Russia is winning on every front
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
More leftist crazy talk from someone who cannot understand information, it really is not a surprise, what is a surprise is you found yourself at a site such as this instead of staying on reddit, I suspect it is because you are a bit too much of a nazi prick with your leftist ideals so even the other lefties ban you, lol, you are a loser.
Understand your bullshit? No, I don't understand anybody who shits themself. It's not very polite.
You however are still struggling with Geopolitics. The West wants to assume a greedier narrative. It so happens to be next gen tech. That future is limitless profit. Single source energy supplying everything is vast profit. At a cost of today's supply lines. It however causes a run off. Where this conflict comes in. It uses it to assert the solution of implementing that tech. Energy specifically. It doesn't care if its citizens pay more for it, they're a prop goading it. It also uses another prop Russia to force it. No more oil and gas, supply lines restributing. A joke the tech still needs it. But it will sooner release other resources like Venezuela, New Zealand, or grease other wheels embargoed. The tech also ties into agriculture. Big huge automated farms. The run off it causes are massive distribution, and recalibration, logistical problems. Does it cause a bigger war? This often happens every time, tech forces solutions, or further down that road. Russia gaining for 5 minutes here is pointless to that future. The potential is uncomparible to those forcing it.
They don't care about a few peasants, or playing a few more off. They've rigged the game. It can war, they'll still profit. Or they continue to contain it. Ukraine being armed bogs down Russia. It affects the supply lines they're restricting, and redistributing. Without forcing it, they simply don't upgrade, because who likes paying more. Nobody. Easier to force it. Although almost every time, it causes greater conflict. Tech doesn't care, it's the future anyway. Those profiting off it, profit regardless. But they've rigged that game. Cause the problem, force the solution, it's another advancement of profit off the demand they've caused for the tech being forced.
Please assume something else. You're a joke. This article is bullshit. Slicing their own lines causes, what. But they're still in control. Why? What are they doing? You thought they're losing. Joke.
There are heaps more concerns. Security and restructuring those lines, and eliminating risk, or containing it. But the population has caught up. The tech has advanced quicker than the debts of implementing it slower, or the geopolitics of it affecting other logistics. Away from this, they're mostly naive to almost anything but the greed they're empowering from the demand they're forcing. It has advanced and they use it too assume control. Cannot have it, without the other run off, being precipitated. As a result it implodes. Too what degree is the only question? But that future ahead is dark. It doesn't calm without its run off affecting far more. It didn't care anyway, because it was never about anything else, except assuming control.
How many people run this account? Sometimes you appear to leave a comment that is worth reading, other times you get this, incoherent ramblings of a leftist technocrat emboldened with the belief in the topics of brainwash from the talking heads..
Most of this comment reads as if you are a madman rushing from point to point without ever taking the time to actually rationalize the claims made along the way.
So let's break some of it down a bit and review wtf you on about.
You claim I am struggling with an understanding of current geopolitics. And this is from the standpoint where you declare nato is running such superior gear that the Russians cannot compare, and any day now nato forces gonna lay waste to Russia.
You begin to rattle off about energy implying not very much specifically aside from some mention that Russia wants to export it.
You end this blurb stating something minimal about the current operation. None of what you said here is worth anything nor does it even make sense given reality, it is like you really have no idea who needs energy or what it is even for.
I think the statement here is clear, you really have no clue what anything is about at this point, perhaps you were drunk, and anything you did have to say come out all jumbled up. Try again?
First of all, Russia has been internalized, it began in earnest after WW2 and again more recently. Basically implying that the old siege tactics we use, of blockading economy does not work on these guys as well anymore. They have all their own resources and also trade with the other 60% of the world that considers them friendly.
Russia has all the energy it needs, it is the west that wants energy.
West is at war with most countries in the world in the form of economic sanctions.
Russia has its own resources. Self sufficient within reasoning. It is the largest country on the planet. But what it lacks are the modern processors, and semiconductors, or the brands, and often the methods. It hasn't got the technical advantage it used too, in the days of the Soviet Union, where that tech was more competitive. China however might, but again they lack the chips, and processors.
Winning on every front, not completely, and in a proxy war the West haven't even committed too, outside of limited armament and aid is a joke. A joke that falls in line with their agenda. It was an agenda of technology. Specifically divesting from oil and gas to certain extents, and rearranging supply lines, while containing the competition. It forced a narrative.
