How does it feel to be on the same side as antifa?
(i.postimg.cc)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Counting is suggested to tempt belief in sameness; while ignoring perceivable differentiation. What one does before choosing to count others represents responding as a difference (form) out of sameness (flow) to moving differences (inspiration) perceived. The choice to count then tempts to ignore this. Everything perceivable represents ONE (form) within ALL (flow). The constantly changing differentiation perceived is there to inspire ONE to sustain ONEself; which requires differentiation as inspiration; since sameness wouldn't inspire the struggle to resist anything (everything).
When you separate "we" from "the" universe (oneness); then you ignore that the impressing flow; your compressing choice, and forms expressing resistance represents the oneness of breathing in separated functions.
"master of the artificial" also ignores that artificial represents the subjected response within the enacting natural. Would you brand the balance of action/reaction as master/slave or would the latter tempt to ignore the implicated motion of the former?
Aka form within flow; difference within same; part within whole.
Because the enlightened mind represents the expression of ALL light through ONEself; hence yet another beacon of inspiration standing out.
With momentum as the vessel into which flow distills form one by one.
Ongoing flow represents the arraigning order towards the mind of the rearranging form. The item (article) represents the separated charge (resisting form) and rare (not frequent) represents being the temporary choice in need of frequently resisting the ongoing frequency of balance (momentum of motion).
Counting in accordance to perceivable need implies "enough" aka the balance-point when need turns to want. That represents ones inner struggle to stay as choice within balance; yet suggesting to count and attaching brands upon counted; that's all in ignorance of balance.
The "no more" represents the ignorance towards the ongoing aka the endless more of everything; hence being tempted all the way back to base. If you proclaim "no more" to others; you use suggestion to tempt them into self restricting their choices; while using it upon yourself represents an expression of the inner struggle with the temptation of ignorance. It's funny to think that one would use choice to shape the "no more" suggestion against choice to curtail the temptation of falling for suggestions.
Ignorance shapes the commonly perceived into the rarely comprehended inspiration.
"things" imply you perceive them at different positions within the same foundation. Two identical bottles imply you perceiving one bottle that looks like another one bottle. You being able to compare implies comparing perceivable differences; upon which you then chose to suggest sameness; which was suggested to you by others who industrialize making things alike to tempt you to ignore differences; because if you are different; then that implies you representing a different ONE within the same ALL...that's unique; that has potential and a free will of choice to shape that.
Question if different (perceivable) then sameness (comprehensible)? Start with...if different (life) then sameness (inception towards death) or if different (to be) then sameness (out of)...
a) ALL represents ONE in energy. You represent ONE (form) within ALL (flow); which is perceivable; while the ONEness of ALL (energy) represents the comprehensible. If one grows self discernment of the former; then further discernment about origin can be grown.
b) "they" implies perceivable by you; hence a differentiated form within the momentum of the same flow.
The parasites have a very effective suggestion to justify the ignorance thereof by blaming others..."that doesn't make any sense". I get these accusations all the time; yet when I ask how one can perceive something with ones senses to be able to make the suggestion that it doesn't make sense...they get angry; while using the next effective justification in the list: "you're not human; you're a bot".
Instead of overlooking a bit; it's more akin to have both hands over ones eyes while screaming: "I'm blind".
If you suspect trickery; question the opposite thereof; in this case...difference. If somebody suggests something to be alike; akin and the same; then the comprehension of differences can inspire you to perceive "something" as to imply perceivable differences; which then further implies a responding choice that shapes the suggestion of sameness out of it; which then implies the response-ability of your choice to resist suggested (want) for perceived (need).
Before that...comprehending perceivable sound over suggested words disarms most word trickery.
Within momentum; velocity (flow) meets resistance (form), hence causing friction.
All suggested towards consenting choice.
Keeping the suggested fiction as the wool of ignorance over perceivable reality protects the suggesting parasite from the consenting host.
The whole mars setup was about being isolated within a hostile environment; which turns out to be artificially suggested by the few to keep the many isolated and in ignorance; which gets resolved by good guys lifting the spell; yet not before bad guy gets his mind blown (literally) by the very environment he made hostile.
That represents the perceivable sound as the source of resonance; while the responding choice has both the need (resonance) and want (dissonance) option for adaptation.
Want set into motion corrupts into exponetial more want; and if one gets anything wanted; it loses value to wanting more different things. This is why life is sustained by need aka the struggle to resist the temptation of want.
A treasure chest represents hidden temptation; which within a dungeon implies deliberate placement. If you venture into a dungeon to slay a dragon; would you really accumulate treasures on your way in? And just like that I solved the mystery as to how the dragon would accumulate a pile of treasures...it's the stupid heroes dragging it to him.
