20 Proofs NASA Faked the Moon Landings
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Jesus, that was relentless.
I was about to check out when he started with the moon isn’t a physical object. Glad i stayed, fantastic slaying of the claim of a moon landing.
I will say flat earthers have had some irrefutable arguments against the moon landing. Oddly enough I have personal experience that says they are right about another phenomenon. As a Mariner you can do a calculation to see what distance a light or structure (like a lighthouse) should become visible based on the height of the observer, the height of the object and the curvature of the earth. The curve of the earth with theoretically block your view of the object, until you are close enough. Assuming I have high visibility like no fog, smog, or rain, I have never had the horizon block my view of an object. This weirded me out when it happened time and time again, and I did the math myself plus checked with an online calculator. The official explanation is 'light refraction' bends the light over the horizon and allows you to see a mirage of the object; but I don't understand how refraction could work so consistently. Spooky stuff.
Please join us on the community I created to discuss, explore, and share such things!
Click my username and find the link, or let me know and I will pm it to you!
That's some soft flat earth porn you're beating to.
Because there are still useful idiots fighting for jews, against the white race.
The moon isn't a physical object, it's a semi transparent luminary.
I suspect this is correct. It may even be a reflection/"hologram" drawn in ionized plasma in the rarefied air (the reason for its monochromatic palette)
I think I've already invited you - but just the same - please join us on the community I created to discuss, explore, and share our views on this subject!
Click my username to find the link, or let me know and I will PM it to you!
Ok, I can take this is a logical argument, and can build on how the ratio of the moon's size to the distance of the sun.
Just calling it a transparent luminary which is a phrase from ancient astrology isn't very convincing though.
The moon is not a rock that perpetually floats above our heads and never falls, nor made of cheese. That's unscientific and stupid!
Thanks for sharing this, and please join us on the community I created to discuss, explore, and share our views on topics like this!
Paging @hingusthebungus.
This is the dumbest shit. This person has no understanding of basic physics what so ever.
Go back to reddit with that faggy soy shit
Make me
You don't disagree that you are faggy soy shit
lmao dumb boomer glownigger
That makes a lot of sense.