How does it feel to be on the same side as antifa?
(i.postimg.cc)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
a) differentiation represents flow causing momentum aka a self differentiation from velocity (flow) into resistance (form); both separated from each other by momentum (balance in motion).
b) INTEGRA'TION, noun- "the act of making entire" ignores that energy represents the entire making the lesser within itself; hence an internal balance of ongoing loss (velocity) and temporary growth (resistance). From our perspective it represents being IN (within) TEGRA (whole) -TION (through action); hence being the lesser reaction (perceiving) within the enacted (perceivable).
c) UNIVERSE; noun (unitas) - "the state of being one (within all); oneness (of all)". As one within all breathing (spiro; spirit) represents adaption to input aka impression (perception) to compression (comprehension) to expression (growth) or regression (loss).
From the perspective of the oneness of all (energy)...only the internal center (choice) has to adapt by breathing; the rest represents a balance (momentum of ongoing motion).
d) when velocity meets resistance you get friction; vibration and resonance/dissonance...that's where the breathing operates; at the core of self sustaining energy, where each temporary part has to adapt to ongoing change.
a) VARIANT (changeable) implies being within change; hence to be (form) out of (flow) aka form transmuted by flow.
b) the great big number always represents ONE; hence NUMBER; noun - "the designation of a unit (unitas; the state of being one; oneness)". The suggestion of counting tempts to ignore the perceivable differentiation of oneness; and the ignorance of need (perceivable) for want (suggested) causes the lack of self discernment as being one within all; hence different from anyone else. Counting implies the suggestion of sameness.
One can shape differences alike; yet never the same; because to be able to perceive anything perceivable implies it existing in a different position (form) within the same source (flow). The parasitic few are all in when it comes to destroying perceivable differences by suggesting the ignorant many to pretend to be alike aka "E pluribus unum" (out of many; one).
c) as for sunlight..before light comes motion; otherwise no transfer of light; no ignition of light.
That's one of the main deceptions...CALL, verb transitive [Heb. To hold or restrain.] - "to drive; to strain or force out sound". That represents flow; while form represents the response to that aka the recall.
Sleight of hand: Total (ALL) Recall (ONE) and the company in the book/movie was called Recall Incorporated aka ONE within corpus oration (the whisper of death; allegory for ignorance).
And every free will of choice represents the resonance (need) or dissonance (want) within it. We represent mimics aka copies of the original theme; able to shape themselves any which way; while the original is always there for recovery.
Solution represents the immaterial source of perspective aka the motion that communicates towards perceiving senses.
PROB'LEM, noun (Latin problema) - "to throw forward". Those who lead are shaping problems through those who follow. The solution represents the perceivable momentum that already is; not whatever others suggest can be reached.
EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". Flow aka velocity represents the "line of work" for the resulting formed resistance (to be within), and velocity meeting resistance represents the source of friction.
Sleight of hand: "It's not unusual it happens every day"..."No matter what you say"..."You'll find it happens all the time"
Reaction (living resistance) produced by action (dying velocity) within work (energy). Try living without resisting dying. Byproduct or center or production?
POW'ER, noun (Latin potentia) - "to exert force". That represents the potentiality of ALL flow; which implies the resulting potential of each ONE form within to grow (resistance) within loss (velocity). Both forces of power (velocity/resistance) coexist in balance (momentum) with each other; hence representing the internal power of energy (work) aka a self sustaining system..."doing the work itself".
The circuit represents the momentum for living within the motion of dying. The parasitic few suggest closed circuits to distract the many from being the center (choice) of the whole circuit (balance). Consent (by choice) to the suggested (by choice) closed circuit tricks one to spend resistance to other resistance; hence making them stronger and yourself weaker. The few utilize the many as a battery; a closed circuit; while harvesting the ignored growth of resistance; which works because there are always "many" more for the few to leech upon.
While you are suggested to look at the behavior of "it"; you are tempted to ignore that the current of inception towards death is pushing through your life. Both the ignored perceivable reality (need) and the suggested fiction (want) are "working" together within the same balance (need/want) based system; which you are being tricked to ignore for the suggest on (want) vs off (not want) imbalance of "its" behavior.
