I view population control as being pushed by the sexually abnormal trying to get rid of the people who don't want them around, and by the rich who want to own everything without the complication of other people, like those despicables, being around.
You look at Klaus Schwab and you just know he's not straight. You look at the black lesbian Marxists who hate the white male, and you instinctively know one of their goals is to kill off males. So you have normal-hating gays, man-hating lesbians, and no wonder they push abortion; these are not people who deeply love children. But some of them certainly want to have children around to abuse. So it's a mixed bag. And the Satanists probably love the idea of having slaves and people to sacrifice.
That's what we're up against. The Left has so much hate and filth in them.
But it doesn't population control. It just makes faggots. Look at Africa. Queerest populations on the planet. But the fastest growing.
Faggots are the result of consumption, not depopulation. They're the result of population, not depopulation. When a population gets larger, it gets queerer. Simple fact with mammals. The greater their numbers the more they fuck everything until they get fucked. Literally nature answers back.
Perhaps they're used as another mechanism of dystopia. But consumption is the result of faggots. They spend far more, unless they're Africans.
Laws, causing dystopia, a narrative selling services for a global authority. If everybody is buying faggots, what else are they buying. See how that works. No sooner is the global authority telling everybody what to do, making laws and regulations for them. Because it is selling them the buggery of it pays them more. Simple stuff like Netflix is now the Global medium and dominating narrative. How much money has it made its brokers. Rape. They force the rape. Seriously motivate the liberals demanding the rights to control the profit. Next there's the Ukraine or something.
Control for profit. They're a product of population, not depopulation.
Netflix gets taxes, you pay your fee and it has gotten a bunch of free taxation. Sure it pays something tax on its Corp. But it declares that show a loss for tax exemption, and it gets tax breaks and tax subsidies on arts and farts, local productions. But any propaganda has gone and triggered the liberals. Next Iran is protesting the rights. It better or else there will be the sanctions. All so Netflix can get a tax break, no, profit. Then the global authority can tell Iran what to do. Selling it a bunch of American God's.
No? Are you sure.
Today they're triggering the wokism because it runs off to the Ukraine. Or somewhere.
Nature, same problem. Lack of herd too much herd, hormones, pheromones. Seasonal what happens. Rutting season stag claims entire harem. What do the losers do, get bent? No what. Sometimes, it's simple dominance. But by nature they're BI, same with all mammals.
Sex is an appetite and preferences. Product of environment and experience. Bigger population more choices. In the wild. The dominant claim the herd.
You're talking about conditioning. A simple narrative of control in order to profit off more services by passing laws and regulations to sell stuff. Integration. Lack of rights provoke the liberals into forcing change often for control.
Today they're forcing change to cause control. Perhaps it's depopulation, but it was because of population, it provided more choices. Not because of depopulation. Depopulation is a run off facing every large population. It will tip through nature, human, conflict, or geography, threatening a habitat by consuming it.
No they're the product of consumption. The cause of population. Not depopulation. Another service buggering your damn ass, costing you more. Choice. Sex is an appetite. Not reproduction. They also add dystopia. They suddenly need a million laws and rights. Policing you into more taxes.
Simple experiment with mammals. Mice is easiest. Add more numbers than the cage can sustain. 4 but add 8. The mice become queer, and even cannibal, but their numbers grow. Grow until they die of disease or starvation.
Not really. They layer some dystopia controlling the increased population having more services and choices. Eventually renaissance becomes catastrophe. It did with Sodom and Gamorrah, Pompeii, the Mayans, and so many more. But this is from a growing population expanding, and the technology surpassing it, depleting resources quicker, causing a host of geography and geopolitics.
But technically they're not depopulation, they're a result of increased population. Population eventually tips whatever its sexual appetite. The more it grows the greater its problems. Nature eventually answers back, human, conflict is our nature, we are individuals who make our own choices, or planetary, the greater a species numbers the more they threaten the natural habitat. Increased sexual appetites can bring diseases. A case whatever your fetish. But conceptually you're wrong to assume depopulation. Opposite by fact, a result of population.
An easy assumption because they cannot birth, without more services, adoption, surrogacy, whatever. Why did they need too, when there was that increased population having more choice promoting them? Too control it. Yawn. It would gain no matter what gets fucked. Until it tips, no matter what.
Not promoting them, don't care, dispelling that myth. A result of increased population. Otherwise simple fact, they wouldn't sustain. Imagine it in the Wild. There's Ham sent into the Jungle.
