If you don't have a twitter account, just replace "twitter.com" in the URL with "nitter.net" and you can view the tweet and replies without needing one.
That's 500 000 people. Insane expense. I'm slightly skeptical. Waiting for confirmation, although I wouldn't be too surprised.
Now, if they only tested people who have already been found to have HIV or sickle cell, and not the whole personnel, then the news would be more believable.
Nothing quite promotes loyalty in a soldier like betrayal.
========================
If you don't have a twitter account, just replace "twitter.com" in the URL with "nitter.net" and you can view the tweet and replies without needing one.
Ex: https://nitter.net/Storm4Congress/status/1522576255723483138
That's 500 000 people. Insane expense. I'm slightly skeptical. Waiting for confirmation, although I wouldn't be too surprised.
Now, if they only tested people who have already been found to have HIV or sickle cell, and not the whole personnel, then the news would be more believable.
Is this just like the old HIV from the 80s?
And sickle cell too because...?