Sleight of hand: "Stephen King's "It". Who ignored it? The adults. Who resisted it? The children. Harvesting the accumulated power of ignorance while luring fresh resistance with suggested temptations. PENNY (small sum aka ONE within ALL) WISE (to know; to perceive).
Inductance (velocity) and resistance aren't added to energy; but represent its internal balance. That ain't the extraction of work; but the self sustenance of work (energy). Existence (to be) implies out of; hence form (differentiation) out of flow (sameness) aka potential (difference) out of potentiality (sameness).
MACHINE; noun (Latin machina) - "artificial work" represents the internal reaction to the enacted natural work.
Sleight of hand from Pink Floyd: "Welcome, my son"..."Welcome to the machine"... "Where have you been?"..."It's alright, we know where you've been".
ALL READY for what? For the ONEs within. Now try living without dying...it's hard. In other words...what's there represents ongoing; trying harder represents the temporary within the ongoing.
"I'm Adam (a man; temporary one); Prince (sovereign) of Eternia (the ongoing all)"...
"I'm Adora (Latin adoro; honor; highest estimation aka choice); He-Man's (one) Twin (resembling another) Sister (out of the same)"...
"Louis Scheimer (October 19, 1928 – October 17, 2013) was an American producer and voice actor who was one of the original founders of Filmation"; "Scheimer (SHY-mer) was the son of a German-jew who, according to family legend, had to leave Germany in the early 1920s after punching a young Adolf Hitler in 1921 or 1922, "well before" the Beer Hall Putsch"...what a "Brave-Starr"; wasn't he?
One is subjected to thinking through incoming perceivable differences; yet one is tempted to ignore this for suggested sameness; like standing in lines.
Because they coexist within the same moment (um) as differentiation (living) within sameness (dying). Only this moment (balance) sustains choice in-between.
That represents exploiting the ignorance of perceived through suggestion. The already domesticated audience is waiting to get the comedy they want; while the comedian exploits the established consent of the many towards comedy to change the definition aka idolatry (that's what comedy means); revisionism (what the comedian can shape it into); and contradiction (when comedy turns to drama). Setup a really funny introduction and make the punchline "that ain't funny" and watch the audience choke on their laughter.
The guff represents suggested information; yet anyone can utilize whatever you write as perceivable inspiration, which implies seeing more and more through the suggestions; while utilizing what they express. Like you putting every topic into the context of your life; while I try shaping topics within the ongoing foundation. It's the perceivable difference that inspire me; that I learn/teach myself from.
"going nowhere" represents the want to go somewhere; which ignores the need to resist being moved towards death, and associating nowhere with AB'SOLUTE, adjective [Latin absolutus.] - "absolve; to set free" ignores that everywhere (balance) sets free (choice). AB (separated form) SOLUTION (separating flow).
What's the implication of saying the story (life) lacks an ending (death)? What if others suggest outcome oriented narratives to tempt one to want an ending?
Neither would the yak want you to.
The older one gets the more velocity (flow) becomes noticeable; because resistance (form) is being reduced by it...unless being resisted. Becoming faster represents form being transmuted back to flow; hence "problem solved".
If only there was something that prevents the velocity of my nunchuncks to saw through its bindings like a rusty knife through stale bread? Here's my reaction when I found out about gromit... https://pic8.co/sh/WIzj3F.jpg
RE (response to) MOVED (being moved); hence living within dying aka the temporary growth within an ongoing removal process.
a) MANAGE (to conduct; to carry on aka enacting flow) MENT (mind; memory aka responding form)
b) KING (sovereign aka choice) SHIP (the formed vessel within flow)
c) it's suggested leadership which tempts one to follow; suggested kingship which tempts one to submit to the choices of others; suggested management that tempts one to ignore that inspiration conducts (manages) memory (ment)...unless for suggested information.
