice that you as the living cannot perceive your own inception and death; yet are still moving within it. What the many are tempted by the suggestions of the few is to ignore the ever changing moment aka the moment-um of motion. Enacting flow (inception towards death) causes momentum (balance) for responding form (life with choice).
All suggested math is based on 0 aka an affixed state to count from; which tempts those counting to ignore being the 1 (choice) within ALL (balance). Math tempts ONE to seek solutions to suggested problems; while ignoring that being moved from inception towards death represents the solution and that each ONE within represents the resistance to being solved aka transmuted back to base.
Consider form to flow (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) as ingredient ONEs (living) transmutation out of base ALL (dying)? How to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything)? With suggested creationism (implies out of nothing).
The parasitic few suggest the many to seek order out of chaos; which tempts them to ignore that they represent temporary chaos (living; growth) out of the ongoing natural order (dying; loss).
Instead of the suggested mathematical formulas; question flow (inception towards death) as the origin of form (life)? Look at the rhetoric used to obfuscate this like...HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]. Those represent us being animated (animal) form (human); which implies out of animating flow.
Another one...the suggested meaning "insane person" tempts one to ignore the perceived implication of "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and therefore in response to the perceivable source of sound; which implies the responding choice of resonance (need) and dissonance (want).
a) STUPID, adjective - "to stop". The temporary (living) cannot stop within the ongoing (dying); but suggesting to each other to be stupid breeds ignorance towards motion.
b) hold your breath and wait until the impressing force of velocity will caused your responding force of resistance. Once again...impression; compression; expression. Also...SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe.] aka form to flow adaptation.
Remember the sleight of hand by the parasitic few "I can't breathe" leads to death; followed by the suggestion "put a mask over your nose and mouth". This represents spiritual warfare by suggestion.
Fake edit: question being a reaction within an enacting system? The velocity you are measuring represents the mimicked reactions within the momentum of the ongoing action. Comprehending to be resistance within velocity; form within flow; potential within potentiality; choice within balance, magnetic within electric; temporary within ongoing; living within dying; growth within loss; ONE within ALL represents the growth of self discernment.
Afterwards ONE can start growing comprehension about the ONEness (energy) of ALL (loss/growth) or as the sleight of hand goes "one for all and all for one"
Mistaken on all fronts.
Math was used by many archaic cultures which did NOT use a zero. It is based on knowledge of objects, one object plus another and so on... this does not require the idea of zero despite it following logically.
Differentials, such as the one I wrote, compare change, zero is not fundamental.
(Have fun with mostly Greek roots instead of Latin ones this time, I noticed you skipped 'etymology' and only mention the Latin root words...)
Within a balance based system...the suggested nothing represents 0 (ones ignorance of balance), while the perceivable everything represents 1 (one perceiving the oneness of all from within balance).
a) PLUS (Latin more) - "addition" tempts to ignore that the ones perceiving cannot add anything to all perceivable. Each ones growth is being transmuted out of all loss. That's once again suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
b) counting represents yet another deception since there's no such thing as a perceivable "two" within oneness (energy). All perceivable differentiation (into the perceiving ones) represents self differentiation of oneness into ones. Counting implies by choice; while suggesting counted as "two" represents tempting others to ignore perceivable differences for suggested sameness. The parasitic few utilize E Pluribus Unum (out of many one) to tempt the many into consenting to mix perceivable differences back together; hence corrupting perceivable inspiration needed for self sustenance.
Furthermore; NUM'BER; noun - "the designation of a unit" implies unitas - "the state of being one; oneness". Sleight of hand for counting: hook-nosed vampire in Sesame-Street: "I'm the Count; would you like to count with me?" We're being tempted by suggestion to count; to seek solutions; to solve problems; to pretend to add etc. Those who ignore the only ONE unit can be buried under suggested numbers.
c) form (living) represents the object within objectifying flow (dying). Ask yourself if the living within the process of dying need to count the breathes they take or if they need to adapt to being moved? Same for thirst and hunger...it's all about the balance of "enough"; not about counting sips and bites.
You got anything on the oldest forms of MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath"?
Within a suggested confinement instead of from the perspective of ONE (perceiving) as the center of ALL (perceivable). The measured changes are (as far as I know) based on suggested sources of motion; which tempts to ignore that form represents the response to being moved; hence re-movement and the resulting struggle to sustain self within that.
Ah, so i kin your programming can only aithnich Latin phonemes....
a) if you suggest others to be "AI"; then you perpetuate dehumanization, hence pushing the transhumanism agenda of exchanging the 1 (perceivable inspiration) with 0 (suggested information).
b) I usually stick to Latin to Pig-Latin (English) when stripping aside ongoing revisionism. Greek to Latin hasn't inspired me that much; since the ignorance of the many is bound to English as the one world slave language, as suggested to them by the few, and also I already comprehend the perceptible sound as the foundation for every suggested word shaped out of it.
I'm always game to go over the rhetorical tricks within Latin; Greek; Norse; Sumerian etc. but so far reverse engineering deceptions (words) is less effective than growing comprehension by adapting to the perceptible origin (sound). If you have some ancient stuff to share; then by all means, express it.
c) what if nature sets "free will of choice" as the center of the operating system (balance); while other choices are suggesting programs (written information) to domesticate free will of choice by tempting it to consent to suggested information over perceivable inspiration?