I've watched them all before. If it was some cgi hoax the planes wouldn't appear on people's home videos or pictures which is not the case. Ever pair of eyes and cameras were pointed as those buildings. Literally thousands of people saw it happen. It's a completely retarded theory. It's hijacking the theory that a plane never hit the pentagon. The fact there is no video or pictures of a plane and almost no one directly saw a plane crash there, leaves a lot of room for speculation. That is not true of the twin towers.
on people's home videos or pictures which is not the case
I've never seen any of these home videos with planes in them. All of the ones I've seen have been looking somewhere else, then panned towards the towers after the explosion. The only ones that were pointing right at the towers at the time of impact were the news cameras.
The argument about the aircraft being made of aluminium, and how that shouldn't have penetrated the steel structured building seems a bit wonky: a moderately powered lead round being fired from your average assault rifle can go straight through an aluminium car, and lead is way softer than aluminium.
Well this only seems wonkey because this is apples to oranges comparison. All of a bullets force is concentrated into one point, its designed to do that. Also the aluminum it's piercing is very thin material.
A plane is not designed to impart all of its force on one specific point. The steel framework of the tower is more of a mesh design too. I think a more accurate comparison would be chainmail vs a sword, but in this case the sword isnt even a sword.
Decades ago, a group of Libyan terrorists blew up an airliner while it was in the air over Lockerbie (UK). Large pieces of that smashed into the ground, and through loads of houses, and still remained fairly intact.
Interesting, then, how they never found anything large in the rubble of 9-11.
Watch this and get back to me
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1rqxzJ2BEUoc/
Retarded bullshit. The planes appear in countless home videos took by random people. There were also thousands of people that saw it first hand.
So you ignored it, alright you have that choice. I just suggest to anyone reading this to actually watch the video and make up your own mind.
I've watched them all before. If it was some cgi hoax the planes wouldn't appear on people's home videos or pictures which is not the case. Ever pair of eyes and cameras were pointed as those buildings. Literally thousands of people saw it happen. It's a completely retarded theory. It's hijacking the theory that a plane never hit the pentagon. The fact there is no video or pictures of a plane and almost no one directly saw a plane crash there, leaves a lot of room for speculation. That is not true of the twin towers.
I've never seen any of these home videos with planes in them. All of the ones I've seen have been looking somewhere else, then panned towards the towers after the explosion. The only ones that were pointing right at the towers at the time of impact were the news cameras.
Well this only seems wonkey because this is apples to oranges comparison. All of a bullets force is concentrated into one point, its designed to do that. Also the aluminum it's piercing is very thin material.
A plane is not designed to impart all of its force on one specific point. The steel framework of the tower is more of a mesh design too. I think a more accurate comparison would be chainmail vs a sword, but in this case the sword isnt even a sword.
Interesting, then, how they never found anything large in the rubble of 9-11.