Take bees for example...it's not about following the queen; the hive represents the expressed growth of the queen aka the ecosystem surrounding the queen; while sustaining her.
Counting is suggested to tempt belief in sameness; while ignoring perceivable differentiation. What one does before choosing to count others represents responding as a difference (form) out of sameness (flow) to moving differences (inspiration) perceived. The choice to count then tempts to ignore this. Everything perceivable represents ONE (form) within ALL (flow). The constantly changing differentiation perceived is there to inspire ONE to sustain ONEself; which requires differentiation as inspiration; since sameness wouldn't inspire the struggle to resist anything (everything).
When you separate "we" from "the" universe (oneness); then you ignore that the impressing flow; your compressing choice, and forms expressing resistance represents the oneness of breathing in separated functions.
"master of the artificial" also ignores that artificial represents the subjected response within the enacting natural. Would you brand the balance of action/reaction as master/slave or would the latter tempt to ignore the implicated motion of the former?
Aka form within flow; difference within same; part within whole.
Because the enlightened mind represents the expression of ALL light through ONEself; hence yet another beacon of inspiration standing out.
With momentum as the vessel into which flow distills form one by one.
Ongoing flow represents the arraigning order towards the mind of the rearranging form. The item (article) represents the separated charge (resisting form) and rare (not frequent) represents being the temporary choice in need of frequently resisting the ongoing frequency of balance (momentum of motion).
Counting in accordance to perceivable need implies "enough" aka the balance-point when need turns to want. That represents ones inner struggle to stay as choice within balance; yet suggesting to count and attaching brands upon counted; that's all in ignorance of balance.
The "no more" represents the ignorance towards the ongoing aka the endless more of everything; hence being tempted all the way back to base. If you proclaim "no more" to others; you use suggestion to tempt them into self restricting their choices; while using it upon yourself represents an expression of the inner struggle with the temptation of ignorance. It's funny to think that one would use choice to shape the "no more" suggestion against choice to curtail the temptation of falling for suggestions.
Ignorance shapes the commonly perceived into the rarely comprehended inspiration.
"things" imply you perceive them at different positions within the same foundation. Two identical bottles imply you perceiving one bottle that looks like another one bottle. You being able to compare implies comparing perceivable differences; upon which you then chose to suggest sameness; which was suggested to you by others who industrialize making things alike to tempt you to ignore differences; because if you are different; then that implies you representing a different ONE within the same ALL...that's unique; that has potential and a free will of choice to shape that.
Question if different (perceivable) then sameness (comprehensible)? Start with...if different (life) then sameness (inception towards death) or if different (to be) then sameness (out of)...
a) ALL represents ONE in energy. You represent ONE (form) within ALL (flow); which is perceivable; while the ONEness of ALL (energy) represents the comprehensible. If one grows self discernment of the former; then further discernment about origin can be grown.
b) "they" implies perceivable by you; hence a differentiated form within the momentum of the same flow.
The parasites have a very effective suggestion to justify the ignorance thereof by blaming others..."that doesn't make any sense". I get these accusations all the time; yet when I ask how one can perceive something with ones senses to be able to make the suggestion that it doesn't make sense...they get angry; while using the next effective justification in the list: "you're not human; you're a bot".
Instead of overlooking a bit; it's more akin to have both hands over ones eyes while screaming: "I'm blind".
If you suspect trickery; question the opposite thereof; in this case...difference. If somebody suggests something to be alike; akin and the same; then the comprehension of differences can inspire you to perceive "something" as to imply perceivable differences; which then further implies a responding choice that shapes the suggestion of sameness out of it; which then implies the response-ability of your choice to resist suggested (want) for perceived (need).
Before that...comprehending perceivable sound over suggested words disarms most word trickery.
Within momentum; velocity (flow) meets resistance (form), hence causing friction.
All suggested towards consenting choice.
Keeping the suggested fiction as the wool of ignorance over perceivable reality protects the suggesting parasite from the consenting host.
The whole mars setup was about being isolated within a hostile environment; which turns out to be artificially suggested by the few to keep the many isolated and in ignorance; which gets resolved by good guys lifting the spell; yet not before bad guy gets his mind blown (literally) by the very environment he made hostile.
