See it this way...white vs black cannot be won; since choice represents the center of black/white balance. If you're too racial fixated on the black & white labels...use dark vs light. Are they really in conflict with each other or are you ignoring to be the center choice? Your ignorance of need/want (balance) represents the want vs not want conflicts (imbalance).
Reasoning implies outcome orientation (winning); life represents resisting being moved towards outcome (death).
replacement
RE (response) PLACE (separate room) MENT (mind; memory). The room represents the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death) for the separated choice (life) within.
Replacement MIGRA'TION, noun [Latin migratio.] - "change of place; removing" aka RE (response) MOVING (motion) aka form within flow.
We literally turned them into fucking farm equipment.
Everyone who reasons about the suggestions of others is being farmed for their ignorance aka want (suggestion) over need (perception). It's suggestion that allows the few to "equip" the "minds" (ment) of the consenting many with information; that only the few can define; redefine and contradict at will.
Blacks are completely unable to do anything on their own.
a) "completely unable" represents a deliberate contradiction in terms suggested to you. Complete would imply fully able (flow); while the natural opposite thereof implies less able (form); yet being form (less) within flow (whole) implies an ongoing process; hence contradicting completeness.
b) why are you defining yourself by what others are doing or not doing?
They are only where they are right now because jews have PUT THEM
Did the so called jews put Whites in front of pornography to mass sacrifice their own seed for wanted lust...or did they simply suggest them temptations until consent to self destruction was given?
Slavery represents mental first aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which is exactly why the parasitic few suggest a his-story of physical slavery for the ignorant many to consent to.
Now we have many of the so called blacks consenting to suggested slaverism (hilarious word) under the so called whites; which tempts the whites to consent to feel superior over the blacks; while both are tempted to reason about the status of the chosen ones; who run both black and white institutions. It's like Hans; Jamal and Ira in "the trinity of accusation".
It would take NOTHING to completely exterminate them
a) nothing cannot be perceived; it was suggested to you, and you ignore perceived everything for it.
b) completely (within everything) exterminate (into nothingness?)
c) how is that after all these alleged genocides wielded against us...we both still exist and utilize the ever tempting internet of fictitious information? What if we call "targeted for death" and "not dead yet" as...being alive? While you were reasoning about "extermination"; I spend some quality time with the kids cleaning up a mule that slept in cow-shit.
They pose no threat to us whatsoever.
Aka "lets go hunt none threatening targets into extinction" Why not claim persecution while we're at it?
Anyway; why not use them as inspiration to reshape yourself? They kill each other; you get inspired to sustain life. They steal; you get inspired to resist greed. They rape; you get inspired to protect the mother of your children. They suggest; you allow yourself to get inspired by perceived.
PEOPLE LIKE YOU, who insist we cant do anything about it
"free-will-of-choice" implies the choice to do anything within everything. What I'm talking about isn't about restricting choice; but about the response-ability choice represents. I point out the implications (if/then) of ignoring perceived origin (need/want balance) for suggested outcomes (want vs not want imbalance).
Those who ignore response-ability of choice usually respond in the name of others (we). You blame me (my choice) for why "we" won't attack "them"...I'm inspired by the ignorance of "you". Whatever you suggest as judgement towards me; as blame towards others; or in the name of us all...represents temptation for me to ignore perceived (need) for suggested (want). The more I resist; the more I grow resistance. This is about frequency of resistance.
we need to "be friends"
To be (ONE) implies out of (ALL), so not suggested togetherness; but perceived oneness. Friendship has the ship allegory in it aka the ONE vessel (form) within ALL (flow).
FRIEND, noun - "one who is attached to another by affection". It's the choices of ONEself that affects all other ONEs. The many are tricked to believe friendship represents choice to choice agreement (which implies the agreement vs disagreement conflict). It's choice (reaction) to balance (action) that expresses resonance; which others can join into by also choosing resonance (need) over dissonance (want).
we are going to keep being overrun with them
That's a response to ignoring growth. It's easy to overrun an empty habitat; try the same within a habitat that expresses growth and you'll find resistance...not against others, but for the sustenance of self.
moron
MORON; noun - "one of the highest class of feeble-minded persons". Just a couple of days ago I was called "talpoit" aka "an elite Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) training program for recruits who have demonstrated outstanding academic ability in the sciences and leadership potential; for graduates who pursue double higher education; based on the idea to harness human creativity"
And today...a fucking moron. What if others cannot define who I am; yet tempt me to ignore what I perceive for what they suggest?