I view population control as being pushed by the sexually abnormal trying to get rid of the people who don't want them around, and by the rich who want to own everything without the complication of other people, like those despicables, being around.
You look at Klaus Schwab and you just know he's not straight. You look at the black lesbian Marxists who hate the white male, and you instinctively know one of their goals is to kill off males. So you have normal-hating gays, man-hating lesbians, and no wonder they push abortion; these are not people who deeply love children. But some of them certainly want to have children around to abuse. So it's a mixed bag. And the Satanists probably love the idea of having slaves and people to sacrifice.
That's what we're up against. The Left has so much hate and filth in them.
But it doesn't population control. It just makes faggots. Look at Africa. Queerest populations on the planet. But the fastest growing.
Faggots are the result of consumption, not depopulation. They're the result of population, not depopulation. When a population gets larger, it gets queerer. Simple fact with mammals. The greater their numbers the more they fuck everything until they get fucked. Literally nature answers back.
Perhaps they're used as another mechanism of dystopia. But consumption is the result of faggots. They spend far more, unless they're Africans.
Laws, causing dystopia, a narrative selling services for a global authority. If everybody is buying faggots, what else are they buying. See how that works. No sooner is the global authority telling everybody what to do, making laws and regulations for them. Because it is selling them the buggery of it pays them more. Simple stuff like Netflix is now the Global medium and dominating narrative. How much money has it made its brokers. Rape. They force the rape. Seriously motivate the liberals demanding the rights to control the profit. Next there's the Ukraine or something.
Control for profit. They're a product of population, not depopulation.
No, but seriously? Lol
Netflix gets taxes, you pay your fee and it has gotten a bunch of free taxation. Sure it pays something tax on its Corp. But it declares that show a loss for tax exemption, and it gets tax breaks and tax subsidies on arts and farts, local productions. But any propaganda has gone and triggered the liberals. Next Iran is protesting the rights. It better or else there will be the sanctions. All so Netflix can get a tax break, no, profit. Then the global authority can tell Iran what to do. Selling it a bunch of American God's.
No? Are you sure.
Today they're triggering the wokism because it runs off to the Ukraine. Or somewhere.
No? Are you sure.
Nature, same problem. Lack of herd too much herd, hormones, pheromones. Seasonal what happens. Rutting season stag claims entire harem. What do the losers do, get bent? No what. Sometimes, it's simple dominance. But by nature they're BI, same with all mammals.
Sex is an appetite and preferences. Product of environment and experience. Bigger population more choices. In the wild. The dominant claim the herd.
You're talking about conditioning. A simple narrative of control in order to profit off more services by passing laws and regulations to sell stuff. Integration. Lack of rights provoke the liberals into forcing change often for control.
Today they're forcing change to cause control. Perhaps it's depopulation, but it was because of population, it provided more choices. Not because of depopulation. Depopulation is a run off facing every large population. It will tip through nature, human, conflict, or geography, threatening a habitat by consuming it.
promotion of people who can’t populate is population control. does not get more simple than that.
No they're the product of consumption. The cause of population. Not depopulation. Another service buggering your damn ass, costing you more. Choice. Sex is an appetite. Not reproduction. They also add dystopia. They suddenly need a million laws and rights. Policing you into more taxes.
Simple experiment with mammals. Mice is easiest. Add more numbers than the cage can sustain. 4 but add 8. The mice become queer, and even cannibal, but their numbers grow. Grow until they die of disease or starvation.
you just explained population control LOL
Not really. They layer some dystopia controlling the increased population having more services and choices. Eventually renaissance becomes catastrophe. It did with Sodom and Gamorrah, Pompeii, the Mayans, and so many more. But this is from a growing population expanding, and the technology surpassing it, depleting resources quicker, causing a host of geography and geopolitics.
But technically they're not depopulation, they're a result of increased population. Population eventually tips whatever its sexual appetite. The more it grows the greater its problems. Nature eventually answers back, human, conflict is our nature, we are individuals who make our own choices, or planetary, the greater a species numbers the more they threaten the natural habitat. Increased sexual appetites can bring diseases. A case whatever your fetish. But conceptually you're wrong to assume depopulation. Opposite by fact, a result of population.
An easy assumption because they cannot birth, without more services, adoption, surrogacy, whatever. Why did they need too, when there was that increased population having more choice promoting them? Too control it. Yawn. It would gain no matter what gets fucked. Until it tips, no matter what.
Not promoting them, don't care, dispelling that myth. A result of increased population. Otherwise simple fact, they wouldn't sustain. Imagine it in the Wild. There's Ham sent into the Jungle.