post any inconsistencies/absurdities you've found
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
less serious observations:
"Robb" elementary (the kids were trafficked or "robbed" of their "lives"...did all of them exist in the first place?)
Uvalde-> anagram of "valued", children "valued" for their $
113 months, 11 days after Sandy Hook
I haven't seen anyone yet who thinks that people were not shot.
It is completely plausible that that part is completely real regardless of everything else. Discussing the possibilities of this event being allowed to happen and even made possible by the authorities does not mean that everyone thinks the casualties were faked. A staged event could easily have been planned to have real deaths.
A big part of this discussion is also about the response from the media, law enforcement, politicians and the general public. Talking about the inconsistencies and agenda pushing there also doesn't necessarily mean the people discussing those issues believe that nobody died.
Read "Behold a Pale Horse". This isn't a new concept
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/William_Cooper-Behold_a_Pale_Horse1991.pdf
page 225
There is also this quote attributed to the book. I'm not sure which page, and that pdf file does not have OCR on many scanned pages.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/william-cooper-conspiracy-theory-711469/
It's easier to enact tyranny to subvert and control a population and remove all their rights when they are unarmed and can not fight back.
When you strip rights quickly and suddenly an armed population might revolt. If they have weapons of equal force it is not so easy. At the time the US Constitution was drafted, you had pistols, rifles, and canon. This put militias on near equal footing to that of regiment military with the exception of numbers, training, and canon.
The US Founding Fathers could not have anticipated how large the force disparity would become over two centuries later. The general citizenry still have access to pistols and rifles while the military have machine guns, planes, tanks, bombs, lasers, ADS and many other weapons.
It's not even close anymore, but still the political class and aristocracy know that as long as a population have weapons, they can not so easily remove average people from society.
That isn't stopping them from conditioning populations to accept slow erosion of rights over successive generations, or the latest tricks involving "pandemics" to isolate and control people under the guise of safety.
Also predicted WEF global digital ID, vaccine passports, social credit score + CBDC
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/william-cooper-conspiracy-theory-711469/
School shooters are sometimes manipulated and other times they are simply known by FBI who do nothing to act before the crime as the outcome serves a political objective.
That is a different topic.
I'm not in the boat of believing fake victims, as it's much easier for the alphabet agencies and their allies to kill or let tragedies happen than to fake deaths.
Collateral damage plays better in mainstream media for dramatic effect and to create political pressure to push objectives quickly.
WHo says the FEDs don't kill? Sandy hook looks to be that way. But 9/11 was straight up mass murder.
This one is looking like mass murder too, but the fucking situation is glowie as fuck.
Nothing makes sense with his motive, his capabilities, his access to both the skills and equipment.Cop behavior glowie as fuck. Changing narrative. etc..
Where did he get a new ford f250 + $6k+ worth of rifles, optics, bodyarmor, ammo.. glow glow glow
This ^ ^
There are conspiracies to be discussed, but wondering why some local official or parent doesn't act appropriately on national TV right after one of the most traumatic events of their lives unfolds; that's not conspiracy that's just stupid.
Dear Wolfgang, documentary is a really good one on Sandy Hook.
Dude, Sandy hook is glow glow glow.
You either glow or are incredibly stupid. I'd go with option ONE from here. Because if you're on this website you should be able to name 20 discrepancies between reality and reports from SH.
So yeah, go fuck yourself.
If you think it's crazy that they would do such a thing (lie to us to further their goals), look no further than the Iraq war, which was based on supposed evidence that the Saddam Hussein regime had weapons of mass destruction. However, it was later proven that the government had no such evidence and lied. Is it really that crazy to assume that these same actors would not lie to us about other things for other ends that they desire?
The Smith Mundt Act was repealed in 2012. This act previously prevented the US government from using false and/or misleading propaganda against its own population. Can you imagine a scenario where a decent government would want to repeal such an act? Is all of this really that hard to imagine being true?
salvador - savior
ramo in spanish is bouquet, as in ramo de flores, bouquet of flowers, or an offering.
conspiracy candy helps discredit those who question