They cut their own lines to cause a run off. Look how much it is affecting and will affect. It was planned. They must have known what would be caused. Hence the immediate lockstep, and previous charade of unalignmemt.
It still might go to all out war, but it's not at that stage. It has been largely contained. The run off forces tech, and it rearranges supply lines. The perfect opportunity has been created for its agenda. Because there's huge profit to be had on the emerging tech replacing the current systems, not entirely, they still need many resources. But it forces change. Immediately it looks damaging and will get far worse, and may yet still escalate into a larger war.
But winning a battle, or making cash off the current resources still being utilised is a joke to that game being played. It was orchestrated. It falls directly on the money. Into a bunch of narratives forcing change. Russian timing was perfect for that narrative. The climate change, bringing a rush to renewables and nuclear, for the future EVs and whatever technology, even food. While also causing massive spending on arms, and recommiting to partnerships aligning against their boogeyman. Hell it could even contain the rogues, if it goes back to specific sides. Russia simply takes point and they will, who cares, except follow, what. Kick off, no it's all out war. It causes the redistribution of the supply lines, back into sides. Meanwhile a bunch of places go hungry demanding what kind of trade. Russia is in a war, largely sanctioned, but it simply cannot keep up with the demand. Food and fuel and technology etc. Therefore providing a larger opportunity to sell any changes and alignment.
There's always larger war if indeed it commits more too it. There's always more pawns to sacrifice first. Or there's the castle, and indeed check, and stalemate. I don't think there's checkmate, despite the propaganda designed to deflect and distract and provoke, what? A hot war. Russia haven't nuked yet, reiterate that probability. It should be higher than zero, but it isn't. They would have used them. They still might. Because yes it's wildfire. How much burns, where else catches alight, and then what emerges. Are the only questions. You seem to think they're ahead, in a much larger race and its agenda. Without even considering it was designed. Why and for what.
The first comment, you made, must be head up your ass. It sees shit. Because it believes in whatever is in its face. No, seriously. You're complict. Perhaps there's more to it. I always wanted to see a nuke go off. I dare you. Or did you think you can beat Nato without them. Hahaha.
The larger question now, right now. It was forced. Why. No Russia didn't force it. They created an opportunity to go ahead. Hang on. It was forced.
I'll go back to reading the propaganda now. It's easier than thinking. They don't like you thinking, it pisses somebody off. Don't know why. There's a war, or something. Let me know if I am attacked.
heh, well. a bit of a spread here.
Russia has about 40% of the worlds resources and about 2% of the population, this is likely the main driver behind the fear mongering pushed by the west. We are nearing an energy crisis manufactured to ensure profits. The corruption we have run worldwide has brought everything to the brink, mostly due to dissatisfaction, there are plenty of resources and plenty of room. The greed and the focus on taking ownership causes all conflicts.
So, lets get back to the chips and ic's and other lovely bits, when it comes to that stuff, Russia is not as far behind as you want to believe, the size is slightly larger implying slightly slower also. But... the registers are way larger, the cpu they have is going to destroy everyone of the others.. as usual. So no worries on the tech front, between China and India, the west is in a bad way in the tech market.
Indeed, Russia and the rest of the world has been fighting poverty and suppression from all angles for a long time, they are the up and comers, but the west had it's day and pissed it away, failed to maintain the lead and are now in the dark ages.
West is searching for just one more boom before the bust, they promise to not piss it away this time.
nato has no equipment to use against Russia that is going to have any effect. None. it will be a fast war and its all about rocket speed. I do not think nuclear weapons will be used on cities, Russia is professional, they intend to only take out military targets. Unless we send one of our nukes to a city, you just will not see that happen.
This is the slow decline, WW3 has been active since Iraq version 1.0, the same form of military activity has been constant with hardly any breaks. All the while stealing and capitalizing on theft, now those days are done. nothing left to steal. up against the big boys and still not enough gumption to even land a successful hit.
You like to downplay the activity in europe and ukraine for the past 75 years, it has been non stop. constant. The total amount of value lost money spent is incomprehensible nato has been there the whole time growing and manipulating with the cia.
Russia dominates the entire world on the military stage with the fact that they own missile speed as well as air defence. The newest jet they have is pretty awesome.
Everyone knows it.