Wow. You didn't even TRY to answer any of my questions.
If you want to know why, I used to moderate a group that was for atheist vs religious discussion. I have heard it all before. I still haven't heard an argument that makes sense. You talk about my beliefs needing faith. No, they don't need anything because it's a lack of belief in someone else's story. That is all.
I also accept that it's not possible to know some things; I just choose not to insert a deity to try to explain it. I'm perfectly comfortable not knowing.
I no longer moderate that group and I did learn one thing from it and that was I do have a respect for religion and appreciate the value it can bring people. I just don't buy into the story that goes with it. I'd probably be religious myself if I didn't have to pretend I believed absurd things just to be in the club.
The number of times you've heard an argument is IRRELEVANT to its truth value. You've done nothing but regurgitate layman-tier armchair atheist rhetoric. The idea that you can derive logic and reasoning from chaos and the fact that you moderated an atheist vs religion group but don't understand that science is based on philosophical axioms that cannot be proven by evidence based means doesn't make any sense. You're making self refuting arguments and it doesn't bother you. That means you've got faith in the scientific method. Moreover, you should know that an appeal to absurdity is logically fallacious and shouldn't be the basis of your belief system. I hope you open your eyes while you still can, fren.
If you want to know why, I used to moderate a group that was for atheist vs religious discussion. I have heard it all before. I still haven't heard an argument that makes sense. You talk about my beliefs needing faith. No, they don't need anything because it's a lack of belief in someone else's story. That is all.
I also accept that it's not possible to know some things; I just choose not to insert a deity to try to explain it. I'm perfectly comfortable not knowing.
I no longer moderate that group and I did learn one thing from it and that was I do have a respect for religion and appreciate the value it can bring people. I just don't buy into the story that goes with it. I'd probably be religious myself if I didn't have to pretend I believed absurd things just to be in the club.
The number of times you've heard an argument is IRRELEVANT to its truth value. You've done nothing but regurgitate layman-tier armchair atheist rhetoric. The idea that you can derive logic and reasoning from chaos and the fact that you moderated an atheist vs religion group but don't understand that science is based on philosophical axioms that cannot be proven by evidence based means doesn't make any sense. You're making self refuting arguments and it doesn't bother you. That means you've got faith in the scientific method. Moreover, you should know that an appeal to absurdity is logically fallacious and shouldn't be the basis of your belief system. I hope you open your eyes while you still can, fren.