Yawn. This is the biggest codswallop I have stumbled across. It literally amounts too let's look at clouds and imagine things.
What happened to their roots. I mean okay you have these rocks, former stumps you're calling trees, where are those roots? Last time we all checked if you leave a stump, the roots are still there. Roots would be the same kind of rocks you're calling the stumps. You can see this today. Simply get a scan. It would see the roots or at least part of them, as far as the penetration radar allows. They would have also been formerly surveyed, possibly presently since radar penetration. The root systems wouldn't just go down they'd be veins, running for miles across and into the soil. Where are they? Umm just imagine bullshit, inserting conjecture. As bad as your average Dinosaur, these have become so utterly bullshit, they grow them today. But you're worse, you have imagined this shit.
Rocks don't exist, trees and dinosaurs do. It was a monster world once upon a time ago before the mankind invented any clouds.
What did they cut those trees down with? So there's those rocks, and those trees would be miles high. Calculate it. Along comes the Aliens. Where did they go? What, the next Planet with taller trees. Until they invented, plantations. I mean. Come on. They grow. Why not let them grow again. If you really needed them. Because the trees went extinct? No they shrunk. The asteroid done it, killed them all off. It just took the aliens chopping them down first?
Stop making up bullshit. Prove your theories. They're a joke. It takes a special kind of mental illness. Schizophrenia, from drug infused hallucinations. Test your theory before bothering people with conjecture.
No I am not. Where are the Roots. Real simple, before you make up shit.
Instead of offering another hallucination. You're worse than dinosaurs, at least they really try with dinosaurs. You're calling rocks trees. At least they turn rocks into dinosaurs. You're simply calling the rocks trees.
Large rocks and some large mountains are petrified tree remains?
A mount represents elevated growth; while petrifaction represents reacting form (petrified stone) processed by enacting flow (-ation). Instead of using "tree" as the foundation to compare rocks and mountains to; question the origins (seed out of soil) and behaviors (form within flow).
The terms "tree; rock; mountain and large" represent suggested information by others; which tempts one to a) consent to them as defining ones perceived reality and b) to ignore perceived reality for suggested fiction.
Ask yourself how the parasitic few could hinder the growth of the ignorant many by the suggestion of words?
if you're using the bible as a guide, you'll look for ways to find what it says is true
a) bible (Greek; a book) represents suggested words; which tempts to ignore perceived sound aka the origin of all suggestible (word) represents the perceivable (sound).
b) a guide represents your want for suggested outcome; which ignores the need for life to resist being directed from inception towards death. DIREC (directed by) -ATION (action); which makes those being directed the reaction to action aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
c) if implies then (aka implication within the momentum of motion); yet true implies versus false aka reason (imbalance) in ignorance of momentum (balance). Nature doesn't communicate true or false information towards perceiving senses; it moves everything; which communicates perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
The parasitic few use suggestion to tempt reason (want versus not want division) among the many who ignore to be choice at the center of balance (need/want). These want vs not want conflicts of reason can be rebranded at will by those who make the suggestions to reason about like...true vs false; believing vs not believing; good vs evil; poor vs rich; republican vs democrat; rightwing vs leftwing; capitalism vs communism; coke vs pepsi; soccer vs football; nationalism vs internationalism etc.
giants in this case
Question origin of growth instead of suggested bigger vs smaller.
stuff forms into common shapes
It's form which represents different shapes out of same flow. Everything perceivable represents a differentiation out of the same comprehensible source; yet the parasitic few suggest sameness under the umbrella of unity to deceive the many to ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness"; which implies being ONE (different life) out of ALL (same flow from inception towards death) aka temporary growth (form) within ongoing loss (flow) aka potential within potentiality aka magnetic resistance within electric velocity aka ingredient within base etc.
all throughout nature
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced] aka born form; produced by flow aka impressing flow to compressed momentum to expressed form.
Yawn. This is the biggest codswallop I have stumbled across. It literally amounts too let's look at clouds and imagine things.
