Was banned for disagreeing with mods.
This sub is not a free speech sub (not site, meant sub).
They'll ban this account in minutes, because they're fucking facists that censor way more than any dipshit reddit mod.
If you keep censorsing me, I'll just continue to make new accounts and post. I don't care about upvotes.
This platform is too full of morons, shills, and bots to care about votes or use it as an actual reflection of peer sentiment.
Anyone else face similarly selective bans from these cunt mods?
Lol all the shills shilling about the shills. Seriously stop legislate the adoption of your views and instead offer persuasive arguments. There are a few leftist posters who do a good job of pointing out the hypocrisy and uniparty corruption, etc.
First of all, I'm not a leftist, you presumptuous buffoon. I don't think you could pin me down on a political spectrum and frankly think the device is a ridiculous control mechanism used for divide and conquer.
Secondly, I am not "legislating" the adoption of my views to anyone. How would that even be possible? How can one "legislate" their views to others on an open internet forum?
Thirdly, all I've done is offer rational, persuasive, logic based arguments. It's difficult to do this when you're banned for questioning the moderators views or pet conspiracy quotes.
People respond with insults and shill accusations rather than address what are often nuanced, highly specific arguments. Which I find suspect. That feels like exactly what a shill would do. If those insults and accusations are enough to be banned, then this should be universally applied and not just at the retarded whims of a small dicked admin.
You can't claim to stand for free speech and ban people who make you mad. It's pathetic. It's also frivolous, since I can continue to make new accounts. It just makes the mods look like free speech hypocrites.
Just using leftists as an example given the context in the post about it being a conservative echo chamber.... Here's some unsolicited advice: if you don't want people to engage in personal attacks, perhaps try leading by example.
I don't give a shit if people use personal attacks. Especially when they come off as a dumb cunt like you. Those attacks have to make sense to actually hit, and so far, there's only been one insult lobbed at me here that I actually deserved.
I wouldn't advocate those people be banned either. You either.
Who gives a flying fuck.
All true. It's fun to be a dick to people who are transparently stupid and cannot reason for themselves.
I could use better choice of words, but that would be less fun. And I enjoy contentious debate, but mostly when it's someone intelligent and not some illogical dipshit who acts like a shill.
Why would I use an offensive retort here? What you said was not offensive.
You made a quality and meaningful observation that required time, effort, and thinking.
You delivered your point cohesively and without deceptive or stupid logic.
You get more points from me than 99% of the morons here.
You sound like a liberal on twitter defending corporate censorship.
You people are no different. You cannot handle rational criticism without devolving into the exact people you claim to hate.
Keep defending censorship.
Actually, it's hypocrisy that enrages me. It would be foolish to view upvotes or downvotes here as an actual reflection of peer sentiment. The rules of the platform allow for too much botting, shilling, and targeted harassment from users using multiple accounts. The votes might as well be meaningless. I'm here for discussion and to get people's takes on different arguments and ideas.
Seeing small dicked admins beat their chest over free speech and rights, only to engage in personal-vendetta style censorship when it suits them, is distasteful, to say the least.
I posted skepticism about claims that school shootings were "hoaxed". I don't rule out conspiracies, but claims about fake victims and hoaxes don't make any logical sense to me whatsoever, and I think can be ruled out with simple thought experiments. I'm talking about "fake town", "fake school", "fake children" bs. That doesn't rule out other "lean" mkultra style conspiracies.
I think that's a valid and neutral opinion.
I also addressed misinformation regarding a JFK quote. Although, in all fairness, I did get something wrong myself that I want to address in a new post. I know I directly, and somewhat aggressively disagreed with a mod on that one. But in all fairness, they are COMPLETELY wrong and it's easy to prove it with the full speech audio.
Other than that, I like to engage in aggressive debate, and like posting nuanced takes. I don't mind people using insults and won't hesitate to use them myself. That doesn't seem to be unique around here.
I lurked for several months before posting. So far I've made 3 accounts. The first was HardTruths420. I honestly forget what the second was because they banned me after just one post (granted, I was calling the mod compromised).
But hey, in my view, their behavior seems highly suspect.
Pkvi! You’re back!
Sounds like you're trying to cover for one of the mods on this sub, who 100% issued a ban.
They might not remove the posts, but there's a reason they banned me. Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered.
Probably so they can continue to use their alts to pump shill accusations anytime I attack their pet theories.
"Look at that handshake shill".
No idea what you are posting nor the type of belief set you possess. I like to think they ban all the crazy leftist zealots that repeat stupid shit from the mainstream here, this site is better than that it seems.
So far I have been able to read* a decent variety of content and I am pretty pleased with the site overall.
