Social media and content moderation experts said Twitch’s quick response was the best that could reasonably be expected. But the fact that the response did not prevent the video of the attack from being spread widely on other sites also raises the issue of whether the ability to livestream should be so easily accessible.
“I’m impressed that they got it down in two minutes,” said Micah Schaffer, a consultant who has led trust and safety decisions at Snapchat and YouTube. “But if the feeling is that even that’s too much, then you really are at an impasse: Is it worth having this?”
The argument is that you should have 50 followers to livestream. Like you should have 50 "employees" before you're really a business. I'm getting Edison Carter Live & Direct vibes.
Oh, I'm in perfect sympathy with you, I just like to advert to others how much was said and how much we inferred; and we need to be alert to what the new proposed control will be.
Scored has been a godsend to break up these lockdowns.
Good gloss. But what they actually said was:
The argument is that you should have 50 followers to livestream. Like you should have 50 "employees" before you're really a business. I'm getting Edison Carter Live & Direct vibes.
Oh, I'm in perfect sympathy with you, I just like to advert to others how much was said and how much we inferred; and we need to be alert to what the new proposed control will be.
Scored has been a godsend to break up these lockdowns.