...dissolving one whole (flow) into more substances (form) within the momentum of itself.
Notice "set free" aka setting "free" will of choice into the "dom"inance of balance; hence separating free-dom into coexistence.
The potentiality (complete) for each potential (lacking) within; hence establishing growth potential.
Tried it once; liked it; stayed away from it ever since. As for flow...getting flow implies being form within line.
Dying as the base should inspire the resistance of the living; yet suggested progressivism (want of outcomes) corrupted the living to ignore perceived inspiration (death) for suggested information (alternatives).
Chasing the tempation of wants, dying from the consequences thereof, pretending to have evaluated the need to sustain life.
The suggested norm represents affixed; the perceived order implies ongoing, so that's what's gonna break the norm.
That represents trying to capture the moment; while ignoring momentum, and their consent to your suggested symbolism represents the cause of their arguing (reasoning).
Who produces the stuff; the things and the ability to make stuff into things other than NATURE, noun - "born, produced"? Also; within all perceivable...what isn't given to the ones perceiving?
Because the meaning represents being processed while responding to it.
SET'TLE, verb transitive [from set] - "to place in a permanent condition after wandering or fluctuation". Flow represents the permanent state; form the temporary one.
To be able implies out of enabling.
Why do the few use suggestion to paint perpetual motion as a pipe-dream? To tempt the many to ignore being the temporary resistance within perpetual motion. Of course a perpetual motion machine build out of temporary parts mimicking perpetual motion cannot ever be achieved; yet look how easy it is to suggest the majority of mankind to ignore being temporary (life) within perpetual (inception towards death).
In other words...ONE represents the machine within ALL perpetual motion; so "Welcome, my son"..."Welcome to the machine"
What about the suggested "without" inside the perceivable "within"? How could ONE within ALL be without? I've seen more sophistication in the eyes of deer in my headlights; than within the faces of those I asked this question.
Fascinating how a few choices can alter paths so severely.
"It's addictive and destructive"..."It can overcome your mind and take over your body...an nothing can stop it"~ The Stuff (temptation) as suggested by Larry Cohen. I liked that flick.
Props to whoever wrote "Mein Kampf". The line about history being about cramping the students heads with endless suggested names; dates and locations; while never teaching the connection to the student himself. That was one of the few things that got me thinking back in the days.
Look into the world fairs. The few seem to combine nation wrecking; large scale resettlement, and cultural resets with a showcase of former glory; before ceremoniously destroying it. The whole Hitler loved architecture angle just smells like the narrated setup for the destruction that followed; especially Dresden.
Exchange "just gotta" (rhetorical justification) for "need" and then question that again. Hunger represents the needed foundation underneath groceries; and evaluation by choice the foundation underneath money. Both already being fully exploited by the suggestions of others; hence having to pay for food; while pretending that money represents value.
You are here questioning behavior within an already controlled environment by others; controlled with the power of your consent to it.
What one sets into motion while doing so represents the devaluation of choice. It's what led to the slaves of world wide poverty to be utilized against the worshipers of mammon.
To pay (discharging a debt) represents person to person discharge of resistance; which ignores resisting velocity (value) for recharge of resistance (evaluation). Notice that getting what you want devalues it; once you have it. That represents the lowering of your resistance to the temptation of wanting more.
Never really like Jo either.
Hence fiction in ignorance of reality...ONE already fits into ALL, and ALL puts each ONE into itself through self differentiation. Artificial counterfeits natural; hence "a manifestation of some collective hallucination" aka the suggested meaning by the few that the many are consenting to.
Another allegory for form (I and things) ignoring (to label) flow (disappear into the archives). Not only will all the suggested labels disappear back to base; but they also corrupt ones comprehension of being moved by the same base. Forms liability within flow represents resistance by choice.
The base for both the alembic vessel (momentum) and the ingredient fire (form) within. One can snuff out a fire; but it can be rekindled any moment; hence existing as the formed reaction within the enacted momentum of flow.
Ongoing velocity causes a momentum; which then distills temporary parts of the ongoing whole into momentum aka loss causing its own internal growth. Both together representing the internal self sustenance of energy.
Reacting inside to enacted outside.
Aka form choosing to hit; to strike; to have friction with; to spend resistance on other form. When one counts "two"; than one ignore differentiated ones; while holding onto sameness "two"; hence causing internal friction among form. In martial arts one reacts to mitigate friction; not seeking it; hence the parasites suggesting martial arts to contest for prizes aka friction for glory aka Ali for adult diapers and spoon-fed meals.
I go with redirecting the incoming; while letting my blades get a little slice of friction.
"They" can't be identical since you already perceived "them" as differentiated from each other; while trying to reason about suggested likeness. As for cloning...that's just a slap in the face for those who ignore ONEs transmutation out of base ALL aka the cultivation out of original oneness (energy). And how did tptb (the parasites that be) call their initial clone? Dolly the sheep aka DOLL, noun [Greek; an idol; to see.]
I had an issue with using all the fancy martial arts kickpads; when attaching them to the trees in our garden; which scared the birds; bees and squirrels away. After I used halved bamboo sticks; most of the noise and vibration reduced to the point where the buzzing upstairs continues while I go to town downstairs.
When they were needed to build up the next racket for all the others; which is now coming to its rotten fruition. The following rebuilding will establish more salt of the earth types for the next round. Right now we are in this clusterfuck of an overripe rule by deception era; yet still mostly cuddled enough to watch it all burn some more before we really have to get inventive and prosperous again.
IN (within) SIGHT (perceivable) hence differentiated potential to grow comprehension; which you ignore when suggesting "equal truth".
Equality represents suggested likeness under the umbrella of sameness; which when consented to, causes the conflict of reason (true vs false) which destroys differences. E pluribus unum (out of many one) represents the suggested inversion of the comprehensible (out of oneness many).
One perceives differences; the few suggest sameness by tempting the many to consent to react alike (chain of command; uniformity; following the party-line; agreeing with the mainstream; democratically submitting to be governed by others; consenting to suggestion contract law (religion) etc.)
Sensing changing differences represents communicated inspiration for adaptation. That ain't a problem: but how the solution inspires reaction.
A great sleight of hand for that goes "I am whatever you say I am; if I wasn't then why would I say I am?" Others will keep suggesting accusations about what you are; yet if consent by agreeing or disagreeing with their suggestion; does their accusation gain power. You were perceivable to them before they could make the suggestion about what you are...so you already were.
The song itself is called "The way I am" aka the way (flow) I am (form). That simple.
As a difference; "alike; akin" represents the sales-pitch for ignoring being different for sameness. Try to come up with "two" things that are the same and the "two" contradicts sameness whatever alike; akin things you come up with. If you can perceive one and another one; then that implies that you represent another perceivable different one.
What they are selling represents suggested nothing (the ignorance of everything perceivable) aka Seinfeld's Nothing Pitch.
"and"...if one can count it; then one perceives it as different from another one (I get the love for bamboo canisters though).
Aka being open to consent to suggestions.
Aka always a temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested.
To mix ignores that sound differentiates from source; hence the struggle required to maintain harmony (resonance). Suggested words represent the dissonance within perceivable sound; since the words tempt to reason over affixed meaning; instead of finding level resonance) with the flowing sound by resisting to be flushed by it.
Aka resisting to grow their suggestions by growing your own comprehension of perceivable instead, hence shaping whatever others suggest to your perspective in accordance to the natural order.
The foundation represents the perceivable natural order (flow to form); which the few utilize by suggesting the many the inversion thereof. So now you have natural law cloaked in admiralty law; while the many get legalese for their ignorance.
It tempts to ignore the ongoing temptation (velocity) and ones responsibility (resistance) within it.
Want represents spending resistance to get; need represents recharging resistance by adapting to everything already supplied. Furthermore; the "in the way" idiom represents suggested progressivism (seeking to go with the way); while ignoring to be the temporary resistance within the ongoing way.
When a dragon walks into S-Mart and asks the clerk for home invasion repellent and Bruce Campbell turns around: "This is my boomstick"...“It's a twelve-gauge double-barreled Remington, S-Mart's top-of-the-line. You can find this in the sporting goods department. That's right, this sweet baby was made in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Retails for about $109.95. It's got a walnut stock, cobalt blue steel, and a hair-trigger.”
“That's right. Shop Smart. Shop S-Mart.”
Writing under the influence...I can't recall ever trying that.
Within ALL each ONE represents the center where loss and growth are processed within momentum; like self sustaining filtration from base to ingredient and back to base. Then again...representing the remains of filtration doesn't sound that flattering.
a) when you comprehend something; then it was there before; freely perceivable; ready for you to adapt to. Think back over your progression through martial arts...the potential just had to be grown; it wasn't kept secret from you.
b) SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus; seg; to separate] aka differentiation through motion; which represents the foundation that establishes growth within loss. The parasites suggest it as concealed from sight; when the differentiation represents gaining and then further growing sight.
ONE knows (perceives) ALL (perceivable) from ones perspective at the center; while "out there" represents suggestions form others tempting to ignore balancing within center.
MAG'IC, noun - " the application of natural causes to passive subjects". Once again a status quo of subjected reaction (form) within natural action (flow). To react as the subject to the natural cause implies applying nature; hence expressing it through self.