That represents the perceivable sound as the source of resonance; while the responding choice has both the need (resonance) and want (dissonance) option for adaptation.
Want set into motion corrupts into exponetial more want; and if one gets anything wanted; it loses value to wanting more different things. This is why life is sustained by need aka the struggle to resist the temptation of want.
A treasure chest represents hidden temptation; which within a dungeon implies deliberate placement. If you venture into a dungeon to slay a dragon; would you really accumulate treasures on your way in? And just like that I solved the mystery as to how the dragon would accumulate a pile of treasures...it's the stupid heroes dragging it to him.
...dissolving one whole (flow) into more substances (form) within the momentum of itself.
Notice "set free" aka setting "free" will of choice into the "dom"inance of balance; hence separating free-dom into coexistence.
The potentiality (complete) for each potential (lacking) within; hence establishing growth potential.
Tried it once; liked it; stayed away from it ever since. As for flow...getting flow implies being form within line.
Dying as the base should inspire the resistance of the living; yet suggested progressivism (want of outcomes) corrupted the living to ignore perceived inspiration (death) for suggested information (alternatives).
Chasing the tempation of wants, dying from the consequences thereof, pretending to have evaluated the need to sustain life.
The suggested norm represents affixed; the perceived order implies ongoing, so that's what's gonna break the norm.
That represents trying to capture the moment; while ignoring momentum, and their consent to your suggested symbolism represents the cause of their arguing (reasoning).
Who produces the stuff; the things and the ability to make stuff into things other than NATURE, noun - "born, produced"? Also; within all perceivable...what isn't given to the ones perceiving?
Because the meaning represents being processed while responding to it.
SET'TLE, verb transitive [from set] - "to place in a permanent condition after wandering or fluctuation". Flow represents the permanent state; form the temporary one.
To be able implies out of enabling.
Why do the few use suggestion to paint perpetual motion as a pipe-dream? To tempt the many to ignore being the temporary resistance within perpetual motion. Of course a perpetual motion machine build out of temporary parts mimicking perpetual motion cannot ever be achieved; yet look how easy it is to suggest the majority of mankind to ignore being temporary (life) within perpetual (inception towards death).
In other words...ONE represents the machine within ALL perpetual motion; so "Welcome, my son"..."Welcome to the machine"
What about the suggested "without" inside the perceivable "within"? How could ONE within ALL be without? I've seen more sophistication in the eyes of deer in my headlights; than within the faces of those I asked this question.
Fascinating how a few choices can alter paths so severely.
"It's addictive and destructive"..."It can overcome your mind and take over your body...an nothing can stop it"~ The Stuff (temptation) as suggested by Larry Cohen. I liked that flick.
Props to whoever wrote "Mein Kampf". The line about history being about cramping the students heads with endless suggested names; dates and locations; while never teaching the connection to the student himself. That was one of the few things that got me thinking back in the days.
Look into the world fairs. The few seem to combine nation wrecking; large scale resettlement, and cultural resets with a showcase of former glory; before ceremoniously destroying it. The whole Hitler loved architecture angle just smells like the narrated setup for the destruction that followed; especially Dresden.
Exchange "just gotta" (rhetorical justification) for "need" and then question that again. Hunger represents the needed foundation underneath groceries; and evaluation by choice the foundation underneath money. Both already being fully exploited by the suggestions of others; hence having to pay for food; while pretending that money represents value.
You are here questioning behavior within an already controlled environment by others; controlled with the power of your consent to it.
What one sets into motion while doing so represents the devaluation of choice. It's what led to the slaves of world wide poverty to be utilized against the worshipers of mammon.
To pay (discharging a debt) represents person to person discharge of resistance; which ignores resisting velocity (value) for recharge of resistance (evaluation). Notice that getting what you want devalues it; once you have it. That represents the lowering of your resistance to the temptation of wanting more.
Never really like Jo either.
