Capitalism in its western form have some restrictions. Some ways of making profit accounted as crime.
- Killing competitor is a crime.
- Theft is a crime.
- Patent infringement is a crime.
- Insider trading is a crime. And so on.
So, capitalism could have restrictions.
What if there could be another capitalism, with another, slightly different set of restrictions?
Say,
- Killing competitor is a crime.
- Theft is a crime.
- Usury is a crime.
- Profiteering (all that stock games) is a crime.
- Intentional limiting of customer in a bought product usage (all that "planned obsolescence", "usage licenses" and "authorized service only") is a crime. with keeping all other freedoms of private business you could find in western capitalism.
Will it still be a capitalism? Do capitalism you defend should have usury and profiteering as essential part of it?
Just asking for a friend who think that western type of capitalism is doomed and sooner or later will be completely demolished by insane elites. So we will have to build new type of capitalism, that have no vulnerabilites that allow creation and existence of elites. :)
What rules and restrictions such capitalism should have to avoid a core possibility of elite formation?
Take in mind, that under "elite" I mean parasitic bastards, like current ones, not a meritocratic elite, like best engineers or best business organizers.
a) PROF'IT, noun [Latin profectus, proficio, pro and facio) - "to proceed forward, to advance"...For the living that implies proceeding forwards; advancing towards dying.
b) want (law) versus not want (crime) represents the ignorance of need (justice) aka that which "just is"; hence the living needing to resist that which just is...dying. Not seeking to move forwards (for suggested profits); but growing resistance (living) while being moved (dying).
c) choice (evaluation) within balance (value) of motion (liquidity).
a) from French élite "selection, choice"...aka the choice of ignorance among the many (host); exploited by the few (parasite) who suggest choices for the many to consent to.
b) if each one of the many ignores to utilize free will of choice; then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the "elite". Why? Because choice represents the responding center of an enacting; balance based system; and so if the many willingly choose imbalance; then the few gain all the ignored power.
c) current ones aka the ones (life) within all current (inception towards death) aka temporary form within ongoing flow.
Willingly consenting to a suggested -ism by the will of others; represents ignorance of ones capital aka free will of choice. Only the few who suggest the -isms hold the sole will to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning thereof for all the consenting many reasoning (want vs not want) against each other over it.
Instead of reasoning about what is or isn't capitalism...regain control over your capital (perceiving choice within perceivable balance); while resisting suggested capitalism under the will of others.