Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

23
posted 4 years ago by Toatl_Loesr 4 years ago by Toatl_Loesr +23 / -0
119 comments share
119 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (119)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– Allas8 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

So since 1+1=2 we live on a ball? Once you make observations, start assuming that the earth is flat, and all your observations will fit into the model, only problem comes with your understanding of the model.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– Esuomyonana 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Let me begin by saying I'm not a proponent of flat earth but I really dislike your arrogance on the matter.

Spamming flat earth is shill shit, but questioning the shape of the earth isn't.

I would like to show you how NASA determines eclipses.

The geocentric ephemeris for the Sun and Moon, various parameters, constants, and the Besselian elements (polynomial form) are given in the Table Elements of the Eclipse.

https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEmono/reference/explain.html

You mentioned math, how did you mathematically derive the shape of the Earth? Gravity? In a vacuum? Maybe you hung up a pendulum in a room to see if it would wobble.

I would like to propose an Idea to you.

Oh wait, do you have keplars equations? Do you know how to derive those?

Let's look into G real quick, the gravitational constant.

https://byjus.com/physics/gravitational-constant/

F = m1m2/r^2

You'd have to know the mass of the Earth so how is that derived?

Precise measurement of the Earth mass is difficult

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_mass

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– jack445566778899 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I’m pretty sure I’ve invited you before, but if not - please join us on the community I created to exchange views and discuss such things. Your approach, prespective, and experience would no doubt be of value if you wish to share it!

Please click my username and find the link, or let me know and I will pm it to you!

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy