Why not just starve out the least productive continent with the highest growth rate?
Wipe out a half a billion living humans and another billion in expected growth, over 3 years, we can raise the average IQ on the planet by 25 points, reduce the rate of war crimes and give the next few generations a meaning in a quest to recolonize the wilds of africa.
Well, #2 won't work since niggers are too stupid for effective brainwashing (lack the impulse control, capability for abstract thought, and collectivism for it). #4 is no go because of all the biodiversity and natural resources. #3 has been going on a for awhile (think AIDS, Ebola), but again they're catching on.
As for #1, got to think about how it really works (read the beginning of Behold A Pale Horse to get details): resource and population feedback and oscillate. So to get a big crash, you drive the population up then suddenly withdraw the resources. That's what all the "humanitarian aid" was for.
My plan is pay reparations to western blacks to surrender citizenship and live as upper class in apefrica, get china to invest in building cheap western style apartment housing for 40-50 million people and make the african countries take out the upfront loans to china promising to begin their payments after 10 years, african countries will be good for it considering their collective IQ is about to jump 10 points and their standard of education should also increase (this is all from a liberal progressive worldview, these things seem logical to such deluded souls but wont happen in actuality) the new african upper class will need servants, goods, housing and services creating a market demand that should cause an investment boom and the birth of an african middle class. These prospect qill make this whole process desirable for africa and china alike and our exported blacks will see it as a free ticket/ early retirement with solid investment opportunities along the way, we just need some treaties granting protections to these remigrants preventing price gouging and predatory taxation or market practices which the US army has right to enforce if treaty parties are in violation. In actuality we are just going to make their supply lines very fragile and dependant on our exports in the middle of their own population boom and then cut all food aid and claim it's because of an airborne rabies epidemic which we'll use as an excuse to blockade africa.
starvation hits 3rd world the hardest and pushes them to immigrate into the next tier countries. Avg IQ of recipient countries is reduced, which is the optimal function for the ruling class.
Say they have an airborne rabies pandemic, blame the violence and cannibalism on the rabies, make clear that even aid in the form of bottled water would be wasted on the poor wretches.
Why not just starve out the least productive continent with the highest growth rate?
Wipe out a half a billion living humans and another billion in expected growth, over 3 years, we can raise the average IQ on the planet by 25 points, reduce the rate of war crimes and give the next few generations a meaning in a quest to recolonize the wilds of africa.
Well, #2 won't work since niggers are too stupid for effective brainwashing (lack the impulse control, capability for abstract thought, and collectivism for it). #4 is no go because of all the biodiversity and natural resources. #3 has been going on a for awhile (think AIDS, Ebola), but again they're catching on.
As for #1, got to think about how it really works (read the beginning of Behold A Pale Horse to get details): resource and population feedback and oscillate. So to get a big crash, you drive the population up then suddenly withdraw the resources. That's what all the "humanitarian aid" was for.
My plan is pay reparations to western blacks to surrender citizenship and live as upper class in apefrica, get china to invest in building cheap western style apartment housing for 40-50 million people and make the african countries take out the upfront loans to china promising to begin their payments after 10 years, african countries will be good for it considering their collective IQ is about to jump 10 points and their standard of education should also increase (this is all from a liberal progressive worldview, these things seem logical to such deluded souls but wont happen in actuality) the new african upper class will need servants, goods, housing and services creating a market demand that should cause an investment boom and the birth of an african middle class. These prospect qill make this whole process desirable for africa and china alike and our exported blacks will see it as a free ticket/ early retirement with solid investment opportunities along the way, we just need some treaties granting protections to these remigrants preventing price gouging and predatory taxation or market practices which the US army has right to enforce if treaty parties are in violation. In actuality we are just going to make their supply lines very fragile and dependant on our exports in the middle of their own population boom and then cut all food aid and claim it's because of an airborne rabies epidemic which we'll use as an excuse to blockade africa.
starvation hits 3rd world the hardest and pushes them to immigrate into the next tier countries. Avg IQ of recipient countries is reduced, which is the optimal function for the ruling class.
Say they have an airborne rabies pandemic, blame the violence and cannibalism on the rabies, make clear that even aid in the form of bottled water would be wasted on the poor wretches.