Hence fiction in ignorance of reality...ONE already fits into ALL, and ALL puts each ONE into itself through self differentiation. Artificial counterfeits natural; hence "a manifestation of some collective hallucination" aka the suggested meaning by the few that the many are consenting to.
Another allegory for form (I and things) ignoring (to label) flow (disappear into the archives). Not only will all the suggested labels disappear back to base; but they also corrupt ones comprehension of being moved by the same base. Forms liability within flow represents resistance by choice.
The base for both the alembic vessel (momentum) and the ingredient fire (form) within. One can snuff out a fire; but it can be rekindled any moment; hence existing as the formed reaction within the enacted momentum of flow.
Ongoing velocity causes a momentum; which then distills temporary parts of the ongoing whole into momentum aka loss causing its own internal growth. Both together representing the internal self sustenance of energy.
Reacting inside to enacted outside.
Aka form choosing to hit; to strike; to have friction with; to spend resistance on other form. When one counts "two"; than one ignore differentiated ones; while holding onto sameness "two"; hence causing internal friction among form. In martial arts one reacts to mitigate friction; not seeking it; hence the parasites suggesting martial arts to contest for prizes aka friction for glory aka Ali for adult diapers and spoon-fed meals.
I go with redirecting the incoming; while letting my blades get a little slice of friction.
"They" can't be identical since you already perceived "them" as differentiated from each other; while trying to reason about suggested likeness. As for cloning...that's just a slap in the face for those who ignore ONEs transmutation out of base ALL aka the cultivation out of original oneness (energy). And how did tptb (the parasites that be) call their initial clone? Dolly the sheep aka DOLL, noun [Greek; an idol; to see.]
I had an issue with using all the fancy martial arts kickpads; when attaching them to the trees in our garden; which scared the birds; bees and squirrels away. After I used halved bamboo sticks; most of the noise and vibration reduced to the point where the buzzing upstairs continues while I go to town downstairs.
When they were needed to build up the next racket for all the others; which is now coming to its rotten fruition. The following rebuilding will establish more salt of the earth types for the next round. Right now we are in this clusterfuck of an overripe rule by deception era; yet still mostly cuddled enough to watch it all burn some more before we really have to get inventive and prosperous again.
IN (within) SIGHT (perceivable) hence differentiated potential to grow comprehension; which you ignore when suggesting "equal truth".
Equality represents suggested likeness under the umbrella of sameness; which when consented to, causes the conflict of reason (true vs false) which destroys differences. E pluribus unum (out of many one) represents the suggested inversion of the comprehensible (out of oneness many).
One perceives differences; the few suggest sameness by tempting the many to consent to react alike (chain of command; uniformity; following the party-line; agreeing with the mainstream; democratically submitting to be governed by others; consenting to suggestion contract law (religion) etc.)
Sensing changing differences represents communicated inspiration for adaptation. That ain't a problem: but how the solution inspires reaction.
A great sleight of hand for that goes "I am whatever you say I am; if I wasn't then why would I say I am?" Others will keep suggesting accusations about what you are; yet if consent by agreeing or disagreeing with their suggestion; does their accusation gain power. You were perceivable to them before they could make the suggestion about what you are...so you already were.
The song itself is called "The way I am" aka the way (flow) I am (form). That simple.
As a difference; "alike; akin" represents the sales-pitch for ignoring being different for sameness. Try to come up with "two" things that are the same and the "two" contradicts sameness whatever alike; akin things you come up with. If you can perceive one and another one; then that implies that you represent another perceivable different one.
What they are selling represents suggested nothing (the ignorance of everything perceivable) aka Seinfeld's Nothing Pitch.
"and"...if one can count it; then one perceives it as different from another one (I get the love for bamboo canisters though).
Aka being open to consent to suggestions.
Aka always a temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested.
To mix ignores that sound differentiates from source; hence the struggle required to maintain harmony (resonance). Suggested words represent the dissonance within perceivable sound; since the words tempt to reason over affixed meaning; instead of finding level resonance) with the flowing sound by resisting to be flushed by it.
