Any -ism is whatever those suggesting it define; redefine or contradict it as...for all those who consent to the suggestion.
Every suggested information tempts ones responding choice of want or not want; while ignoring need. Pro vs anti represents a simple rebrand of want vs not want. Why the rebrand? To distract from the choice underneath fueling the resulting conflicts.
Life doesn't need to be for (want) or against (not want) anything; it's tempted to ignore the need to respond to origin aka adaptation to being moved from inception towards death. One adapts by choice...not to the suggested choices of others (want or not want); but to perceived balance (need/want). Choice represents the center of balance; while the suggested choices of others are tempting choice to imbalance itself.
Any -ism is whatever those suggesting it define; redefine or contradict it as...for all those who consent to the suggestion.
Every suggested information tempts ones responding choice of want or not want; while ignoring need. Pro vs anti represents a simple rebrand of want vs not want. Why the rebrand? To distract from the choice underneath fueling the resulting conflicts.
Life doesn't need to be for (want) or against (not want) anything; it's tempted to ignore the need to respond to origin aka adaptation to being moved from inception towards death. One adapts by choice...not to the suggested choices of others (want or not want); but to perceived balance (need/want). Choice represents the center of balance; while the suggested choices of others are tempting choice to imbalance itself.