What happened to their roots. I mean okay you have these rocks, former stumps you're calling trees, where are those roots? Last time we all checked if you leave a stump, the roots are still there. Roots would be the same kind of rocks you're calling the stumps. You can see this today. Simply get a scan. It would see the roots or at least part of them, as far as the penetration radar allows. They would have also been formerly surveyed, possibly presently since radar penetration. The root systems wouldn't just go down they'd be veins, running for miles across and into the soil. Where are they? Umm just imagine bullshit, inserting conjecture. As bad as your average Dinosaur, these have become so utterly bullshit, they grow them today. But you're worse, you have imagined this shit.
Rocks don't exist, trees and dinosaurs do. It was a monster world once upon a time ago before the mankind invented any clouds.
What did they cut those trees down with? So there's those rocks, and those trees would be miles high. Calculate it. Along comes the Aliens. Where did they go? What, the next Planet with taller trees. Until they invented, plantations. I mean. Come on. They grow. Why not let them grow again. If you really needed them. Because the trees went extinct? No they shrunk. The asteroid done it, killed them all off. It just took the aliens chopping them down first?
Stop making up bullshit. Prove your theories. They're a joke. It takes a special kind of mental illness. Schizophrenia, from drug infused hallucinations. Test your theory before bothering people with conjecture.
No I am not. Where are the Roots. Real simple, before you make up shit.
Instead of offering another hallucination. You're worse than dinosaurs, at least they really try with dinosaurs. You're calling rocks trees. At least they turn rocks into dinosaurs. You're simply calling the rocks trees.
No they didn't asshole. If that's an assumed Stump, then the roots would also become petrified.
Think about the heat needed to cause that. There wouldn't be any soil. It would turn into rock. There would only be rocks.
If the roots rot the stump rots. Dumbass.
Wait, it's zee Aliens. They petrified the stump, when they cut it. Leaving just a Rock for you to puzzle over.
Stop taking drugs.
Petrified wood is a thing... But this isn't some avatar movie with giant trees.
A mount represents elevated growth; while petrifaction represents reacting form (petrified stone) processed by enacting flow (-ation). Instead of using "tree" as the foundation to compare rocks and mountains to; question the origins (seed out of soil) and behaviors (form within flow).
The terms "tree; rock; mountain and large" represent suggested information by others; which tempts one to a) consent to them as defining ones perceived reality and b) to ignore perceived reality for suggested fiction.
Ask yourself how the parasitic few could hinder the growth of the ignorant many by the suggestion of words?
a) bible (Greek; a book) represents suggested words; which tempts to ignore perceived sound aka the origin of all suggestible (word) represents the perceivable (sound).
b) a guide represents your want for suggested outcome; which ignores the need for life to resist being directed from inception towards death. DIREC (directed by) -ATION (action); which makes those being directed the reaction to action aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
c) if implies then (aka implication within the momentum of motion); yet true implies versus false aka reason (imbalance) in ignorance of momentum (balance). Nature doesn't communicate true or false information towards perceiving senses; it moves everything; which communicates perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
The parasitic few use suggestion to tempt reason (want versus not want division) among the many who ignore to be choice at the center of balance (need/want). These want vs not want conflicts of reason can be rebranded at will by those who make the suggestions to reason about like...true vs false; believing vs not believing; good vs evil; poor vs rich; republican vs democrat; rightwing vs leftwing; capitalism vs communism; coke vs pepsi; soccer vs football; nationalism vs internationalism etc.
Question origin of growth instead of suggested bigger vs smaller.
It's form which represents different shapes out of same flow. Everything perceivable represents a differentiation out of the same comprehensible source; yet the parasitic few suggest sameness under the umbrella of unity to deceive the many to ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness"; which implies being ONE (different life) out of ALL (same flow from inception towards death) aka temporary growth (form) within ongoing loss (flow) aka potential within potentiality aka magnetic resistance within electric velocity aka ingredient within base etc.
NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced] aka born form; produced by flow aka impressing flow to compressed momentum to expressed form.