Aka resisting to grow their suggestions by growing your own comprehension of perceivable instead, hence shaping whatever others suggest to your perspective in accordance to the natural order.
The foundation represents the perceivable natural order (flow to form); which the few utilize by suggesting the many the inversion thereof. So now you have natural law cloaked in admiralty law; while the many get legalese for their ignorance.
It tempts to ignore the ongoing temptation (velocity) and ones responsibility (resistance) within it.
Want represents spending resistance to get; need represents recharging resistance by adapting to everything already supplied. Furthermore; the "in the way" idiom represents suggested progressivism (seeking to go with the way); while ignoring to be the temporary resistance within the ongoing way.
When a dragon walks into S-Mart and asks the clerk for home invasion repellent and Bruce Campbell turns around: "This is my boomstick"...“It's a twelve-gauge double-barreled Remington, S-Mart's top-of-the-line. You can find this in the sporting goods department. That's right, this sweet baby was made in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Retails for about $109.95. It's got a walnut stock, cobalt blue steel, and a hair-trigger.”
“That's right. Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart.”
Writing under the influence...I can't recall ever trying that.
Within ALL each ONE represents the center where loss and growth are processed within momentum; like self sustaining filtration from base to ingredient and back to base. Then again...representing the remains of filtration doesn't sound that flattering.
a) when you comprehend something; then it was there before; freely perceivable; ready for you to adapt to. Think back over your progression through martial arts...the potential just had to be grown; it wasn't kept secret from you.
b) SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus; seg; to separate] aka differentiation through motion; which represents the foundation that establishes growth within loss. The parasites suggest it as concealed from sight; when the differentiation represents gaining and then further growing sight.
ONE knows (perceives) ALL (perceivable) from ones perspective at the center; while "out there" represents suggestions form others tempting to ignore balancing within center.
MAG'IC, noun - " the application of natural causes to passive subjects". Once again a status quo of subjected reaction (form) within natural action (flow). To react as the subject to the natural cause implies applying nature; hence expressing it through self.
"Eine kleine; wurzellose; internationale clique..." (a little; rootless; international group). All influence represents upon the chain of command formed through choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law by the few for the many. The infrastructure of influence represents the ignorance of them many towards being the response to a flow state; hence being form IN (within) FLUENCE (flow).
It's also not about crossing paths; but about comprehending the only one path (inception towards death); which then makes you noticeable from the many who're just aimlessly wandering around.
I'm well aware of the world stage; its reoccurring scripts; the side-show of theater and movies to cast prospects for the world stage; the humiliation rituals for access to the larger roles; the reappearances of actors in different roles; the exit stage left scenarios designed to recast young talents, and the endless editing to clean up in-between intersecting scripts. As for helping others...it's their choice. Telling them a politician represents a Muppet with a hand up his ass doesn't really inspire them to grow themselves.
The Sopranos. Huge implicating setup...credits. Totally fucked with the audience and their expectations and confirmation addictions.
For me it's perceiving others expressing different behavior; which inspires me to adapt to it. While doing it; I'm not only growing my comprehension about whatever perceived; while my consciousness constantly fetches cross-related inspiration to draw from; I also get more and more efficient at translating what others express into my perspective; which helps me express myself among my family.
It's because those others will constantly drag you back to what you already wrote; which corrupts your expression of adaptation to whatever goes on. Adding to this comes their want for more; and you being tempted to respond in behalf of them instead of for the sustenance of self.
If choice represents the highest value (evaluation); then evaluating the recital of former choices "makes for a poor story".
Hence tempting life to ignore growing for the suggested "larger than life" his-story by others, and ignoring to grow implies ignoring to resist being reduced.
Response from the family: "but we had fish yesterday"..."looks kinda dusty"..."you're late; we already ate; but there's some cold cuts in the fridge if you like".
The few seem to be using cemeteries; golf courses and environmentally protected zones as cover for their destruction of former civilization; jsut like they designate older architecture as libraries; parliaments; post offices; prison; mental institutions etc. The pharaohs resting their pieces in pyramids stories fit that modus operandi..."now watch some more mummy movies; peasants and remember that the brain goes through the nose".
