Shortly after the incident, the automaker agreed to cover 50 percent of the repair costs since the car was out of its warranty period, but under one condition: that the owner keep quiet and not invoke any legal proceedings against the company, and not hold Tesla responsible for "any and all claims or damages arising out of or in any way connected with any claims or incidents leading or related to our provision of Goodwill [partially paying for the repairs]," according to a document obtained by Daily Kanban.
So a single person, and they are claiming that it's a Non Disclosure Agreement, when clearly he talked about it?
Was I to only read the title and give it up votes based on that alone? Further more, do you know the difference between Elon Musk and the corporation known as Tesla and it's lawyers? Because they are different entities. Oh, sorry. It would seem that, again, I am not going along with the narrative you baked into your title.
So a single person, and they are claiming that it's a Non Disclosure Agreement, when clearly he talked about it?
Was I to only read the title and give it up votes based on that alone? Further more, do you know the difference between Elon Musk and the corporation known as Tesla and it's lawyers? Because they are different entities. Oh, sorry. It would seem that, again, I am not going along with the narrative you baked into your title.
My bad.
Elon wants to take the company private. That means it's his.
free speech != no NDAs