Flat-Outrageous-(Flat-Earth)
(odysee.com)
Comments (30)
sorted by:
A compilation of Flat Earth Stories! -(Flat Outrageous)
https://odysee.com/@RichardLopez:3/Flat-Outrageous-(Flat-Earth):d
and why it matters https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Why-Flat-Earth-Matters:8
Thanks for sharing!
To all with an interest in the subject, please join us on the community i created to explore/exchange view on it!
Click my username and find the link, or let me know and I will pm it to you!
I find the idea interesting, but I am skeptical when there is only one main source of information. Too many people seem to just say 'go to Eric dubay'...is he really the only one who can do this? Or perhaps is that some marketing of his own?
--
I am a map skeptic, not yet sure on the shape either, but to claim it must be flat because a book says it which has been translated a bunch of times, vs a bunch of scientists who learned to repeat math equations designed by a few key people through history. Both are just as likely to have issues.
Gravity while necessary for the globe models and physics we have, doesn't disappear with a flag world...things still rise and fall none the less in both.
The act of flying off is interesting except from the scale and relative nature of the atmosphere and electromagnetics that must also be accounted for if you are to look at the globe model - not just gravity.
Again ... Gravity is still the linchpin it seems in a lot of these arguments and since no one can explain it.....even if they say 'density bro'....like what does that even mean.... Can you please define the so called physical laws that you are then replacing everything with using your density and give some equations for use that replace the gravity equations? Why does density then only seem to make things go up and down...why not side to side....
It's the one area of contention I have with the globe skeptics.
david weiss is who i really like to listen to ... there are plenty of sources if you look https://www.theflatearthpodcast.com/
and gravity, is 'gravity theory' never been proven ... if it holds TONS of water to the earth, how can birds and bugs fly?
take a blown up beach ball underwater ... it floats right back up ... helium balloons float pretty easy too ... so much for gravity imo
Tbf. Water is partially diamagnetic, so if the core is theoretically iron and magnetically charged due to the sun's rays and the rotation etc, it could be partially contained by the magnetics
lol, ok ... david weiss will give you 3 bitcoin if you can show ONE real proof of the globe, go pass that crap by him https://www.theflatearthpodcast.com/must-see-videos/
water always lays flat, always ... not sideways, not upside down
and here's another i suppose you can explain ... seriously, you can see a sun that's 93 MILLION miles away? lol ... ok. you really believe this bs??? really?
its crazy that flat earth is 'retarded' but all the nonsense they spew is truth? clown world to the max
they are evil deceiving liars https://odysee.com/@Godsflatearth:a/nasa-666-satan:7
they laugh that they can get people to believe such nonsense.
oh and did you know ... GLOBES ARE NOT MEANT FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES!!! https://odysee.com/@TheFlatEarthAwakening:0/globes-are-not-meant-for-educational:8
"believe' the globe if you want, believing is the enemy of knowing ... ego is the protector of belief
It holds the birds and bugs down too. Those things have low mass and wings that provide lift in air. None of this is controversial.
fight fight fight to protect their lies
Agreed.
Of course not!
Agreed! Abject appeal to authority is not a good way to learn or know anything!
True. That’s the law of gravity. It exists regardless of the shape of the world, and has for thousands of years. I doubt seriously that it is going anywhere!
The issue/contention is only with gravitation, not gravity.
Not really. The globe posit precedes gravitation by about 2 millennia. The shape of the world does not depend on (nor derive from) gravitation (nor gravity) - it is just taught that way today.
If you’d like to know, I would be happy to explain! Please join me on the community I created to discuss such topics! Click my username and find the link, or let me know and I will PM it to you!
Fair enough! Let us discuss/exchange our perspectives and further explore them!
its shit like this that discredits the conspiracy community. my god....
It seems that way, but looks can be deceiving. Care to earnestly discuss/explore the subject with someone of a differing mindset?
I essentially agree with you that it doesn’t really belong in the “conspiracy community” though.
I can't stand that annoying AF music in the background, and the arguments are freaking senseless--not going to watch it all.
there are better ones on here https://www.theflatearthpodcast.com/must-see-videos/ ... hope you enjoy some of them ... but the WHY does it matter is HUGE and no annoying music
The one you picked was horrendous and had laughable arguments. We can measure the coastline of Antarctica and therefore know it cannot encircle all the continents and oceans of the flat earth model they propose. It is so stupid that none of them can actually believe that what they are saying is true. Nobody does.
your 'opinion' ... stay a baller then, doesn't matter to me
these are horrendous to you? https://www.theflatearthpodcast.com/must-see-videos/
i'll tell you what is laughable, you believing you can see the sun that is 93 MILLION miles away ... that is laughable
always have to 'imagine' their 'theories' lol ... and really? you think its not hard to imagine seeing something 93 million miles away ... because it is huge? wow
I don’t blame you. I prefer discussion myself.
If you’d ever care to explore/discuss this subject further (including just to express your criticisms!) please join me on the community I created specifically for that! I’d be happy to answer any and all questions you might have (if I can)!
Click my username and find the link, or let me know and I’ll pm it to you!