I'm pretty sure you're a fucking fed, actually.
I know what you're up to you fucking loser.
That's what I thought, too. One of the mods is either comp'd or just a mealy-mouthed loser who pretends to stand for free speech until someone insults and disagrees with them.
Just another shitty group of abusive mods. I honestly am so disappointed.
They didn't provide an explanation either. Probably something to do with their small dicks, if I had to wager.
The site is free speech, you won't get banned by the admins unless you do something illegal. Individual subs are not necessarily free speech and they can ban you there. How do you think I'm able to run subs like c/furryart, c/nekomimi, c/atheist, and so on?
I got banned from the pussies at The Donald because they couldn't handle or counter my pro-abortion stance. Got banned from consumeproduct because I'm not racist.
Pro-Life vs Pro-Choice...doesn't that ignore that Life equals Choice?
What are you talking about?
Might be a bot. Look at the name and what they quoted, and the response ignores context for the most part, beyond a potential keyword-based trigger.
And FYI, I know plenty of conservatives who are pro-choice. I myself don't really have a position on it.
I see the merits in both sides arguments and think it comes down to people valuing different things and having different morals. Nothing wrong with that.
It's an irreconcilable difference in morals that cannot be remedied with any amount of debate--it's used by the elites as a social wedge issue to manipulate and distract the public.
You might be right. His response makes even less sense.
Those who suggest "abortion" are tempting those who are "alive" to "choose" between Pro-life vs Pro-choice; while both sides ignore that Life equals Choice.
This is called a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see.
Before that...
a) to consent to a suggestion represents the choice to want or not want it.
b) those who make the suggestion can after getting the consent rebrand the resulting conflict (want vs not want) into for example pro-life (want) vs pro-choice (not want).
c) these conflicts are called "reason"; which side one chooses within is irrelevant to a conflict defined by suggestions from outside, and only those making the suggestions can define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning that all the others are reasoning over.
d) so far the conflict of reason between pro-life vs pro-choice sustained over half a century of "abortion"...a mass sacrifice ritual among the consenting many as suggested by the few.
Well, my ban is proof that this is not true. At least from my perspective.
You did something illegal then. I've seen people straight up insult u/c and nothing happens to them.
I assume you still don't know the difference between mods and admins, nor the difference between a sub ban and site ban. If you were site banned by admins it's only because you did something illegal or otherwise broke the very simple and reasonable ToS. Provide proof if this is not the case. You haven't even linked us to your supposed site banned account.
Yeah, I definitely didn't do anything illegal. That's complete and total bs.
And I already told you the account name. HardTruths420.
Pretty sure it was one the mods here that issued the ban, too. Because as soon as I posted about them banning my account from a newly created alt (with a similar name... I think HardTruths423) I was banned within 5 minutes.
That's quite a coincidence. Especially since there's obviously no way that one post was illegal. Totally ridiculous. It's obviously an abusive mod.
https://scored.co/u/HardTruths420
That account is not site banned, what the fuck are you talking about?
Not only are you fucking retarded, you're a liar too.
"you won't get banned by the admins unless you do something illegal. Individual subs are not necessarily free speech and they can ban you there"
Can't you fucking read?
You said "This is not a free speech site" implying you got banned from the site, rather than an individual sub. Otherwise you would have said "This is not a free speech sub/board." You are retarded.
I don't know why you got banned. Send a mod mail to this sub and ask. Crying about it here like this will probably just get this account banned from the sub too.
Misunderstanding. I meant to say sub not site. The error is mine, but the general point still stands.
"I got banned from your shit website, and you're all idiots. But I'm going to keep creating new accounts"
And I will continue to tell you all when you're being naïve imbeciles and spreading disprovable nonsense.
You cannot stop me or censor me.
But yeah, keep defending censorship you fucking loser. I'm here for the 1% of actually intelligent users who want to engage in productive debate and discussion.
10$ says Zap is a fed.
Don't pretend to stand for free speech if you don't. You people are no different than the fat loser mods at reddit, apparently.
Scared of rational debate and critical thinking. Very big brain of you.
I can continue to make new accounts and post here.
You literally cannot censor me here, and just look like a hypocrite for even trying.
You can build a better platform to prevent this, if you can't handle it.
OP is confusing sub mods with site admins. Admins have explicitly stated anything is allowed as long as it's not illegal. Unlike Reddit you can make your own sub that goes against the narrative and the admins won't ban you. For example, my sub c/furryart which goes against the conservative narrative of this site.
Not all mods are good mods. Just how it goes. I'm thankful we have good admins, unlike Reddit.
Possibly. But I don't know who issued the ban and think it's fair to assume it was a mod I was aggressively disagreeing with and ridiculing.