Try implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false; want vs not want; believing vs not believing etc.) and take a shot at anything I wrote and I'm gonna try to describe any and all of the processes I comprehend of the perceivable.

Question impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss)? The more one comprehends about the perceivable consequences of ongoing motion; the more efficient one can describe it and more importantly express it.

The issue with describing the perceivable through suggestion represents tempting others to ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information); which represents what the parasitic few are exploiting the ignorant many with.

Example...before the suggested word comes the perceivable sound. The parasitic few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and therefore in response to the perceivable source of sound. I can meticulously describe all this stuff; but comprehension of perceivable has to be grown by each one; it cannot be shared through suggested information; hence the issue with communication.

As for semantics...the highest value within all existence represents evaluation; hence being evaluation (choice) at the center of value (balance). One cannot define meaning by suggestion; all perceivable represents predefined enacted meaning for the reacting evaluation within.