a) adaptation to perceived inspiration represents vision; consenting to suggested information represents others "tell a vision"
b) among other ones, one is tempted to ignore all perceivable needed for wanted suggestions by others.
c) suggestion (want or not want) aims at choice to ignore being the center of perceivable balance (need/want).
d) ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) causes an imbalance (want vs not want) among all those who ignore being within balance (need/want). This conflict is called reason.
e) choice needs to respond to perceivable balance (need/want); while resisting the temptation of suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by other choices.
f) to consent to any suggestion represents a choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka the inversion of perceivable balance (action) to choice (reaction) natural law.
g) the parasitic few industrialized the use of contract law among the ignorant many as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew". Hence; balance to choice (original bond) and choice to choice (being bound anew).
In short...the foundation of a tell-a-vision represents the exploitation of the many consenting to what the few are suggesting; which in return allows the few to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of everything suggested for the many.
a) adaptation to perceived inspiration represents vision; consenting to suggested information represents others "tell a vision"
b) among other ones, one is tempted to ignore all perceivable needed for wanted suggestions by others.
c) suggestion (want or not want) aims at choice to ignore being the center of perceivable balance (need/want).
d) ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) causes an imbalance (want vs not want) among all those who ignore being within balance (need/want). This conflict is called reason.
e) choice needs to respond to perceivable balance (need/want); while resisting the temptation of suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by other choices.
f) to consent to any suggestion represents a choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka the inversion of perceivable balance (action) to choice (reaction) natural law.
g) the parasitic few industrialized the use of contract law among the ignorant many as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew". Hence; balance to choice (original bond) and choice to choice (being bound anew).
In short...the foundation of a tell-a-vision represents the exploitation of the many consenting to what the few are suggesting; which in return allows the few to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of everything suggested for the many.