Knives and sticks are my bread and butter; but I like nunchucks with different weights to train the wrists and they are great to train others; because they teach their own lessons to any mistakes made.
Bees don't want to follow you; you wanted something from bees; which inspired them to need to chase you away.
That's tons of choices (form) within the balance (momentum) of the only path (flow). P'ATH, noun [Gr. to tread.] is being suggested to tempt choice to ignore perceivable position (at the center of balance); yet path perceived implies direction for which there's only one (forwards motion).
When you choose a path...question the origin of choice first. You aren't at the crossroads; but resisting being directed towards the only outcome. Your choice of resistance defines when you reach it.
That's because the foundation for your choice represents self sustenance and so wherever one chooses to wander implies within supplied needs for self sustenance. Whatever problem one's facing; the solution is always perceivable.
Light (comprehension); Dark (ignorance). The more you spear and smoke; the more efficient you become; which will increase your potential to comprehend more and more about what you perceive.
Self sustenance expressing itself outwards; hence representing inspiration to all those who adapt to it for their own self sustenance. Helping on the other hand is directed at others or in response to their suggestions; hence want over need aka being tempted away from self sustenance.
"The Chosen One" aka the one with the choice.
"You've got to burn to shine" aka resisting the source of light to grow within.
"The world turned upside down" aka inversion of perceived by suggestion.
"Since the Blues (jews) walked into town"
Because the words suggested tempt compliance to the "norm"; instead of adaptation to constant change aka resisting the natural order. Resisting the source of power (velocity) recharges resistance.
And there's the difference between standing under (understanding) others and compressing (comprehension) within self. Understanding tempts to tout suggested information to others; comprehension requires the inner struggle to resist temptation from others.
Reasoning (choice vs choice aka form vs form) drains resistance of form within flow; hence imbalancing choice within balance, and since reasoning represents want vs not want; the wants keep sucking you in. On the other hand...the different behavior of others represents inspiration for the picking. It's their domesticated sameness patterns that get old quick; because for you they represent a rapid frequency of tempting suggestions.
The few are suggesting this order following behavior so that the many tempt each other to consent to domesticate their free will of choice and the resulting expressions. For example the modern liberals used as foot-soldiers of degeneracy; while staffed with the usual communist revolutionaries are cloaking themselves in the expression of being different; while all responding alike. All those different hair colors; yet the similar screeching.
Strength represent animation; choice represents the tool of the animated to grow strength. Animation represents value; the animated reacting represent evaluation. Without evaluation there couldn't be value; hence evaluation (perceiving) representing the highest value (perceivable). Both are coexisting.
Animation; flow; dominance; natural order etc. represents that which rules and the source of all strength.
Wish; want; free "will" of choice. Balance (momentum) represents the need which requires the center want (choice) to function as balance.
Choice represents sovereignty within balance (among all other choices); while being dominated by balance (momentum).
You are trying to compare the different tools within the tool-shed for power. What you ignore is that the source of power represents the flow differentiating them; and that your power represents access (choice) to the shed (momentum) and everything within (form).
I wrote weapon of choice represents choice; you were tempted to compare weapons while ignoring ones choice. What's a weapon without a choice to utilize it?
...represents being able to grow.
"It's not unusual to be loved by anyone..."
I only ever liked them once Laurel and Hardy brought in the facial expressions that could carry entire scenes without a word. Before that it was like "at the circus" and I'm like "no shit; there's clown".
I started with a heavy duty nine sectional chain whip. That fucking bolt was like magnetically attracted to my ankles for a while and all the neck transfers taught me to never hesitate when in momentum. Nowadays I just use a regular chains with different size locks at the end for weights. Shooting and retracting spikes just isn't necessary when you have blunt force at the end of a high velocity chain.
Double chains; whips and flexible swords I can handle; but that thing does not look like fun. Handling three folded rebounds...that ain't defense anymore; that's a spring mine.