From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am; because if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?"
From my perspective: "the way I am" aka the way (flow) I (form) am.
In short...a feeble minded person is still "per sonos" (by sound) perceived...not by words suggested.
See it this way...white vs black cannot be won; since choice represents the center of black/white balance. If you're too racial fixated on the black & white labels...use dark vs light. Are they really in conflict with each other or are you ignoring to be the center choice? Your ignorance of need/want (balance) represents the want vs not want conflicts (imbalance).
Reasoning implies outcome orientation (winning); life represents resisting being moved towards outcome (death).
RE (response) PLACE (separate room) MENT (mind; memory). The room represents the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death) for the separated choice (life) within.
Replacement MIGRA'TION, noun [Latin migratio.] - "change of place; removing" aka RE (response) MOVING (motion) aka form within flow.
Everyone who reasons about the suggestions of others is being farmed for their ignorance aka want (suggestion) over need (perception). It's suggestion that allows the few to "equip" the "minds" (ment) of the consenting many with information; that only the few can define; redefine and contradict at will.
a) "completely unable" represents a deliberate contradiction in terms suggested to you. Complete would imply fully able (flow); while the natural opposite thereof implies less able (form); yet being form (less) within flow (whole) implies an ongoing process; hence contradicting completeness.
b) why are you defining yourself by what others are doing or not doing?
Did the so called jews put Whites in front of pornography to mass sacrifice their own seed for wanted lust...or did they simply suggest them temptations until consent to self destruction was given?
Slavery represents mental first aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which is exactly why the parasitic few suggest a his-story of physical slavery for the ignorant many to consent to.
Now we have many of the so called blacks consenting to suggested slaverism (hilarious word) under the so called whites; which tempts the whites to consent to feel superior over the blacks; while both are tempted to reason about the status of the chosen ones; who run both black and white institutions. It's like Hans; Jamal and Ira in "the trinity of accusation".
a) nothing cannot be perceived; it was suggested to you, and you ignore perceived everything for it.
b) completely (within everything) exterminate (into nothingness?)
c) how is that after all these alleged genocides wielded against us...we both still exist and utilize the ever tempting internet of fictitious information? What if we call "targeted for death" and "not dead yet" as...being alive? While you were reasoning about "extermination"; I spend some quality time with the kids cleaning up a mule that slept in cow-shit.
Aka "lets go hunt none threatening targets into extinction" Why not claim persecution while we're at it?
Anyway; why not use them as inspiration to reshape yourself? They kill each other; you get inspired to sustain life. They steal; you get inspired to resist greed. They rape; you get inspired to protect the mother of your children. They suggest; you allow yourself to get inspired by perceived.
"free-will-of-choice" implies the choice to do anything within everything. What I'm talking about isn't about restricting choice; but about the response-ability choice represents. I point out the implications (if/then) of ignoring perceived origin (need/want balance) for suggested outcomes (want vs not want imbalance).
Those who ignore response-ability of choice usually respond in the name of others (we). You blame me (my choice) for why "we" won't attack "them"...I'm inspired by the ignorance of "you". Whatever you suggest as judgement towards me; as blame towards others; or in the name of us all...represents temptation for me to ignore perceived (need) for suggested (want). The more I resist; the more I grow resistance. This is about frequency of resistance.
To be (ONE) implies out of (ALL), so not suggested togetherness; but perceived oneness. Friendship has the ship allegory in it aka the ONE vessel (form) within ALL (flow).
FRIEND, noun - "one who is attached to another by affection". It's the choices of ONEself that affects all other ONEs. The many are tricked to believe friendship represents choice to choice agreement (which implies the agreement vs disagreement conflict). It's choice (reaction) to balance (action) that expresses resonance; which others can join into by also choosing resonance (need) over dissonance (want).
That's a response to ignoring growth. It's easy to overrun an empty habitat; try the same within a habitat that expresses growth and you'll find resistance...not against others, but for the sustenance of self.
MORON; noun - "one of the highest class of feeble-minded persons". Just a couple of days ago I was called "talpoit" aka "an elite Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) training program for recruits who have demonstrated outstanding academic ability in the sciences and leadership potential; for graduates who pursue double higher education; based on the idea to harness human creativity"
And today...a fucking moron. What if others cannot define who I am; yet tempt me to ignore what I perceive for what they suggest?
From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am; because if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?"
From my perspective: "the way I am" aka the way (flow) I (form) am.
In short...a feeble minded person is still "per sonos" (by sound) perceived...not by words suggested.