MIT's "Extended Intelligence" may be "difficult to accept" if the source of intelligence is a "collective" where "human intelligence may not always be at the center" [Jones Was Right Flair] - Conspiracies

MIT's "Extended Intelligence" may be "difficult to accept" if the source of intelligence is a "collective" where "human intelligence may not always be at the center" [Jones Was Right Flair] (media.scored.co)

posted 2 years ago by instant_covfefe 2 years ago by instant_covfefe +17 / -0

20 comments

20 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (20)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– inquisitivedave 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

better than yours obviously.

"It has not reason to look after your best interests." That is not claiming to know what the AI would think,

you are claiming to know what the ai would think though. how could you know that it "has no reason to look after your best interest", if you can't even comprehend it's potential motivations.

you're a moron.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– YuuugeAsshoe 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I was talking about uncertainty and possibilities retard

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– inquisitivedave 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

you dont know what you're talking about at all.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– YuuugeAsshoe 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I didnt make any definitive statements. But you would be a fool to be unconcerned about sentient AI.